View clinical trials related to Back Pain.
Filter by:This is a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel group study of the efficacy and safety of tolperisone (a non-opioid) or placebo administered as multiple doses three times a day (TID) in approximately 400 male and female subjects experiencing back pain due to or associated with muscle spasm.
The aim of the study is to evaluate the reduction of pain by wearing the ATLAS Medical Device in standardized daily activities for patients with Chronic Low Back Pain. This is an intervention al non blinded study with a crossover design comparing pain evaluated with an Analogue Visual Scale with and without the ATLAS device during 5 standardized daily activities.
The intervention consists of a digital decision support system delivering a weekly plan of suggested activities that the participant can use to self-manage their low back pain (LBP) via an smartphone app.
This study evaluate the effectiveness that exists when performing a treatment based on a table of exercises for strengthening the lumbar muscles versus a treatment based on electropuncture in patients with chronic low back pain.
The primary focus of this study is to know the influence of sacroiliac joint manipulation on low back pain with or without radiation to lower limbs, in the lumbopelvic-hip joint
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of lumbopelvic stabilization on hamstrings muscle stretching in individuals with history of low back pain suspected to have a clinical lumbar instability.
Background: Standing trunk extension postures have been used for many years as a mechanical approach to low back pain (LBP), sometimes directed by therapeutic intervention, sometimes subconsciously performed by patientsto relieve LBP. However, no study to date has investigated the effect of standing trunk extension postures on spinal height and clinical outcome measures. Objective: The purpose of this study will be to evaluate in subjects with LBP following a period of trunk loading, how spinal height and/or pain, symptoms' centralization, and function outcome measures respond to:(1) standing repetitive trunk extension posture; and (2) standing sustained trunk extension posture. Lumbar range of motion (ROM) achieved during these two trunk extension postures will be compared to spinal height and outcome measures. Methods:A pre-test, post-test comparison group design (randomized clinical trial) will be used to determine how spinal height changes in response to sustained and repetitive standing trunk extension after a period of spinal loading. The study will evaluate the effects of sustained and repetitive trunk extension in standing on spinal height, pain, symptoms' centralization and function. Statistical Analysis: A mixed ANOVA will be used to statistically identify significant interactions and main effects for spinal height, pain and functionoutcome measures. Post-hoc pairwise comparisons will be used to locate significant differences between the different conditions. Significance will be set at α = 0.05. The Kruskal-Wallis 1-factor ANOVA for difference scores will used to determine changes of intensity and location of symptoms following sustained versus repetitive standing trunk extension. Spearman Rank correlation will be used to evaluate the relationship between spinal height changes and changes of pain and location of symptoms for each group.
Changing patients' position in the bed after TACE can decrease the level of back pain without increasing the amount of bleeding and hematoma,bring patients some comfort and relieving abdominal bloating, increase patients' satisfaction.
Muscle endurance will be evaluated on two exercises: Biering-Sorensen Test and Prone Plank Test. Each test will be assessed in different days following a randomized order.
Background: Low back pain (LBP) is still a frequent health problem. Recurrance of symptoms leads to high absence at work. It was proved in previous studies that low back manual massage has a significant impact on pain reduction. Trabert current (TC) is common physical modality used in rehabilitation of patients with LBP. The aim of study was to assess the effectiveness of manual massage in comparison to TC in patients with LBP. Methods: Sixty patients with LBP were enrolled in to the study. In all patients discopathy and spondyloarthrosis were diagnosed. The subjects were randomly assigned to two groups: massage (I=30) and TC (II=30) therapy. The procedures were performed for ten days. Pain intensity was assessed by Numerical Rating Scale. Quality of life and the degree of disability were evaluated by Oswestry Disability Index and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Results: In both groups pain reduction and functional improvement were observed after therapy. However, better results were noticed in group I.