View clinical trials related to Bone Resorption.
Filter by:. There is little information on the degree of crestal bone loss around 4 inter-foraminal implant-retained mandibular overdentures (OVDs) and the amount of bone remodelling on the anterior maxilla and posterior mandibule on long-term function, particularly with different distributions.
In this experiment, after non-traumatic tooth extraction, the blank group underwent natural healing, and the control group underwent alveolar ridge preservation using Bio-Oss Collagen and the experimental group using Sticky Bone, to verify the application of Bio-Oss Collagen and Sticky Bone in alveolar ridge preservation
Post extraction alveolar bone resorption is one of the main challenges that face oral implantologists in their daily surgical practice (1). To palliate to post-extraction resorption, advanced bone grafting and regeneration techniques have been described (2). However, these procedures, although well documented and validated, still have relatively high complication rates and patient morbidity, in addition to the elevated cost and duration of treatment (3). Socket preservation is a very useful technique in order to counter post extraction resorption issues, therefore eliminating the need for future complicated and delicate regeneration procedures (4). Many biomaterials were proposed for socket preservation such as allografts and bovine hydroxyapatite (5). Recently autologous platelet concentrates such as Platelet Rich Fibrin PRF were described as a potential socket filler material (6). In the proposed protocol, fresh extraction sockets will be either grafted by a bovine bone substitute, a PRF plug or a mixture of both. Sockets will then be clinically and radiographically monitored over time to assess three-dimensional soft and hard tissue stability. Bone quality will be histologically examined at 6 months implant placement. A no graft group will serve as control. The results of this study may be of major importance since they could give an objective idea of the most efficient socket preservation technique, thus offering simple and secure oral rehabilitation solutions for both patient and practitioner.
The aim of this clinical trial is to compare serum concentration of bone intake proteins [ sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), cross linked C-telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX-I)] and muscle atrophy marker [creatine kinase (CK-MB)] between patients after the fracture of proximal femur and their age corresponding counterpart without the fracture. The main question it aims to answer is: • Is the higher concentration of bone intake proteins and muscle atrophy marker a predictive factor of proximal femur fracture? The part of participants (Group 1) will be hospitalized at the Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation and will undergo a surgical treatment (open reduction of the fracture). The rest (Group 2) will be admitted to the Department of Internal Medicine. Participants of both Groups will have the blood sample test taken, to evaluate and compare the serum concentration of SHBG, CTX-I and CK-MB proteins.
Implants in the maxillary posterior region are associated with compromised bone in both quantity - notably in vertical dimension- and quality. Along with the fact that the posterior teeth are subjected to higher occlusal forces than the anterior teeth (Marianne Morand & Tassos Irinakis, 2007). In order to overcome these shortcomings, various procedures have been advocated including open and closed sinus lift (Nkenke E & Stelzle F, 2009; Schropp et al, 2003). The use of short implants is a valid alternative for these procedures (Wallace SS & Froum SJ, 2003) sparing the need of applying augmentation techniques with the associated increased time, morbidity and complexity of such procedures.
The experimental study investigates which metabolic responses of calcium and parathyroid hormone are observable in blood and urine in a cohort of 41 healthy adults following a sequence of different exposures: low-calcium water first and high-calcium water afterward.
Many dentists, clinicians and researchers have conducted numerous trials, and put several materials and procedures under the test, in an attempt to preserve vertical and/or horizontal extraction sockets dimensions. The clinical consequences of post-extraction remodeling may affect the outcome of the ensuing therapies aimed at restoring the lost dentition, either by limiting the bone availability for ideal implant placement or by compromising the aesthetic result of the prosthetic restorations. In an attempt for ridge/socket preservation of a freshly extracted tooth socket/bed, this study aims to assess and compare between using autogenous tooth graft added with Hyaluronic acid, and the usage of the standardized autogenous tooth graft alone, regarding the potency, preservative feature, and quality of bone healing, density, and deposition. For a better restorative outcome using a delayed implant placement later on in the edentulous area.
Following tooth extraction, volumetric changes in the soft and hard tissues of the extraction site are expected to occur with considerable resorption of the alveolar bone in both the vertical and the horizontal dimensions. These changes may complicate surgical implant placement and may also compromise the outcome of the prosthetic reconstruction. Various treatment approaches have been introduced aiming to preserve the dimensions of the alveolar ridge at the extraction site and facilitate optimal implant placement. This prospective randomized controlled trial aims to determine the efficacy of alveolar ridge preservation utilizing two different socket seal approaches compared to spontaneous healing to stabilize the blood clot within the postextraction socket. Thirty-six subjects will be randomly allocated into one of the three treatment groups. Group-A: Extraction of the tooth and suturing of the extraction socket with resorbable suture PGA 5/0. Group-B: Extraction of the tooth and placement of a Free Gingival Graft stabilized with resorbable suture PGA 5/0. Group-C: Extraction of the tooth and placement of the Polylactic-Glycolic Acid membrane stabilized with resorbable suture PGA 5/0. After the initial examination for screening, subjects will be assessed at baseline-extraction day- and after 1, 2, and 6 weeks, and 3 months. The changes of the alveolar crest will be determined in height and width, in addition to volumetric changes in the soft tissues, and the width of keratinized tissues. The wound healing process will be visually assessed.
The aim of this randomized prospective clinical trial was to evaluate the outcome of bone block harvesting from the retromolar region using the Conventional and Piezosurgery Method. The study was planned on 19 patients (13F,6M) on 31 donor sites. In patients with bilateral bone harvesting, the donor site and the surgical method to be used were determined by the randomization protocol, while in patients with bone harvesting from a single site, the donor site was determined by considering parameters such as proximity to the operation site and distance to the inferior alveolar nerve. Clinical parameters such as operation time, pain, swelling, trismus, nerve damage were evaluated.
Patients undergoing single immediate implant placement (IIP) in the premaxilla will be invited to participate in this randomized controlled trial (RCT). Prior to surgery, a small- field low-dose cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is taken to verify the integrity of the facial bone wall and an adequate amount of apical and palatal bone availability for implant anchorage. In all of the patients, a connective tissue graft (CTG) will be harvested and inserted into the buccal mucosa to increase soft tissue thickness around the immediately installed implant. However, included patients will be randomly allocated to either receive the CTG immediately after implant installation (Immediate soft tissue grafting, ISG = control group) or 3 months after implant installation (Delayed soft tissue grafting, DSG = test group). Forty sealed envelopes are prepared for that purpose, of which 20 are internally labeled as "DSG" and 20 as "ISG". Following IIP, a sealed envelope will be opened to reveal the treatment concept In both groups, a cutting implant is installed in an optimal 3D position. Socket grafting is performed with deproteinized bovine bone mineral to limit buccal bone resorption and to optimize soft tissue stability. In the ISG group, a pouch is made in the buccal mucosa using microsurgical instruments. Thereupon, a free gingival graft is harvested from the palatal mucosa in the premolar area and de-epithelialized to arrive at a CTG of about 1 mm thickness. Height and length are tailored to the dimensions of the site. Then, the CTG is brought into the pouch and fixed with two single sutures onto the buccal mucosa. Finally, a healing abutment is installed, which is replaced by a provisional implant crown 2 days later. In the DSG group, implant placement, socket grafting and installation of a provisional implant crown occur as described above. In contrast, a buccal pouch is performed 3 months after implant installation. Graft harvesting, adaptation and fixation are performed as described above. A small-field low-dose CBCT is taken at the 1-year and 5-year follow-up in order to measure buccal bone resorption as compared to the baseline dimensions in designated software.