Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

Comparability of discontinuous non-invasive (sphygomanometric) and continuous semi-invasive and invasive (Masimo©; Nexfin© Monitoring ; FloTrac © Edwards Lifesciences) beat to beat measurement methods for the determination of cardiac output and fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.


Clinical Trial Description

Comparability of discontinuous non-invasive (sphygomanometric) and continuous semi-invasive and invasive (Masimo©; Nexfin© Monitoring ; FloTrac © Edwards Lifesciences) beat to beat measurement methods for the determination of cardiac output and fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.

Bariatric patients show limitations regarding the conventional monitoring options with ECG derivation, pulse oxymetric oxygen saturation and sphygmo-manometric blood pressure measurement. From a clinical point of view this results in an invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring. In addition to that, intraoperative extreme changes of the patients position on the table combined with the applied pneumoperitoneum during the minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery can significantly influence the cardiovascular parameters. An invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring is able to reproduce the blood pressure by stroke, but it does not give any information about the cardiac output. The sphygmomanometric blood pressure measurement also entails the risk of insufficient detection of a hypotonic phase in the measurement. Additional monitoring systems are currently available, which are capable of measuring completely non-invasive or semi-invasively different cardiovascular parameters such as cardiac output (CO) and volume responsiveness. In this study, the investigators will compare continuous and discontinuous cardiovascular monitoring procedures and their parameters. The measurements take place at specific times, under defined changes in the body position with the additional influence of the pneumoperitoneum.

These changes are recorded and compared at the same time during different measuring methods preoperatively, intraoperatively and postoperatively. The non-invasive Nexfin © Monitoring (Edwards Lifesciences) is to be evaluated and compared with further measurement methods (FloTrac © (Edwards Lifesciences)) as well as the sphygmomanometric upper arm blood pressure measurement. The investigators also compare the non-invasive and invasive continuous beat to beat blood pressure measurement with conventional, discontinuous sphygomanometric upper arm blood pressure measurement.

The planned study is the comparison of 3 different hemodynamic monitoring procedures. For the evaluation we use the method used by Bland and Altmann for calculating the mean deviation (bias) and the precision (mean value ± 2 standard deviations. In the case of multiple measurements , the modification of the Bland-Altman method is applied (repeated measurements). The number of cases was determined with n = 60 patients, followed by an intermediate evaluation. For a Bland-Altman analysis, the width w of the confidence interval for the Limits of Agreement is calculated as w = 6.79 • σ • 1 / √n, where n is number of cases and σ is the standard deviation. For a case count of n = 60, the result is w = 0.88 • σ and thus for this explorative study a sufficiently large number. In case of the dynamic variables, the percentage matching and the calculation of the kappa index are also used for the statistical evaluation. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT03184272
Study type Interventional
Source University of Schleswig-Holstein
Contact
Status Completed
Phase N/A
Start date June 1, 2015
Completion date June 1, 2017

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Not yet recruiting NCT04517591 - Reducing Sedentary Time in Bariatric: The Take a STAND for Health Study N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04433338 - The PREBA Study: Effect of Preoperative Weight Loss With a 14-day Low-calorie Diet on Surgical Procedure and Outcomes in Patients Undergoing RYGB Surgery N/A
Completed NCT05854875 - Diabetes Remission After RYGBP and RYGBP With Fundus Resection N/A
Recruiting NCT06460233 - Blood Pressure Changes After Bariatric Surgery
Completed NCT00535600 - Effects of Bariatric Surgery on Insulin
Withdrawn NCT04771247 - Endoscopic Cardiac Band Ligation for the Management of Refractory GERD After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03203161 - Registry on Obesity Surgery in Adolescents
Enrolling by invitation NCT02552433 - Complications in Body Contouring Surgery
Completed NCT02525016 - Safety Profile of IntRAvenous Lidocaine Use in Coelioscopic Bariatric Surgery Phase 3
Recruiting NCT01984762 - Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT01652105 - Randomized Trial of Preoperative Diets Before Bariatric Surgery N/A
Completed NCT00989157 - Effects of Gastric Bypass on Blood Levels of Duloxetine Phase 3
Completed NCT03609632 - Understanding Hypoglycaemia After Bariatric Surgery N/A
Completed NCT05454696 - Online Clinic Pilates Exercises in Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery N/A
Completed NCT04040647 - Tolerance of Early Postoperative Mobilization and Ambulation
Recruiting NCT04297306 - Virtual Reality Exercise Gaming in Patients Awaiting Bariatric Surgery N/A
Recruiting NCT05428618 - Mobile Application for Bariatric Surgery Patients N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03900481 - Use of an Endoluminal-suturing Device for Endoscopic Gastric Reduction as an Aid for Class I Obesity, or Class II Obesity Without Comorbidity N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03975244 - Semi-supervised Exercise Program Before Bariatric Surgery N/A
Recruiting NCT06157606 - Prediction Model for Inadequate Weight Loss After Sleeve Gastrectomy