Arthrofibrosis Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Feasibility Study Considering the Use of the STAK Tool in Addition to Standard Physiotherapy Compared to Standard Physiotherapy Alone to Treat Arthrofibrosis Patients Following Total Knee Replacement
A common complication following total knee replacement (TKR) is arthrofibrosis, a severe
stiffening of the knee caused by scar tissue.
The aims of this mixed methods feasibility study are to (1) record the effect of use of the
STAK Tool on knee flexion active range of movement (KROM) immediately following 8 weeks use
and 6 months following use, (2) explore patients' experiences of arthrofibrosis and use of
the STAK Tool, (3) Consider appropriate outcome measures (e.g. KROM, patient
experience/acceptability, The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index
(WOMAC), Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and other clinical measures and (4) design a protocol to
evaluate the effectiveness of the STAK Tool.
Arthrofibrosis most commonly occurs after total knee replacement (TKR), extensive
intra-articular injury or surgical procedures, for example fracture of the proximal tibia or
distal femur or multiple ligament reconstructions (Creighton and Bach 2012). Arthrofibrosis
involves a severe stiffening of the knee caused by scar tissue. This often results in a lack
of crucial range of knee flexion movement. Traditional physiotherapy treatment includes a
home exercise programme involving regular intense stretches and mobilisations delivered by
the physiotherapist at the hospital aiming to enable the patient to regain optimal,
functional knee bend. The inflammatory process and remodeling of soft tissues following
trauma can lead to production of scar tissue and subsequent stiffness. This results in
increased pain and difficulty in performing exercises. This often limits progress requiring
high numbers of physiotherapy sessions and potentially further surgery (manipulation under
anaesthetic) to restore range of movement.
The STAK Tool enables the patient to perform intense self-stretching of the knee more easily
and effectively. Intense stretching is essential to increase KROM (Bonutti et al 2008,
Bonutti 2010, Papotto et al 2012, Stephenson et al 2010). Patients who fall into the category
of having restricted KROM (less than 70 degrees flexion) and those whose Clinicians identify
them as requiring further intensive physiotherapy to address their stiffness would be
approached to take part in this study. 36 participants would be recruited. Participants would
be over 18 years old, between 44kg and 159kg. This mixed methods feasibility study would
investigate patients' progress and outcomes in overcoming arthrofibrosis using the STAK Tool
a medical stretching device at home plus standard physiotherapy treatment (intervention
group), compared to patients receiving physiotherapy treatment only (comparative group).
Participants would be allocated into either the intervention or comparative group.
Participants would be instructed to use the STAK Tool for 5-10 minute periods for a minimum
total of 20 minutes and maximum of 60 minutes a day.
Participants would receive their standard physiotherapy treatment including KROM, full weight
bearing exercises including sit to stands, squats, body weight assisted passive stretches,
strengthening exercises and mobilisations. Angle of knee flexion would be measured
(standardised method) by the Principal Investigator and the WOMAC and OKS are administered on
the day the participant consents to the study (Visit 1), the day the intervention starts.
This will be within approximately 2 weeks of the patient being identified by their clinician.
(The Principal investigator will visit the participant within 10 days to ensure there are no
problems using the STAK Tool (Visit 2 - only intervention group). During Visit 1 an interview
(interview 1), would be conducted to explore the patients' initial thoughts on the STAK Tool
after being introduced to it. Both the intervention and comparative groups will have their
KROM recorded using two different measuring instruments, the universal goniometer and the
Hudl Ubersense App. Outcome measures including KROM, WOMAC and OKS will be recorded again
following approximately 8 weeks treatment (dependent on time available before manipulation as
per normal clinical care), at either the patient's final follow-up with their Clinician or at
their home (Visit 3) (end of intervention). The WOMAC and OKS would help to ascertain the
patient's perceptions of pain, stiffness and functional improvements. At Visit 3 participants
would also complete a questionnaire regarding the frequency of knee stretching exercise
completed and how easy/difficult it had been to achieve. On completing 8 weeks standard
treatment patients in the comparative group who were deemed eligibility by their Clinician
would be offered the STAK Tool 8 week treatment.
Visits would then be completed as per the intervention group minus the interviews.
An in-depth semi-structured interview (interview 2) will be conducted with participants in
the intervention group exploring their thoughts and experiences of using the STAK Tool to
increase their knee flexion, their perceived progress and acceptability of the device.
A follow up meeting (Visit 4) would take place at 6 months after Visit 3, this would take
place at the participant's home patients KROM, WOMAC and OKS would be recorded to provide
data relating to participants long term outcomes.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Withdrawn |
NCT05157464 -
Losartan Use to Mitigate Arthrofibrosis Following Total Join Arthroplasty
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04082533 -
Intravenous (IV) Hydrocortisone for TKA (Total Knee Arthroplasty)
|
Phase 4 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03598829 -
A Prospective Clinical Trial Comparing Serum Mast Cell Tryptase (SMCT) Levels to Arthrofibrosis Rates Among Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) Patients
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04360928 -
Knee Split Comparison After ACL Reconstruction
|
N/A |