Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04134728
Other study ID # 202018
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 3
First received
Last updated
Start date October 31, 2019
Est. completion date February 1, 2022

Study information

Verified date July 2023
Source GlaxoSmithKline
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study (contRAst 3 [202018: NCT04134728]) is a Phase 3, randomized, multicenter, double-blind study to assess the safety and efficacy of GSK3196165 in combination with conventional (cs) DMARD[s]) or the treatment of adult participants with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have had an inadequate response to biologic (b) DMARD[s]) and/or JAK inhibitors. The study will consist of a screening phase of up to 6 weeks followed by 24 week treatment phase in which participants will be randomized in ratio of 6:6:6:1:1:1 to GSK3196165 150 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously (SC) weekly,GSK3196165 90 mg SC weekly, sarilumab 200 mg SC every other week or placebo (three arms) respectively, all in combination with background csDMARD(s). At Week 12, participants in the three placebo arms will switch from placebo to active intervention (either GSK3196165 150 mg SC weekly, GSK3196165 90 mg SC weekly, or sarilumab 200 mg SC every other week). Participants who, in investigator's judgement will benefit from extended treatment with GSK3196165, may be included in the long-term extension study (contRAst X [209564: NCT04333147]). Any participant who does not transition into study 209564 will undergo a safety follow-up visit at Week 34 (corresponding to 12 weeks after the last potential dose of sarilumab, at Week 22).


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 550
Est. completion date February 1, 2022
Est. primary completion date September 15, 2021
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Key inclusion criteria: - >=18 years of age - Has had RA for >=6 months and was not diagnosed before 16 years of age - Has active disease, as defined by having both:* - >=6/68 tender/painful joints (tender joint count [TJC]), and - >=6/66 swollen joints (swollen joint count [SJC]) - Has had an inadequate response despite currently taking at least one and at the most two concomitant csDMARDs for at least 12 weeks, from the following: - Methotrexate (MTX) - Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine - Sulfasalazine - Leflunomide - Bucillamine - Iguratimod - Tacrolimus - Has had inadequate response to at least one bDMARD at an approved dose and/or at least one JAK inhibitors at an approved dose. In both cases this may be with or without combination with a csDMARD. - If surgical treatment of a joint has been performed, that joint cannot be counted in the TJC or SJC. Key exclusion criteria: - Has had any active and/or recurrent infections (excluding recurrent fungal infections of the nail bed) or has required management of acute or chronic infections. - Has received prior treatment with an antagonist of GM-CSF or its receptor. - Has known infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or current acute or chronic hepatitis B and/or hepatitis C.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Biological:
GSK3196165 (Otilimab)
GSK3196165 solution in vial/pre-filled syringe (PFS) to be administered SC.
Sarilumab
Sarilumab solution in PFS to be administered SC.
Drug:
Placebo to GSK3196165/ Sarilumab
Placebo sterile 0.9 percentage (%) weight by volume (w/v) sodium chloride solution in vial/PFS to be administered SC.
csDMARDs
Stable dose of csDMARD(s) as SoC.

