Bone Regeneration Clinical Trial
Official title:
Guided Bone Regeneration With L-PRF in the Atrophic Maxilla - A Pilot Clinical Trial
16 patients with severe resorbed maxillae referred to Implantology Institute® will be
submitted to full arch surgery, with simultaneous implant placement and regeneration in the
aesthetic zone, with the GLAM technique.
Informed consents and local ethical committee clearance will be obtained. Pre, post and 12
months' follow-up CBCT scans will be performed and 2 independent, calibrated operators will
analyze the CBCT scans and mean bone values calculated. The distance from the nasopalatine
canal to the center of each implant will be determined (4 different locations per patient,
corresponding to implants 14; 11; 21; 24) and it will be the reference to other CBCTs.
Implant length will be measured, from the neck (site 1) to the top and then a middle point
will be assessed (site 2). Post-Surgical Volume (mm) will be determined from the most palatal
point of cortical bone until the most buccal regenerated bone in each CBCT. Regenerated bone
gain (mm) at post-op and at 1-year CBCTs will be calculated by the difference between pre and
post-op or pre-op and 1 year CBCT measures, respectively. Regenerated Bone stability (%),
defined as the percentage of regenerated bone at 12 months, will be calculated as the
comparison between CBCT immediately after surgery and the CBCT at 12 months. Results will be
presented as mean, with 95% CI.
Patients with maxillary atrophy and loss of lip support are often a challenge in terms of
prosthodontic rehabilitation and surgical approach due to the aesthetic changes and bone
availability for implant placement.
In edentulous patients, with severe maxillary atrophy and an obvious loss of lip support, the
anterior maxilla commonly exhibits a thin buccal bone plate which requires horizontal bone
augmentation, since various authors have mentioned that a minimum 2mm of facial bone is
required to prevent vertical bone resorption.
The scientific literature describes several techniques for these cases (such as collagen or
titanium membranes, non-resorbable pins, use of xenografts, allografts or autogenous bone)
but still, none is considered as the gold standard.
The simultaneous approach, where implant placement is coincident with graft procedures, is
preferred by both patients and clinicians, since it reduces treatment time and cost. However,
it can't be applied in every case, due to the need of proper implant stability.
A significant clinical interest has grown regarding the use of L-PRF for regeneration, solely
or in combination with xenografts, given its ease of protocol preparation, economic
advantages, less invasive technique (no need for donor sites) and biological properties.
Also, L-PRF has been used around immediately placed implants to restore the anatomy loss and
to speed up soft tissue wound healing. However, the use of enough L-PRF membranes seems to be
crucial to obtain an optimal effect.
For this reason, the use of a Guided bone regeneration with L-PRF in the Atrophic Maxilla
(GLAM) technique is suggested as a surgical approach in patients with maxillary atrophy and
evident loss of lip support, where Guided bone regeneration is performed with the use of
L-PRF membranes and xenograft to restore the buccal bone volume of the Atrophic Maxilla,
simultaneously to implant placement.
Aim: The purpose of this clinical trial is to evaluate the dimensional changes in the
aesthetic zone of resorbed maxillae (based on CBCT scans) occurred 12 months after implant
placement and simultaneous regeneration with the GLAM technique.
SURGICAL PROTOCOL: At the beginning of each surgery, a venipuncture will be performed, and
blood will be drawn into red topped tubes (BD Vacutainer ®, 10mL) and centrifuged at 2700 rpm
(IntraSpin™ Centrifuge, Intra-Lock ®) for 12 minutes to obtain the L-PRF membranes. Also, two
white topped tubes (BD Vacutainer ®, 9mL) will be centrifuged for 3 minutes to obtain PRP.
Both L-PRF membranes and PRP will be prepared according to previously described protocols.
After implant placement, achieving a primary stability of at least 45 Ncm, the stiff
bone-block (L-PRF membranes and PRP combined with bovine xenograft) will be used in the
buccal plate of the pre-maxilla, to enhance bone volume in the esthetic area. After handling
and positioning the bone block, a minimum of 3 layers of L-PRF membranes will be placed over
the graft, in order to enhance the soft tissue healing. In cases where primary closure is not
achievable, the top layer of the membranes will be left exposed.
