Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03146260
Other study ID # IRB000087987
Secondary ID
Status Not yet recruiting
Phase N/A
First received May 6, 2017
Last updated September 27, 2017
Start date September 2017
Est. completion date December 2019

Study information

Verified date August 2017
Source Assiut University
Contact Mohammad A Saad, Msc
Phone 01002438659
Email dr.abas85@gmail.com
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Azoospermia is complete absence of sperm in the ejaculate. It accounts for 10-15% of male infertility cases. It is classified as obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). NOA constitutes 60% of all cases of azoospermia. Testicular sperm extraction (TESE) for intracytoplas¬mic sperm injection (ICSI) was first introduced for treatment of obstructive azoospermia in 1993. Soon afterwards testicular sperm were retrieved successfully and used in ICSI in cases of NOA. In the NOA cases, TESE combined with ICSI has been proven to be an acceptable line of treatment. Microdissection TESE may have some theoretical benefits over conventional TESE, but uncertainty exists about its superiority. During a conventional TESE procedure, the testis is exposed through a small incision and one or multiple biopsies are taken blindly. Micro TESE was first introduced in 1999. In this technique, the tunica albuginea is widely opened and examination of the testicular tissue is carried out at 20-25× magnification under an operating microscope allowing visualization of whitish, larger and more opaque tubuli. The concept of this technique is that these tubuli are more likely to contain active spermatogenesis. also no secure clinical predictors of (SR) are demonstrated for both procedures.The recovery of spermatozoa is successful in only 50% of cases and therefore the ability to predict those patients with a high probability of achieving a successful sperm retrieval would be of great value in counselling the patient and his partner . There is no single clinical finding or investigation that can accurately predict the outcome of TESE.An unsuccessful sperm recovery has important emotional and financial implications so objective counselling based on predictive factors may offer realistic expectations for both the couple and physician.


Description:

In Assiut university


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Not yet recruiting
Enrollment 148
Est. completion date December 2019
Est. primary completion date September 2019
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Male
Age group 20 Years to 55 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- All infertile males with non-obstructive azoospermia

Exclusion Criteria:

- Patient with obstructive azoospermia:

- Normal FSH

- Dilated seminal vesicle or ejaculatory duct

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Conventional TESE
usual procedure for sperm extraction
Microdissection TESE
Procedure of extraction is performed under the operating microscope

Locations

Country Name City State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Assiut University

References & Publications (2)

Abdel Raheem A, Garaffa G, Rushwan N, De Luca F, Zacharakis E, Abdel Raheem T, Freeman A, Serhal P, Harper JC, Ralph D. Testicular histopathology as a predictor of a positive sperm retrieval in men with non-obstructive azoospermia. BJU Int. 2013 Mar;111(3):492-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11203.x. Epub 2012 May 15. — View Citation

Cissen M, Meijerink AM, D'Hauwers KW, Meissner A, van der Weide N, Mochtar MH, de Melker AA, Ramos L, Repping S, Braat DD, Fleischer K, van Wely M. Prediction model for obtaining spermatozoa with testicular sperm extraction in men with non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod. 2016 Sep;31(9):1934-41. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew147. Epub 2016 Jul 12. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary prediction model for success of sperm retrieval by TESE in non obstructive azospermic patients Descriptive statistics for the studied sample will be used as needed. Evaluation of the predictors of sperm retrieval success will be done through a binary logistic regression analysis. within one hour from the start of the procedure .
Secondary Complications Comparison between conventional TESE and micro TESE as regard complications within three months
Secondary sperm retreival rate comparison between two procedures as regard retrieval rate. within procedure by biological search for sperms in retrieved specimens.
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT03809026 - The Potential of Sperm Retrieved by Micro-TESE to Fertilize Vitrified/Warmed Oocytes
Active, not recruiting NCT03291522 - Retrieval of Sperm From Men With Azoospermia Using Ultrasound-guided Rete Testis Aspiration
Completed NCT05483621 - Hormonal Stimulation of Spermatogenesis Phase 1
Completed NCT06358794 - Machine Learning Based-Personalized Prediction of Sperm Retrieval Success Rate
Recruiting NCT06181851 - 2015-Metabolomics&Microbiome-infertility
Completed NCT04237779 - The Effects of Intratesticular PRP Injection in Men With Azoospermia or Cryptozoospermia N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03615547 - Interest of Clomiphene Citrate in Patients With Non-obstructive Azoospermia on the Quantity of Sperm Cells Phase 3
Completed NCT04397887 - Seminal TEX101 as a Predictor of Recovery of Spermatogenesis in Azoospermic Men With Palpable Varicocele N/A
Completed NCT02900105 - Effect of Letrozole on Seminal Parameters in Men With Non Obstructive Azoospermia and Severe Oligozoospermia. Phase 3
Not yet recruiting NCT03857828 - Seminal Level of Clusterin Before Testicular Sperm Extraction