Comparing Two Different Surgical Techniques for Breast Reconstruction

Status Withdrawn

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare two standard techniques for breast reconstruction-the prepectoral technique and the subpectoral technique. Again, the prepectoral technique involves putting a tissue expander on top of the pectoralis muscle, while the subpectoral technique involves putting a tissue expander under the pectoralis muscle. The standard approach used at MSK is the subpectoral technique. This study will help researchers find out whether the subpectoral approach is better, the same as, or worse than the prepectoral approach. To decide which approach is better, the researchers will look at which technique causes fewer complications after surgery (for example, infection or the need for a second surgery). Researchers are also interested in seeing which approach causes less pain and use of pain medication after surgery.

Clinical Trial Description

n/a

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Breast Reconstruction

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT04716959
Study type	Interventional
Source	Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Contact
Status	Withdrawn
Phase	Phase 3
Start date	January 14, 2021
Completion date	December 13, 2021

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Recruiting	`NCT03757793` - Near-infrared Spectroscopy for Monitoring Tissue Oxygenation in Breast Reconstruction
Completed	`NCT05491473` - Negative Pressure in PAP Donor Sites
Not yet recruiting	`NCT06013514` - Post-market Prospective Clinical Study of Nagor Perle Mammary Implants
Completed	`NCT02169011` - Secondary Breast Reconstruction With a Flap of Skin From the Back	N/A
Completed	`NCT01216319` - Evaluation of the Cook Biodesign Plastic Surgery Matrix	N/A
Completed	`NCT01176786` - Reusable Versus Disposable Draping System in Breast Reconstruction Surgery	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT00973544` - Do Closed Suction Drains Affect the Complications Rate of Breast Reconstruction With Silicone Prosthesis?	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT00748722` - Pre-Operative Imaging of Abdominal Wall Perforators Using CT Angiography	N/A
Completed	`NCT00753922` - Core Gel Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of Mentor Round Low Bleed Silicone Gel-filled Mammary Prostheses	Phase 3
Completed	`NCT05897463` - Nipple Neurotization
Recruiting	`NCT05377723` - Abdominal Scar Improvement in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction	N/A
Completed	`NCT04350411` - Comparison of PEAK PlasmaBlade™ to Conventional Diathermy in Abdominal Based Free Flap Breast Reconstruction	N/A
Completed	`NCT06321549` - New Era of DIEP With Minimally Invasive Mastectomy
Withdrawn	`NCT03135392` - Sensation After Nipple Sparing Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction With or Without Neurotized Free Tissue Transfer	N/A
Completed	`NCT01256502` - The SERI® Surgical Scaffold Use in Reconstruction Post Market Study for Tissue Support and Repair in Breast Reconstruction Surgery	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT04715802` - Options on the Breast Reconstruction Timing and Method After Removal of Polyacrylamide Hydrogel
Active, not recruiting	`NCT04491591` - Implementing BREASTChoice Into Practice	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04661501` - BREAST ADM Trial for Alloplastic Breast Reconstruction	N/A
Suspended	`NCT03625765` - Integrated Imaging System for In Vivo Visualization of Free Flap Perfusion Using Indocyanine Dye	N/A
Withdrawn	`NCT00778947` - Single Centre Study to Compare Harmonic Scalpel to Conventional Diathermy in Free Tissue Transfer Breast Reconstruction	N/A