Locations

Country Name City State
Argentina GSK Investigational Site Buenos Aires
Argentina GSK Investigational Site Ciudad Autonoma Buenos aires Buenos Aires
Argentina GSK Investigational Site Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires Buenos Aires
Argentina GSK Investigational Site Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires Buenos Aires
Argentina GSK Investigational Site Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires
Argentina GSK Investigational Site Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires
Argentina GSK Investigational Site La Palta Buenos Aires
Argentina GSK Investigational Site Mar del Plata Buenos Aires
Argentina GSK Investigational Site San Isidro Buenos Aires
Argentina GSK Investigational Site San Juan
Argentina GSK Investigational Site San Nicolas Buenos Aires
Belgium GSK Investigational Site Mons
Canada GSK Investigational Site Barrie Ontario
Canada GSK Investigational Site Brampton Ontario
Canada GSK Investigational Site Trois-Rivieres Quebec
Czechia GSK Investigational Site Brno
Czechia GSK Investigational Site Brno
Czechia GSK Investigational Site Ostrava
Czechia GSK Investigational Site Praha 11
Czechia GSK Investigational Site Praha 2
Czechia GSK Investigational Site Praha 5
Czechia GSK Investigational Site Uherske Hradiste
Czechia GSK Investigational Site Zlin
Germany GSK Investigational Site Hamburg
Germany GSK Investigational Site Magdeburg
Germany GSK Investigational Site Rendsburg Schleswig-Holstein
Hungary GSK Investigational Site Budapest
Hungary GSK Investigational Site Szekesfehervar
Hungary GSK Investigational Site Veszprem
Italy GSK Investigational Site Verona Veneto
Japan GSK Investigational Site Aichi
Japan GSK Investigational Site Aichi
Japan GSK Investigational Site Aichi
Japan GSK Investigational Site Chiba
Japan GSK Investigational Site Fukuoka
Japan GSK Investigational Site Hokkaido
Japan GSK Investigational Site Hokkaido
Japan GSK Investigational Site Hyogo
Japan GSK Investigational Site Hyogo
Japan GSK Investigational Site Ibaraki
Japan GSK Investigational Site Kagoshima
Japan GSK Investigational Site Kanagawa
Japan GSK Investigational Site Kochi
Japan GSK Investigational Site Kumamoto
Japan GSK Investigational Site Miyagi
Japan GSK Investigational Site Nagasaki
Japan GSK Investigational Site Saitama
Japan GSK Investigational Site Tokyo
Japan GSK Investigational Site Tokyo
Korea, Republic of GSK Investigational Site Incheon
Korea, Republic of GSK Investigational Site Seoul
Korea, Republic of GSK Investigational Site Seoul
Korea, Republic of GSK Investigational Site Seoul
Lithuania GSK Investigational Site Klaipeda
Lithuania GSK Investigational Site Siauliai
Poland GSK Investigational Site Bialystok
Poland GSK Investigational Site Bydgoszcz
Poland GSK Investigational Site Gdansk
Poland GSK Investigational Site Gdynia
Poland GSK Investigational Site Katowice
Poland GSK Investigational Site Katowice
Poland GSK Investigational Site Kraków
Poland GSK Investigational Site Lodz
Poland GSK Investigational Site Poznan
Poland GSK Investigational Site Poznan
Poland GSK Investigational Site Sochaczew
Poland GSK Investigational Site Torun
Poland GSK Investigational Site Warszawa
Poland GSK Investigational Site Warszawa
Poland GSK Investigational Site Warszawa
Poland GSK Investigational Site Warszawa
Poland GSK Investigational Site Wroclaw
South Africa GSK Investigational Site Cape Town
South Africa GSK Investigational Site Durban KwaZulu- Natal
South Africa GSK Investigational Site Kempton Park
South Africa GSK Investigational Site Pretoria
South Africa GSK Investigational Site Pretoria Gauteng
South Africa GSK Investigational Site Stellenbosch
Spain GSK Investigational Site A Coruña
Spain GSK Investigational Site Elche
Spain GSK Investigational Site Santander
Spain GSK Investigational Site Santiago de Compostela
Spain GSK Investigational Site Valencia
United Kingdom GSK Investigational Site Northwood Middlesex
United Kingdom GSK Investigational Site Romford Essex
United States GSK Investigational Site Atlanta Georgia
United States GSK Investigational Site Austin Texas
United States GSK Investigational Site Baytown Texas
United States GSK Investigational Site Brandon Florida
United States GSK Investigational Site Chicago Illinois
United States GSK Investigational Site Cincinnati Ohio
United States GSK Investigational Site College Station Texas
United States GSK Investigational Site Colleyville Texas
United States GSK Investigational Site Covina California
United States GSK Investigational Site Dayton Ohio
United States GSK Investigational Site DeBary Florida
United States GSK Investigational Site Greenville South Carolina
United States GSK Investigational Site Houston Texas
United States GSK Investigational Site Houston Texas
United States GSK Investigational Site Houston Texas
United States GSK Investigational Site Jacksonville Florida
United States GSK Investigational Site Lebanon New Hampshire
United States GSK Investigational Site Lincoln Nebraska
United States GSK Investigational Site Lubbock Texas
United States GSK Investigational Site Mesa Arizona
United States GSK Investigational Site Miami Florida
United States GSK Investigational Site Miami Florida
United States GSK Investigational Site Miami Florida
United States GSK Investigational Site Miami Florida
United States GSK Investigational Site Miami Lakes Florida
United States GSK Investigational Site Minot North Dakota
United States GSK Investigational Site Newnan Georgia
United States GSK Investigational Site Oklahoma City Oklahoma
United States GSK Investigational Site Oklahoma City Oklahoma
United States GSK Investigational Site Phoenix Arizona
United States GSK Investigational Site Plano Texas
United States GSK Investigational Site Saint Louis Missouri
United States GSK Investigational Site San Antonio Texas
United States GSK Investigational Site San Diego California
United States GSK Investigational Site San Marcos Texas
United States GSK Investigational Site Skokie Illinois
United States GSK Investigational Site Sun City Arizona
United States GSK Investigational Site Tampa Florida
United States GSK Investigational Site Tampa Florida
United States GSK Investigational Site The Woodlands Texas
United States GSK Investigational Site Tomball Texas
United States GSK Investigational Site Tucson Arizona
United States GSK Investigational Site Tujunga California
United States GSK Investigational Site Upland California
United States GSK Investigational Site Waco Texas
United States GSK Investigational Site Whittier California

