Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Withdrawn
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT04951934 |
Other study ID # |
EmoLED_Burn_001 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Withdrawn |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
January 2023 |
Est. completion date |
July 2024 |
Study information
Verified date |
July 2022 |
Source |
Emoled |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
This clinical trial will be a multi-centric prospective, randomized controlled study with the
commercial objective of evaluating the clinical efficacy of a battery-powered portable device
that uses blue LEDs. The clinical study aims to compare the existing standard treatment for
burned areas in which the autologous skin graft was not successful, with a protocol that
includes the administration of the treatment with EmoLED for 5 consecutive weeks in addition
to conventional therapy.
The enrolled patients will have to be examined after 5 weeks of treatment, until complete
healing and subsequently their scarring will have to be evaluated at 3 and 6 months after
healing.
Description:
Burns are the fourth most common type of trauma in the world, after traffic accidents, falls
and personal violence. Around 11 million people worldwide used medical treatment for burns in
2004. The risk of burns increases with the lowering of the socioeconomic status. Of these
burn victims, about 2% need hospitalization and about 0.5% need to be hospitalized in
specialized centers.
In deep burns, the surgical procedure of autologous skin transplant (autograft) is almost
always the preferred way to induce a re-epithelization of the injured area. The coverage of a
deep burn with the graft is -depending on the case case- immediate, delayed a few days after
excision or late, after a first phase of direct scarring. Numerous are the types of surgery
as well as the sites of skin removal.
The autologous graft, however, presents a not negligible probability of failure that leads to
the total or partial detachment of the grafted skin; when this happens the healing process of
the lesion (or a part of it) uncovered occurs by second intention but is not always easy to
manage, as this process can be delayed or stopped by many factors. Known factors contributing
to this are, for example, diabetes, infections, metabolic deficiencies and the advanced age
of the subject, while others are still being studied.
Therefore, proper wound management and dressing after surgery, trauma or disease is an
important part of the healing process, not only to prevent the onset of infections or other
complications, but also to accelerate wound healing itself with as little scarring as
possible.
This clinical study will be a multi-centric prospective, randomized controlled parallel
group, superiority study, with the commercial objective of evaluating the clinical efficacy
of a battery-powered portable device that uses blue LEDs. The Study aims, within the planned
observation weeks, to clinically compare two groups of patients with deep burn injuries whose
autologous skin graft has failed in part or totally. The objective is to determine any
differences in outcome between the two groups considered and whether the therapy of the
treatment group is a valid alternative to the current therapy in terms of reactivation and
support of the reparative process, speed of healing and scarring.
Group 1, the "Control" group, will follow the standard treatment provided by the hospital
protocol; Group 2, the "Treated" one, will follow the standard treatment provided by the
hospital protocol to which is added the treatment with the EmoLED device, scheduled between
the cleansing and the dressing.
The measurement of the difference in efficacy of the device between the two arms will be
evaluated in terms of reactivation of the healing process, intended as the achievement of a
re-epithelialization of at least 30%, speed (time) of healing and scarring (Vancouver scale).
The clinical trial in question aims, therefore, to investigate whether the group of patients
undergoing standard therapy with, in addition, the treatment with EmoLED reaches a higher
percentage of reactivations of the healing process than the one of the control group,
subjected to standard treatment. If confirmed, this result would imply significant gains in
terms of speeding up hospital stay for those patients where autologous grafts have not been
successful, therefore also in terms of reducing public health expenditure, not to mention
that, if the improvement of scarring results were confirmed in the Treated group, it would
increase the quality of life of patients with burn scars which often significantly impact on
this parameter.
The population subject of this trial is widely representative of the target population, as
there are no particular exclusion criteria and the sites involved are structures of
excellence in the treatment of burns and failed skin grafting areas.