Biliary Tract Neoplasms Clinical Trial
Official title:
Endoscopic Radiofrequency Ablation for Malignant Biliary Obstruction
Verified date | January 2014 |
Source | Medical University of Vienna |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | Austria: Ethikkommission |
Study type | Interventional |
Biliary obstruction is importantly influencing quality of life and survival of patients suffering from primary or secondary bile duct malignancies. The aim of this retrospective data analysis is to evaluate endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with the HabibTM EndoHBP catheter for the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction. RFA procedures performed in Austria so far will be analyzed with regard to feasibility and safety of the technique. Therefore, the following parameters will be assessed: (among others) technical failures during the RFA procedure, complications during the RFA procedure, hospital stay, adverse events during hospital stay and until first clinical control after discharge (an expected average of 4 weeks after RFA procedure), 30-day and 90-day mortality. The results of this study should help to better understand important aspects of biliary RFA which may positively influence future applications of this method.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 58 |
Est. completion date | May 2013 |
Est. primary completion date | May 2013 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | All patients who underwent endoscopic radiofrequency ablation with the HabibTM EndoHBP as a treatment for malignant biliary obstruction in Austria between November 2010 and December 2012. |
Endpoint Classification: Safety Study, Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Austria | Medical University of Vienna, Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology | Vienna |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Medical University of Vienna |
Austria,
de Groen PC, Gores GJ, LaRusso NF, Gunderson LL, Nagorney DM. Biliary tract cancers. N Engl J Med. 1999 Oct 28;341(18):1368-78. Review. — View Citation
Itoi T, Isayama H, Sofuni A, Itokawa F, Tamura M, Watanabe Y, Moriyasu F, Kahaleh M, Habib N, Nagao T, Yokoyama T, Kasuya K, Kawakami H. Evaluation of effects of a novel endoscopically applied radiofrequency ablation biliary catheter using an ex-vivo pig liver. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2012 Sep;19(5):543-7. doi: 10.1007/s00534-011-0465-7. — View Citation
Kaassis M, Boyer J, Dumas R, Ponchon T, Coumaros D, Delcenserie R, Canard JM, Fritsch J, Rey JF, Burtin P. Plastic or metal stents for malignant stricture of the common bile duct? Results of a randomized prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Feb;57(2):178-82. — View Citation
Minami Y, Kudo M. Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: Current status. World J Radiol. 2010 Nov 28;2(11):417-24. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v2.i11.417. — View Citation
Ortner ME, Caca K, Berr F, Liebetruth J, Mansmann U, Huster D, Voderholzer W, Schachschal G, Mössner J, Lochs H. Successful photodynamic therapy for nonresectable cholangiocarcinoma: a randomized prospective study. Gastroenterology. 2003 Nov;125(5):1355-63. — View Citation
Skipworth JR, Olde Damink SW, Imber C, Bridgewater J, Pereira SP, Malagó M. Review article: surgical, neo-adjuvant and adjuvant management strategies in biliary tract cancer. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Nov;34(9):1063-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04851.x. Epub 2011 Sep 20. Review. — View Citation
Smith AC, Dowsett JF, Russell RC, Hatfield AR, Cotton PB. Randomised trial of endoscopic stenting versus surgical bypass in malignant low bileduct obstruction. Lancet. 1994 Dec 17;344(8938):1655-60. — View Citation
Soderlund C, Linder S. Covered metal versus plastic stents for malignant common bile duct stenosis: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Jun;63(7):986-95. — View Citation
Steel AW, Postgate AJ, Khorsandi S, Nicholls J, Jiao L, Vlavianos P, Habib N, Westaby D. Endoscopically applied radiofrequency ablation appears to be safe in the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jan;73(1):149-53. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.09.031. — View Citation
Zoepf T, Jakobs R, Arnold JC, Apel D, Riemann JF. Palliation of nonresectable bile duct cancer: improved survival after photodynamic therapy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Nov;100(11):2426-30. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | Hospital stay | Duration of hospitalization after the performance of RFA. | Inpatient stay after RFA-procedure (an expected average of 5 days) | No |