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
GlaxoSmithKline Iqvia Pty Ltd

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  Argentina,  Belgium,  Canada,  Czechia,  Germany,  Hungary,  Italy,  Japan,  Korea, Republic of,  Lithuania,  Poland,  South Africa,  Spain,  United Kingdom, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Other Change From Baseline 4-beta-hydroxy Cholesterol, Cholesterol at (Millimoles Per Liter) Week 12 Blood samples was collected for the assessment of change from baseline in lipid profile parameter including 4-beta-hydroxycholesterol, cholesterol levels. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms. Baseline (Day 01) and Week 12
Other Change From Baseline 4-beta-hydroxy Cholesterol, Cholesterol at (Millimoles Per Liter) Week 24 for Treatment Arms That Started Study Intervention From Day 1 Blood samples was collected for the assessment of change from baseline in lipid profile parameter including 4-beta-hydroxycholesterol, cholesterol levels. Baseline (Day 01) and Week 24
Other Change From Baseline 4-beta-hydroxy Cholesterol, Cholesterol at (Millimoles Per Liter) Week 24 for Placebo Switched Arms That Started Study Intervention From Week 12 Blood samples was collected for the assessment of change from baseline in lipid profile parameter including 4-beta-hydroxycholesterol, cholesterol levels. Baseline (Week 12) and Week 24
Primary Percentage of Participants With 20% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR20) at Week 12 Superiority Comparison With Placebo ACR20 is calculated as a 20% improvement from Baseline in Tender Joint Count 68 (TJC68) and Swollen Joint Count 66 (SJC66) and a 20% improvement in 3 of the following 5 measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale (VAS) with values from 0=best to 100=worst), Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) (VAS with values from 0=best to 100=worst), Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain (VAS with values from 0=no pain and 100=most severe pain), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (ranges from 0 to 3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty) and an acute-phase reactant (high sensitivity C-reactive Protein mg/L (hsCRP)). For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms. Week 12
Secondary Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (Versus Placebo) at Week 12 Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) is a 20-question instrument that assesses the difficulty of a participant in eight domains of daily living activities: Dressing & grooming, Arising, Eating, Walking, Hygiene, Reach, Grip, Common daily activities. Overall HAQ-DI score was computed as the sum of the domain scores divided by the number of domains answered. The total possible score ranges from 0 to 3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty. Higher overall score indicates greater disability. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms. Baseline (Day 01) and Week 12
Secondary Percentage of Participants With Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Total Score <=10 (CDAI Low Disease Activity [LDA]) at Week 12 Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) total score is a composite score consisting of the sum of Swollen Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst) and Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). CDAI total score ranges from 0 to 76 with higher values representing higher disease activity. Low disease activity (LDA) is achieved when CDAI total score <=10. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms. Week 12
Secondary Percentage of Participants With CDAI Total Score <=10 (CDAI LDA) at Week 24 for Treatment Arms That Started Study Intervention From Day 1 Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) total score is a composite score consisting of the sum of Swollen Joint Count 28 (TJC28),Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst) and Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). CDAI total score ranges from 0 to 76 with higher values representing higher disease activity. LDA is achieved when CDAI total score <=10. Week 24
Secondary Percentage of Participants With CDAI Total Score <=10 (CDAI LDA) at Week 24 for Placebo Switched Arms That Started Study Intervention From Week 12 Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) total score is a composite score consisting of the sum of Swollen Joint Count 28 (TJC28),Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst) and Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). CDAI total score ranges from 0 to 76 with higher values representing higher disease activity. LDA is achieved when CDAI total score <=10. Week 24