CBCT ANALYSIS: Pre-op, post-op and 12 months' follow-up CBCT scans will be performed. Two
independent, calibrated operators will analyze the CBCT scans and mean values will be
calculated.
The distance from the nasopalatine canal to the center of each anterior implant will be
determined in the post-op CBCT, in the panoramic perspective, and this will be the reference
value to the other CBCTs. Four different locations will be determined per patient, in the
anterior region of the maxilla, delimited by the anterior border of the maxillary sinus.
These locations corresponded to the former lateral incisors and first pre-molars positions.
In sagittal cuts of the CBCT, the implant length will be measured, from the neck (site 1) to
the top. Afterwards, a middle point will be assessed (site 2). These sites are the reference
for measurements of bone volume in all the CBCT scans. Both sites correspond to the most
grafted areas of the implants when restoring the lip support, thus more susceptible to
dimensional changes. The apical third of the implant is responsible for the palatal bone
anchorage.
Considering the CBCT scans, the following variables will be measured in both sites 1 and 2:
Post-Surgical Volume (mm): determined from the most palatal point of cortical bone until the
most buccal point of regenerated bone, perpendicular to the implant's long axis.
Regenerated Bone Gain (mm): measured at the post-op and the 12 months CBCT scans from the
most palatal point of cortical bone until the most buccal point of regenerated bone,
perpendicular to the implant's long axis. Calculated by the difference between pre and
post-op CBCTs (regenerated bone gain at post-op) and by the difference between pre-op and 12
months CBCT measures (regenerated bone gain at 12 months).
Regenerated Bone Stability (%): defined as the percentage of regenerated bone at 12 months,
compared to immediately after surgery.
The results will be presented as mean, with 95% CI. Paired or independent Student's t-Test or
ANOVA were used in this analysis. Post hoc tests will be used as appropriate, and Alpha will
be set at 0.05.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT05443776 -
In Vivo Investigation of 6 Membranes Including Their Physical, Chemical and Biological Properties.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04744012 -
Modified Periostal Pocket Flap Technique
|
||
Completed |
NCT06420713 -
Horizontal Bone Augmentation of Alveolar Ridge
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03497403 -
Socket Preservation Procedure Studying Soft and Hard Tissue Outcomes
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04149080 -
Effects of Simvastatin Gel on Bone Neoformation in Post-extraction Sockets: a Randomized Controlled Trial
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06439264 -
Assessing the Clinical Efficacy of Bentonite Clay Gel on Bone Regeneration in the Treatment of Intra-bony Defects: A Clinico-radiograph Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04205591 -
Comparative Study Between Porcine and Autologous Cortical Plates
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03432702 -
Horizontal Ridge Augmentation With or Without Autogenous Block Grafts
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02387008 -
Prospective, Comparative Assessment of Alveolar Bone Augmentation Using GUIDOR® Membrane in the Bound Edentulous Space
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04937023 -
Ursodeoxycholic Acid (Udca) as a Local Drug Delivery Agent in the Treatment of Intra-bony Defects
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05791123 -
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Following Tooth Extraction Using Bovine Xenograft With Platelet Rich Fibrin Membrane
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06168500 -
Narrow Implants Vs Standard Implants With Simultaneous GBR
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT00435877 -
Procurement of Tissue Samples for Cell Cultures and Analyses
|
||
Completed |
NCT03496688 -
Comparative Results of Six Biomaterials Used in Two-stage Maxillary Sinus
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04338139 -
Influence of Bio-Oss Collagen Grafting at Implant Placement on Buccal Bone Volume Regeneration
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06226116 -
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF BONE IMPLANT CONTACT (BIC) ON NEW BONE REGENERATED WITH AUTOGENOUS DENTIN AND NATIVE BONE
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04131894 -
Effects of Autogenous Dentin Graft on Socket Preservation
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06061354 -
Teriparatide on Maxillary Sinus Floor Osseointegration
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03785717 -
Horizontal Ridge Augmentation in Mandible Usign ROG + ESWT
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02890680 -
Effects of the Use of Platelet-rich Fibrin on Bone Regeneration After Impacted Third Molar Surgery
|
N/A |