Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT04818476 |
Other study ID # |
x |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Recruiting |
Phase |
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
February 10, 2020 |
Est. completion date |
December 31, 2022 |
Study information
Verified date |
March 2021 |
Source |
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) |
Contact |
Man Wai Chan, MD |
Phone |
(0)20 4442432 |
Email |
m.w.chan[@]amsterdamumc.nl |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Observational
|
Clinical Trial Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess lymph node metastasis rate, distant metastasis rate,
disease-specific mortality, and overall mortality in patients with Barrett's related T1b and
high risk T1a esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) who underwent a diagnostic endoscopic
resection.
Description:
The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) has increased six-fold over the last three
decades, making it the most rapidly rising cancer in the Western world. The main histologic
risk factor for development of EAC is the presence of Barrett's esophagus (BE). BE can
develop from non-dysplastic BE, to low (LGD) and high grade dysplasia (HGD) and, eventually,
EAC.
The past two decades minimally invasive endoscopic resection (ER) has replaced surgical
esophagectomy as first-choice therapy for the treatment of early neoplastic lesions in
Barrett's esophagus. ER provides adequate tissue specimens, allowing for accurate
histopathological staging of a lesion, by assessment of invasion depth, differentiation
grade, presence of lympho-vascular invasion (LVI), and radicality of the resection.
Endoscopic resection thus similarly fulfils a diagnostic and therapeutic role in the
management of Barrett's neoplasia.
However, ER offers local treatment and does not include lymph node dissection as is still
standard of care during esophagectomy. Therefore, the choice to perform endoscopic follow-up
after a radical ER of an early EAC, or to refer a patient for additional surgery, is guided
by the assumed risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM).
Data from previous studies show that the risk of LNM is only 1% in patients with low risk
mucosal EAC after endoscopic treatment (i.e., infiltration depth limited to the mucosa,
G1-G2, without LVI), and <2% in low risk submucosal EAC (i.e., infiltration depth <500μm,
good to moderate differentiation grade (G1-G2), without LVI). In high risk submucosal EAC
(i.e., infiltration depth ≥500 μm, and/or G3-G4, and/or LVI), the LNM risk is estimated to be
much higher (16-44%). Nevertheless, these numbers are mainly based on old surgical series.
Current data is limited in terms of small and heterogeneous patient cohorts, and data for
patients with high risk T1a EAC is not available at all. Therefore, we would like to conduct
an international multicenter retrospective cohort study in >10 centers to evaluate the safety
and efficacy of endoscopic treatment and follow-up of patients with high risk mucosal and
submucosal EAC. Our main focus will be the presence of lymph node metastasis and EAC related
death.
Aim of this registration study is to collect data of the above-mentioned group of patients
and thereby assess lymph node metastasis rate, disease-specific mortality, and overall
mortality.
This study will be conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and
in accordance with the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO), the Medical
Treatment Contracts Act (WGBO) and the Dutch Personal Data Protection Act (WBP). The
investigators will perform the study in accordance with this protocol and will make sure that
participants do not object to using their data. Collection, recording, and reporting of data
will be accurate and will ensure the privacy, health, and welfare of research subjects during
and after the study.