Brachial Neuritis Clinical Trial
— NA-CONTROLOfficial title:
Neuralgic Amyotrophy: Central Reorganization and Rehabilitation After Peripheral Dysfunction
NCT number | NCT03441347 |
Other study ID # | 104752 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Completed |
Phase | N/A |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | April 4, 2018 |
Est. completion date | February 22, 2021 |
Verified date | March 2021 |
Source | Radboud University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This study evaluates the effect of a specific, multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program compared to usual care, on motor control and functional disability in patients with neuralgic amyotrophy. Half of the participants will start with the 17-week specific rehabilitation program while the other half will first continue their usual care for 17 weeks, after which they will also receive the 17-week specific rehabilitation program.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 47 |
Est. completion date | February 22, 2021 |
Est. primary completion date | February 22, 2021 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - (Suspected) diagnosis of neuralgic amyotrophy - In subacute or chronic phase of neuralgic amyotrophy (>2 months after attack onset) - Right-handed - Neuralgic amyotrophy predominantly present in right upper extremity - Presence of scapular dyskinesia Exclusion Criteria: - Patients in the acute phase of NA (characterized by severe pain and inflammation of the brachial plexus) - (Prior) NA attacks of the lumbosacral plexus or the left upper extremity - Sever comorbidity - Any (bio)mechanical constraints of the shoulder girdle - Any other central nervous system, neurological, or neuromuscular disorder |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Netherlands | Radboud university medical center | Nijmegen |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Radboud University | Princess Beatrix Muscle Foundation |
Netherlands,
Ijspeert J, Janssen RM, Murgia A, Pisters MF, Cup EH, Groothuis JT, van Alfen N. Efficacy of a combined physical and occupational therapy intervention in patients with subacute neuralgic amyotrophy: a pilot study. NeuroRehabilitation. 2013;33(4):657-65. doi: 10.3233/NRE-130993. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Change in Shoulder Rating Questionnaire (SRQ) score from baseline | Change in functional (dis)ability of the shoulder, arm and hand measured with the SRQ | Baseline (0 weeks) and post-intervention (17 weeks) | |
Primary | Change in brain activity related to central motor control from baseline | Change in the magnitudes of mean functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging signal (Blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) activity) related to motor imagery of the affected arm, quantifying changes in central motor control | Baseline (0 weeks) and post-intervention (17 weeks) | |
Secondary | Change in performance on motor imagery tasks assessing motor control | Change in performance on motor imagery tasks. Performance is evaluated by means of reaction times and error rates. | Baseline (0 weeks), post-intervention (17 weeks) | |
Secondary | Change in Disability of Shoulder, Arm and Hand (DASH) score from baseline | Change in functional (dis)ability of the shoulder, arm and hand measured with the DASH | Baseline (0 weeks), post-intervention (17 weeks) | |
Secondary | Change in Checklist individual strength - subscale fatigue (CIS-fatigue) score from baseline | Change in experienced fatigue | Baseline (0 weeks), post-intervention (17 weeks) | |
Secondary | Change in McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) score from baseline | Change in nature, intensity, location, course, and effect on daily life of experienced pain | Baseline (0 weeks), post-intervention (17 weeks) | |
Secondary | Change in self-efficacy for performing energy conservation strategies assessment (SEPECSA) score from baseline | Change in patient's perceived ability to apply energy conservation strategies to their daily life | Baseline (0 weeks), post-intervention (17 weeks) | |
Secondary | Change in Utrecht scale for evaluation of rehabilitation-participation (USER-P) score from baseline | Change in patient's participation | Baseline (0 weeks), post-intervention (17 weeks) | |
Secondary | Change in Pain self efficacy questionnaire (PSEQ) score from baseline | Change in confidence people with ongoing pain have in performing activities while in pain. | Baseline (0 weeks), post-intervention (17 weeks) | |
Secondary | Change in Patient activation measure (PAM) score from baseline | Change in knowledge, skills and confidence in managing one's own health and/or disease | Baseline (0 weeks), post-intervention (17 weeks) | |
Secondary | Change in Short-form 36 (SF-36) score from baseline | Change in experienced health and health related quality of life | Baseline (0 weeks), post-intervention (17 weeks) | |
Secondary | Change in serratus anterior muscle strength from baseline | Change in maximal force exerted with the serratus anterior muscle from baseline, measured when reaching with extended arm and flexed arm | Baseline (0 weeks), post-intervention (17 weeks) | |
Secondary | Change in shoulder endorotation strength from baseline | Change in maximal force exerted while endorotating the shoulder | Baseline (0 weeks), post-intervention (17 weeks) | |
Secondary | Change in shoulder exorotation strength from baseline | Change in maximal force exerted while exorotating the shoulder | Baseline (0 weeks), post-intervention (17 weeks) | |
Secondary | Change in key grip strength from baseline | Change in maximal force exerted while performing a key grip | Baseline (0 weeks), post-intervention (17 weeks) | |
Secondary | Change in pinch grip strength from baseline | Change in maximal force exerted while performing a pinch grip | Baseline (0 weeks), post-intervention (17 weeks) | |
Secondary | Change in hand grip strength from baseline | Change in maximal force exerted while performing a hand grip | Baseline (0 weeks), post-intervention (17 weeks) | |
Secondary | Change in reachable workspace from baseline | Reachable workspace is an objective measure of upper extremity impairment. Reachable workspace is quantified by the relative surface area representing the portion of the unit hemisphere that is covered by the hand movements made during a standardized movement protocol which covers cardinal movements of the shoulder | Baseline (0 weeks), post-intervention (17 weeks) |