Other | Number of patients with Adverse events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability | Adverse events occuring within 30 days after the RFA-procedure, defined as any adverse change from the subject's baseline condition, i.e. any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease which is considered to be clinically relevant by the physician, whether or not considered related to the medical device. | During hospital stay and until first clinical control after discharge (an expected average of 4 weeks after RFA procedure) | Yes |
Other | Mortality | Deaths occuring within 30 and 90 days after the RFA-procedure. | 30 days and 90 days after RFA-procedure (calculating 30- and 90-day mortality rate), assessed retrospectively by screening clinical reports (including death reports) of the study patients on average 1 year after RFA-procedure | Yes |
Primary | Number of RFA-procedures with technical failures | The technical feasibility in this study will be specified as ratio of all technically successful RFA-applications to all examinations in which RFA-use was intended. A RFA-application will be classified as technically successful if it is possible to introduce the RFA-catheter into the biliary system, place it adequately accross the malignant stricture, apply RFA-energy and withdraw the RFA-catheter after RFA-application. | During the respective RFA-examination (an expected average of 1 hour) | No |
Secondary | Number of patients with interventional complications | Clinically relevant complications occuring during the use of RFA, defined as any adverse change from the subject's baseline condition, which is considered to be clinically relevant by the physician, whether or not considered related to the medical device (e.g. bleeding, perforation). | During the respective RFA-procedure (an expected average of 1 hour) | Yes |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT01950572 -
Tissue Procurement and Natural History Study of Patients With Malignant Mesothelioma
|
||
Completed |
NCT03101566 -
Study of Nivolumab in Combination With Gemcitabine/Cisplatin or Ipilimumab for Patients With Advanced Unresectable Biliary Tract Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05237193 -
A Prospective Study of UCAD for Diagnosing Benign or Malignant Biliary Obstruction and Follow-up
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06037655 -
Chemotherapy Combined With Adebrelimab and Mecapegfilgrastim in Neoadjuvant Treatment of Potentially Resectable BTC
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04584008 -
Targeted Agent Evaluation in Digestive Cancers in China Based on Molecular Characteristics
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00196105 -
Malignant Obstruction ZILVER Against Routine Therapy (MOZART I)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02558959 -
Second-line Irinotecan and Capecitabine Versus Irinotecan for Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Refractory Biliary Tract Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02829918 -
Study of Nivolumab in Patients With Advanced Refractory Biliary Tract Cancers
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02784353 -
Clinical Outcomes of Preoperative and Postoperative Rehabilitation in the Patients With HBP Malignancy
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05429203 -
Comparison of Duodenoscope With Single-use Distal Cover and the Conventional Reusable Duodenoscope
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02255669 -
Fully Covered SEMS Versus Partially Covered SEMS With Anti-migration System for Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01731821 -
Nonstented Stump-closed vs Duct-to-Mucosa Pancreaticojejunostomy After Pancreaticoduodenectomy
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00422409 -
Endoscopic Stenting of Gastrointestinal Cancer
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02900248 -
CureOne Registry: Advanced Malignancy or Myelodysplasia, Tested by Standard Sequencing and Treated by Physician Choice
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03063554 -
EUS BD vs ERCP TP for Pancreatic Cancer
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02615210 -
Mid-Atlantic Research Group Single-Operator Cholangioscopic Assessment of Biliary Strictures
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04595058 -
LAMS Choledochoduodenostomies: With or Without Coaxial Plastic Stent
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04856761 -
A Study of Capecitabine Versus S-1 as Adjuvant Therapy in Patients With Biliary Tract Carcinoma After Surgical Resection
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03427242 -
Apatinib for Advanced Biliary Carcinoma
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05615818 -
Personalized Medicine for Advanced Biliary Cancer Patients
|
Phase 3 |