View clinical trials related to Basal Cell Carcinoma.
Filter by:This is a single center randomized selected Phase II study of FLASH radiotherapy (RT) versus standard of care (SOC) radiotherapy in patients with localized Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma (cSCC) or Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC). In summary, the aims of the study are to describe and compare the toxicity and efficacy of high dose rate radiotherapy (FLASH therapy) to SOC conventional radiotherapy (according to the standard guidelines per lesion size) through a randomized Phase II selection study in patients presenting localized cSCC or BCC requiring a radiotherapy treatment.
The overall objective of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of treatment of Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC) using a new modality based on high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU). BCC is the most common type of skin cancer in Europe, Australia and the US. It accounts for more than 75% of all skin cancer cases in those regions. There are currently more the 14000 BCC cases registrations in Poland every year, and occurrences on a global scale are counted in several millions per year. Given the trend of aging population those numbers will only increase with time. Finding new and more effective treatment methods are therefore highly relevant from both a clinical and socioeconomic perspective. The investigational device used in the study is a system capable of making controlled and targeted thermo-mechanical treatment of small intradermal volumes containing e.g. BCC cells, but without inflicting damage to the surrounding tissue. The investigation involves an evaluation of the safety and efficacy profile 3 months after a single few-minute treatment. Subsequent follow-up of secondary endpoints is done every third month until the end of the study one year after the treatment.
The investigators will conduct a single-arm pilot feasibility trial of mentored community gardening for melanoma survivors integrating dosimeters and accelerometers. Harvest for Health Together Arizona (H4H2-AZ) is an evidence-based program adapted for arid desert gardening that also addresses sun safety through group workshops and peer education. The primary aim is to evaluate adherence to the intervention.
In this study, various health care professionals will follow an E-learning module in which BCC detection on OCT is explained. Thereafter, the participants will test their skill by assessing OCT-scans. Their performance will be monitored using cumulative-sum analysis. After completion, newly trained OCT assessors will test their diagnostic accuracy for BCC detection on OCT in a exploratory study. The trainability, amount of required training and diagnostic accuracy will be compared between dermatologist and non-dermatologists.
Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) are the most frequent skin cancers. Their incidence is constantly increasing. BCC diagnosis is first clinically suspected and then confirmed following histological examination of either a skin biopsy or the excisional specimen. Surgery is the first-line treatment and some procedures (notably Mohs surgery) require extemporaneous histological analysis of the edges to ensure a complete excision. Such on-site histopathological examination can be time consuming and associated with decreased sensitivity. Skin imaging techniques have already been tested to overcome these limitations and seem promising. Although some of them - such as confocal microscopy - are already even used in vivo, there is to date no report of the use of full-field optical coherence tomography for the diagnosis of BCC. The DOCTOBA study intends to describe direct histopathological examination of fresh skin biopsy or excisional specimen with dynamic full-field optical coherence tomography.
Superficial basal cell carcinoma (sBCC) can be treated non-invasively, but follow-up is necessary because lesions can reoccur. This study aims to evaluate the additional value of optical coherence tomography (OCT) for the detection of recurrent BCC lesions, that may remain unrecognized by clinical and dermoscopic examination (CDE). This study compared the diagnostic accuracy of CDE and CDE combined with OCT for detection of recurrent basal cell carcinoma (BCC) after non-invasive treatment of sBCC.
Locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (BCC) are large BCCs or BCCs located in areas subject to functional and aesthetic risk following surgery or radiotherapy. In these particular situations, surgery and radiotherapy are sometimes not appropriate, and Sonic Hedgehog inhibitors (SHHi) (Vismodegib and Sonidegib) can be proposed. SHHi are effective treatments in laBCC but most CR patients discontinue treatment because of tolerability. Approximately 65% of the population experience a relapse after discontinuation. A few cases of patients treated concomitantly by radiotherapy and vismodegib have been reported in the literature, suggesting that combining vismodegib and concomitant radiotherapy results in an improved overall response compared to a single modality treatment. There is no study evaluating a "consolidation radiotherapy" after complete response to SHHi. We carry out a prospective multicenter study in order to evaluate consolidation radiotherapy in patients with laBCC after achieving complete response with SHHi, with the hypothesis of reducing recurrence after discontinuation of SHHi.
The purpose of this study is to find out more about how Basal Cell Carcimonas/BCCs grow and to learn more effective ways to monitor and treat these common cancers. This study will not provide any type of treatment for the participants' cancer; it is a 3-year observational study to monitor participants' cancer.
Background: Oral hedgehog inhibitors vismodegib and sonidegib have been used for the treatment of locally advanced (laBCC), metastatic basal cell carcinoma (mBCC) and in basal cell nevus syndrome (BCNS) patients. In the Netherlands, targeted therapy with vismodegib and sonidegib has been available since 2013 and 2021, respectively. No direct comparative studies have been performed between the two oral hedgehog inhibitors (HHI) vismodegib and sonidegib yet . In addition, data for sonidegib are not yet available. Objective: The aim of this study is 1) to evaluate the effectiveness of oral HHIs in the treatment of laBCC, mBCC and BCNS patients and 2) to compare the oral HHIs vismodegib and sonidegib. Study design: prospective registration study that includes all patients, regardless of age and gender, with histologically proven basal cell carcinoma receiving treatment with either vismodegib or sonidegib in the Netherlands. Patient, tumor and treatment information was gathered from patient records. Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary outcome for measuring efficacy/tumor response was median progression free survival (PFS) where the decrease, stagnation or increase in tumor size is measured by maximum diameter. Secondary outcomes are frequency, severity and reversibility of treatment-emergent adverse events and disease-specific quality of life expressed as mean scores on the EORTC-QLQ-C30 and aBCCdex questionnaires.
A Multicenter, Prospective, Low-interventional Clinical Study Evaluating on mobile application validation ("ProRodinki") in assessing the risk of skin malignant neoplasms