Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Clinical Trial
Official title:
Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Transperineal Laser Ablation in Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy Patients: Non-Pharmacological Interventional Study
NCT number | NCT04044573 |
Other study ID # | R.S.71.18 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Recruiting |
Phase | N/A |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | May 5, 2018 |
Est. completion date | April 5, 2023 |
Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Transperineal Laser Ablation in Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy Patients: Non-Pharmacological Interventional Study
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 40 |
Est. completion date | April 5, 2023 |
Est. primary completion date | April 5, 2023 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Male |
Age group | 51 Years to 85 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Over 50 years old - BPH confirmed by mpMRI - Uroflowmetry indicating obstructive pathology - Surgical risk moderate-elevated - Symptomatology of obstructive pathology (voiding hesitation, intermittent mitt, urinary flow reduction, incomplete emptying of the bladder, post-urination incontinence and irritative symptoms such as urinary frequency, dysuria, nocturia - quantified with IPSS) - Signature of the information sheet and of the informed consent to the treatment, at the execution of the multiparametric MRI and the administration of the paramagnetic contrast medium. Exclusion Criteria: - MRI signs of malignancy confirmed by biopsy investigation - Urethral stenosis - Serious coagulation disorders - Inadequate compliance - Ischemic pathology in the previous six months - Presence of pacemakers - Active phase inflammatory pathology - Presence of III dominant prostate lobe - Contraindications to the execution of MRI (claustrophobia, auricular implants, metal prostheses and other contraindications included in the specific informed consent) - Paramagnetic contrast medium allergy. - Acute and / or chronic renal failure (GFR <50 mL / min and serum creatinine> 1.5 mg / d) - Not adequate understanding of the information sheet |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Italy | Policlinico Tor Vergata (PTV) Foundation: UOC Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology | Rome | RM |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University of Rome Tor Vergata |
Italy,
Bremer C, Kreft G, Roggan A, Filler T, Reimer P. Ex vivo evaluation of novel miniaturized laser-induced interstitial thermotherapy applicators for effective small-volume tissue ablation. Invest Radiol. 2001 Jun;36(6):327-34. — View Citation
Costello AJ, Bowsher WG, Bolton DM, Braslis KG, Burt J. Laser ablation of the prostate in patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy. Br J Urol. 1992 Jun;69(6):603-8. — View Citation
Goldberg SN, Grassi CJ, Cardella JF, Charboneau JW, Dodd GD 3rd, Dupuy DE, Gervais D, Gillams AR, Kane RA, Lee FT Jr, Livraghi T, McGahan J, Phillips DA, Rhim H, Silverman SG; Society of Interventional Radiology Technology Assessment Committee. Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005 Jun;16(6):765-78. — View Citation
Lindner U, Weersink RA, Haider MA, Gertner MR, Davidson SR, Atri M, Wilson BC, Fenster A, Trachtenberg J. Image guided photothermal focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: phase I trial. J Urol. 2009 Oct;182(4):1371-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.06.035. Epub 2009 Aug 14. — View Citation
Patelli G, Ranieri A, Paganelli A, Mauri G, Pacella CM. Transperineal Laser Ablation for Percutaneous Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Feasibility Study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017 Sep;40(9):1440-1446. doi: 10.1007/s00270-017-1662-9. Epub 2017 May 4. — View Citation
Raz O, Haider MA, Davidson SR, Lindner U, Hlasny E, Weersink R, Gertner MR, Kucharczyk W, McCluskey SA, Trachtenberg J. Real-time magnetic resonance imaging-guided focal laser therapy in patients with low-risk prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2010 Jul;58(1):173-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.03.006. Epub 2010 Mar 12. Erratum in: Eur Urol. 2010 Sep;58(3):473. Kucharcyzk, Walter [corrected to Kucharczyk, Walter]. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Clinical symptoms at 1-yr follow-up evaluated with usual objective and subjective parameters | Improvement of obstructive symptomatology correlated to BPH. The evaluation will be based on urodynamic studies of Qmax, post void and residual volume. | 12 months | |
Primary | Rate of complication needing re-hospitalisation or reintervention | Evaluation of complications post TPLA treatment by MRI. | procedure date to 12 months | |
Secondary | Reproducibility of Multi-parametric MRI | Evaluation of multi-parametric MRI of the prostate to quantify and/or preview coagulative necrosis after treatment and evaluate the response to transperineal laser ablation treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms. | 12 months. | |
Secondary | Total and post-operative costs during follow-up compared to transurethral resection of the prostate | Calculation and stratification of prodecural costs in in comparison to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). | 12 months | |
Secondary | Evaluation of Quality of Life by International Prostate Symptom Score | Evaluation of quality of life quantified by the questionnaire (IPSS) | 12 months | |
Secondary | Evaluation of Quality of Life by International Index of Erectile Function | Evaluation of Quality of Life by International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) | 12 months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT04807296 -
Thulium Fiber Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (TFLEP) vs HoLEP With Moses Technology (m-HoLEP)
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05574244 -
Comparison of Functional Outcomes of Ejaculation-preserving Partial Trans Urethral Resection of the Prostate With Complete Trans Urethral Resection of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Obstruction
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04288427 -
5-Alpha Reductase 2 as a Marker of Resistance to 5ARI Therapy
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04245566 -
Prostatic Artery Embolization vs. Pharmacotherapy for LUTS/BPH
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03246880 -
Clinical Trial To Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of CKD-397 in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Patients
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02509975 -
Safety and Efficacy of OCL 503 in Prostate Artery Embolization
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT01967251 -
Efficacy, Safety and Dose-response of Udenafil in Patients With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Erectile Dysfunction
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02283684 -
GreenLight Laser Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate vs Bipolar Transurethral Vaporization of the Prostate; RCT
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02206243 -
Embozene® Microspheres for Prostatic Arterial Embolization in Patients With Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
|
||
Completed |
NCT01438775 -
Phase 3 Evaluation of Re-Injection of NX-1207 for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01454349 -
Study of PRX302 for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01139762 -
A Study of Tadalafil Use With Finasteride in Men With Enlarged Prostates and Urinary Symptoms
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01152190 -
A Study in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
|
Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT00400894 -
Annexin A3 (ANXA3) as Protein-Based Marker for Non-Invasive Molecular Diagnostics of Prostate Carcinoma
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00701779 -
Dutasteride and Flex Dose of Tamsulosin on as Needed Basis, to Treat Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00224133 -
The Evaluation of the Safety of a New Drug for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Used for 9 Months
|
Phase 3 | |
Unknown status |
NCT00381108 -
Study of the Effects of Pomegranate Tablets on Enlarged Prostates
|
Phase 1 | |
Terminated |
NCT02962674 -
To Evaluate the Safety and Performance of the ProstaCare Water Electrolysis System in Relieving Symptoms of BPH.
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05415748 -
Deprescribing Tamsulosin in Older Men
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04853914 -
Evaluation of the Safety of the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia by High Intensity Focused Ultrasound.
|
N/A |