Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Terminated

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03801356
Other study ID # 18-718
Secondary ID
Status Terminated
Phase Phase 4
First received
Last updated
Start date August 23, 2018
Est. completion date December 15, 2020

Study information

Verified date June 2023
Source The Cleveland Clinic
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

SNRB, as measured by the change in pain and objective functional ability, can solicit crucial information regarding a patient's clinical picture and can predict a patient's outcome post-surgery. By using the walk test as an objective functional assessment, the aim is to better standardize the threshold for a positive response to SNRB. In summary, SNRB, despite utilized frequently in the diagnostic work-up with patients with lumbar radiculopathy, vary widely in their sensitivity and specificity. The reasons, as outlined above, are multifactorial. The proposed study aims to minimize the known limitations of these injections and prospectively define their positive and negative predictive value in a homogenous group of patients undergoing surgery for lumbar foraminal stenosis and radiculopathy. The design will define a threshold of response utilizing both subjective and objective measures and more accurately predict excellent results following surgery.


Description:

The proposed study will identify the threshold response level that quantifies the predictive value of diagnostic SNRBs in patients who present with lumbar foraminal stenosis and radiculopathy. Specifically, the proposed study will address the question of whether there is a degree or length of response to SNRB, which predicts an excellent surgical outcome. The hypothesis is that diagnostic SNRBs, when performed correctly, are useful in localizing the level of involvement in LSS and improve the accuracy and efficacy of surgical intervention. Use of diagnostic SNRBs will thus be used to clarify the clinical picture, giving the surgeon the information to make the right decision to operate or not, and, in the case of operation, predicting the optimal level(s) for surgical intervention. In addition, the investigators plan to identify and fully characterize a standard threshold level and time of nerve block response that will optimize the accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity of SNRB in predicting surgical outcomes.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Terminated
Enrollment 11
Est. completion date December 15, 2020
Est. primary completion date November 5, 2020
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 80 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Ages 18-80 - Diagnosis of unilateral lower extremity radiculopathy due to degenerative foraminal stenosis - Patients scheduled for an associated lumbar foraminotomy procedure - Diagnosis of radiculopathy with imaging and/or clinical history or physical exam that does not demonstrate a clear neurogenic source of their pain - Subjects must be available for the entire study duration (12 months) Exclusion Criteria: - Patients will be excluded if there is a clear correlation between imaging and radiculopathy - Radiculopathy associated with trauma, tumor or infection. Non-radicular lower extremity pain will also be excluded - Patients who cannot tolerate the SNRB without IV sedation - Surgery requiring multi-level decompression and/or fusion - Surgical indication for malignancy, injection or acute or emergency trauma - History of major surgery within 3 months prior to enrollment - Pregnant females - Presence of severe acute, chronic medical or psychiatric condition

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Selective Nerve Root Block
Prior to single level foraminotomy for lumbar foraminal stenosis, patients will undergo SNRB of the suspected nerve root. Patients will undergo surgery despite the response to injection. Patients will complete an ambulation assessment immediately before and after the injection. Distance and time will be noted. Patients will be called within 48 hours of injection to determine response to injection, and recorded as Pre-and Post-injection VAS leg as well as duration of the response. Patients will be seen at 6 weeks, 3,6, and 12 months post-surgery and outcome measured by VAS-leg, ODI, PDQ and EQ-5D scores. Data will be used to determine the ideal improvement in leg pain and duration of improvement, predicting a statistical and meaningful improvement in leg pain following foramintomy.

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Cleveland Clinic Main Campus Cleveland Ohio

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
The Cleveland Clinic Lumbar Spine Research Society

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Leg Pain Score Aim: 0-2 point improvement
The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' (0) and 'pain as bad as it could be' (10). The patient is asked to mark their pain level on the line between the two endpoints. The distance and change between '0' and the mark then defines the subject's pain. This will be measured at each subject visit.
12-months
Secondary Oswestry Disability Index Questionnaire (ODI) Aim: 15-point improvement
The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders. The ODI is the most commonly outcome measures in patients with low back pain.
Structure / Content
There are 10 questions. The questions are designed in a way that to realize how the back or leg pain is affecting the patient's ability to manage in everyday life.
Scoring Method
Each of the 10 items is scored from 0 - 5. The maximum score is therefore 50. The score can be multiplied by 2 to produce a percentage.
If the FIRST statement is marked, the section score = 0, If the LAST statement is marked, it = 5
Interpretation
1.0%-20%: Minimal disability. Usually no treatment is indicated.
2.20%-40% Moderate disability
3.40%-60%: Severe disability
4.60%-80%: Crippled
5.80%-100%: These patients are either bed-bound or exaggerating their symptoms.
12-Months
Secondary EQ-5D Questionnaire Aim: Improvement in quality of life
The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. This decision results in a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state.
The questionnaire also records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints are labeled 'The best health you can imagine' and 'The worst health you can imagine'. The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflect the patient's own judgement.
12-Months
Secondary Pain Disability Questionnaire (PDQ) Aim: 26-point improvement
The Pain Disability Questionnaire (PDQ) assesses perception of disability in relation to pain.
PDQ scores: mild/moderate (0-70), severe (71-100), and extreme (101-150).
12-months
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05982483 - Erector Spinae Plane Block vs. Usual Care for ED Patients With Mechanical Back Pain N/A
Completed NCT04744246 - Muscle Activity During Load Carriage in ROTC Cadets N/A
Completed NCT03273114 - Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03680846 - Comparison of HF10 Therapy Combined With CMM to CMM Alone in the Treatment of Non-Surgical Refractory Back Pain N/A
Completed NCT05597189 - Clinical Study for Palliative/Preventive Treatment of Chronic Back Pain N/A
Completed NCT05342181 - Static and Dynamic Core Stability Exercises in Potpartum Back Pain N/A
Completed NCT02955342 - Back and Neck Pain in Adolescence
Not yet recruiting NCT02536274 - "Examination of the Impact of a Dynamic Flexion Orthosis (Dynaflex®Ottobock) or of a Back Bandage (Lumbo Sensa®Ottobock) on the Voluntary Activation of the Back Muscles in Patients With Specific Back Pain" N/A
Completed NCT02704845 - Biopsychosocial Exploration of Pain Profiles in Inflammatory and Chronic Non-specific Axial Low Back Pain N/A
Recruiting NCT02237105 - The Effect of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on the Outcome of Spinal Surgery N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT02485795 - Observational Study of the Impact of Genetic Testing on Healthcare Decisions and Care in Interventional Pain Management N/A
Terminated NCT02239627 - Epidural Clonidine Versus Corticosteroid for Low Back Pain N/A
Completed NCT02254694 - The Influence of High Heeled Shoes on the Sagittal Balance of the Spine and Whole Body N/A
Completed NCT02609009 - Back Pain and Spinal Manipulation in Adolescent Scoliosis N/A
Completed NCT00986180 - NUCYNTA (Tapentadol Immediate Release) Versus Oxycodone Immediate Release in the Treatment of Acute Low Back Pain Phase 3
Terminated NCT00769626 - Standardizing Management of Patients With Low Back Pain in Primary Care and Physical Therapy Phase 3
Completed NCT00771758 - Tapentadol IR vs Oxycodone IR vs Placebo in Acute Pain From Vertebral Compression Fracture Associated With Osteoporosis Phase 3
Withdrawn NCT00231374 - Measure of Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Pressure Variation With Patient Positioning N/A
Completed NCT00103675 - Sensor Measurement of Acupuncture Needle Manipulation Phase 1
Completed NCT00454064 - Cognitive-behavioural Treatment of Chronic Back Pain Phase 3