Clinical trial NCT00474968 - References

Biopsy — Adequacy and Efficacy of the e2TM Cervical Cell Collector Compared to Standard Spatula/CytoBrush Technique.

Citation(s)

•   Buntinx F, Brouwers M
  Relation between sampling device and detection of abnormality in cervical smears: a meta-analysis of randomised and quasi-randomised studies. BMJ. 1996 Nov 23;313(7068):1285-90.
•   Clavel C, Masure M, Bory JP, Putaud I, Mangeonjean C, Lorenzato M, Nazeyrollas P, Gabriel R, Quereux C, Birembaut P
  Human papillomavirus testing in primary screening for the detection of high-grade cervical lesions: a study of 7932 women. Br J Cancer. 2001 Jun 15;84(12):1616-23.
•   Fahey MT, Irwig L, Macaskill P
  Meta-analysis of Pap test accuracy. Am J Epidemiol. 1995 Apr 1;141(7):680-9.
•   Holowaty P, Miller AB, Rohan T, To T
  RESPONSE: re: natural history of dysplasia of the uterine cervix . J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999 Aug 18;91(16):1420A-1421.
•   Koss LG
  Evolution in cervical pathology and cytology: a historical perspective. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2000;21(6):550-4.
•   Marchand L, Mundt M, Klein G, Agarwal SC
  Optimal collection technique and devices for a quality pap smear. WMJ. 2005 Aug;104(6):51-5.
•   Martin-Hirsch P, Jarvis G, Kitchener H, Lilford R
  Collection devices for obtaining cervical cytology samples. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD001036. Review. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(3):CD001036.
•   Martin-Hirsch P, Lilford R, Jarvis G, Kitchener HC
  Efficacy of cervical-smear collection devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 1999 Nov 20;354(9192):1763-70. Erratum in: Lancet 2000 Jan 29;355(9201):414.
•   Muñoz N, Bosch FX, de Sanjosé S, Herrero R, Castellsagué X, Shah KV, Snijders PJ, Meijer CJ; International Agency for Research on Cancer Multicenter Cervical Cancer Study Group
  Epidemiologic classification of human papillomavirus types associated with cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003 Feb 6;348(6):518-27.
•   Nanda K, McCrory DC, Myers ER, Bastian LA, Hasselblad V, Hickey JD, Matchar DB
  Accuracy of the Papanicolaou test in screening for and follow-up of cervical cytologic abnormalities: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2000 May 16;132(10):810-9. Review.
•   Sankaranarayanan R, Budukh AM, Rajkumar R
  Effective screening programmes for cervical cancer in low- and middle-income developing countries. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(10):954-62. Epub 2001 Nov 1. Review.
•   Selvaggi SM, Guidos BJ
  Specimen adequacy and the ThinPrep Pap Test: the endocervical component. Diagn Cytopathol. 2000 Jul;23(1):23-6.
•   Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, Moriarty A, O'Connor D, Prey M, Raab S, Sherman M, Wilbur D, Wright T Jr, Young N; Forum Group Members; Bethesda 2001 Workshop
  The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA. 2002 Apr 24;287(16):2114-9. Review.
•   Waxman AG
  Guidelines for cervical cancer screening: history and scientific rationale. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Mar;48(1):77-97. Review.
•   Willis BH, Barton P, Pearmain P, Bryan S, Hyde C
  Cervical screening programmes: can automation help? Evidence from systematic reviews, an economic analysis and a simulation modelling exercise applied to the UK. Health Technol Assess. 2005 Mar;9(13):1-207, iii. Review.

Clinical Study Validating the Adequacy, Efficacy, and Safety of the e2TM Cervical Cell Collector Compared to Standard Spatula/CytoBrush Technique In Patients With Recent History of Abnormal Pap Test Returning for Colposcopy/Biopsy.

Details for clinical trial NCT00474968