View clinical trials related to Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.
Filter by:Antecedents: electrical isolation of pulmonary veins is the standard treatment for patients with atrial fibrillation. However, its efficacy is lower in persistent and chronic forms of this arrhythmia compared to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Many complementary techniques have been proposed, that added to pulmonary veins isolation, may reduce the recurrence rate of atrial fibrillation. However, none of them has obtained consistent results. Linear ablation aims to parcellate and modify the left atrial substrate responsible for atrial fibrillation maintenance. Previous studies have offered contradictory results using linear ablation. Methods: SUPAFER is a multicenter, 1:1 randomized clinical trial that compares the efficacy of pulmonary veins isolation alone vs pulmonary vein isolation plus an specific protocol of left atrial linear ablation. Contrary to previous studies, the specific SUPAFER linear ablation is systematic, homogeneous and target atrial areas that have not been systematically ablated in previous trials. The trial aims at demonstrating the superiority of the combined ablative approach during 1-year follow-up. Daily transtelephonic ECG samples a 30 days continuous ECG monitoring are used to maximize de detection of recurrences, even asymptomatic.
Transvenous pulmonary vein (PV) isolation using radiofrequency energy is an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (1-4). However, rare but potentially life threatening complications such as thromboembolism (5), PV stenosis (5-10), left atrium-oesophageal fistula (11) and inflammatory syndromes (12) have been described. In preliminary studies an alternate approach using cryoenergy induces less endothelial disruption/ thrombus formation (13), preserves the extra cellular matrix and creates lesions with well-delineated border zones (14). Therefore, cryoenergy seems to be the ideal form of energy to safely perform PV isolation. We therefore hypothesise that in the setting of PV isolation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) cryoenergy is less traumatic and therefore reduces systemic inflammatory responses compared to radiofrequency energy. 78 patients presenting with symptomatic intermittent or persistent AF will be randomised to PV isolation with either radiofrequency (26 patients open irrigated tip, 26 patients closed irrigated tip) or cryoenergy (26 patients with cryoballoon). Systemic markers of cell damage and inflammatory response (t-troponin, CK, CK-MB, vWF, PAI-1, micro particles, platelet activation/overall function, CRP, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, TNF alpha, procalcitonin) will be monitored before, during and 48h after the procedure. Further endpoints include time to PV-isolation and procedure related complications. Six month clinical follow-up will focus on freedom from AF and cardiovascular events.