Secondary Change From Baseline in CDAI Total Score at Week 12 Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) total score is a composite score consisting of the sum of Swollen Joint Count 28 (TJC28),Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst) and Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). CDAI total score ranges from 0 to 76 with higher values representing higher disease activity. A negative CDAI total score change from baseline indicates an improvement in disease activity. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms. Baseline (Day 01) and Week 12
Secondary Change From Baseline in CDAI Total Score at Week 24 for Treatment Arms That Started Study Intervention From Day 1 Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) total score is a composite score consisting of the sum of Swollen Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst) and Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). CDAI total score ranges from 0 to 76 with higher values representing higher disease activity. Baseline (Day 01) and Week 24
Secondary Change From Baseline in CDAI Total Score at Week 24 for Placebo Switched Arms That Started Study Intervention From Week 12 Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) total score is a composite score consisting of the sum of Swollen Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst) and Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). CDAI total score ranges from 0 to 76 with higher values representing higher disease activity. Baseline (Day 01) and Week 24
Secondary Change From Baseline in Arthritis Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 12 For the Arthritis Pain VAS, participants assess the severity of their current arthritis pain using a continuous visual analogue scale (VAS) with anchors at "0" (no pain) and "100" (most severe pain). A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms. Baseline (Day 01) and Week 12
Secondary Change From Baseline in Arthritis Pain VAS at Week 24 for Treatment Arms That Started Study Intervention From Day 1 For the Arthritis Pain VAS, participants assess the severity of their current arthritis pain using a continuous visual analogue scale (VAS) with anchors at "0" (no pain) and "100" (most severe pain). A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement. Baseline (Day 01) and Week 24
Secondary Change From Baseline in Arthritis Pain VAS at Week 24 for Placebo Switched Arms That Started Study Intervention From Week 12 For the Arthritis Pain VAS, participants assess the severity of their current arthritis pain using a continuous visual analogue scale (VAS) with anchors at "0" (no pain) and "100" (most severe pain). A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement. Baseline (Day 01) and Week 24
Secondary Percentage of Participants With CDAI Total Score <=2.8 (CDAI Remission) at Week 12 Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) total score is a composite score consisting of the sum of Swollen Joint Count 28 (TJC28),Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst) and Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). CDAI total score ranges from 0 to 76 with higher values representing higher disease activity. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms. Week 12
Secondary Percentage of Participants With CDAI Total Score <=2.8 (CDAI Remission) at Week 24 for Treatment Arms That Started Study Intervention From Day 1 Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) total score is a composite score consisting of the sum of Swollen Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst) and Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). CDAI total score ranges from 0 to 76 with higher values representing higher disease activity. Week 24
Secondary Percentage of Participants With CDAI Total Score <=2.8 (CDAI Remission) at Week 24 for Placebo Switched Arms That Started Study Intervention From Week 12 Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) total score is a composite score consisting of the sum of Swollen Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst) and Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). CDAI total score ranges from 0 to 76 with higher values representing higher disease activity. Week 24
Secondary Percentage of Participants With ACR20 at Week 24 for Treatment Arms That Started Study Intervention From Day 1 ACR20 is calculated as a 20% improvement from Baseline in TJC68 and SJC66 and a 20% improvement in 3 of the following 5 measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA), Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) (VAS values from 0=best to 100=worst), Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain (VAS values from 0=no pain to 100=most severe pain), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (0=least difficulty to 3=extreme difficulty) and an acute-phase reactant (high sensitivity C-reactive Protein mg/L (hsCRP). Week 24
Secondary Percentage of Participants With ACR20 at Week 24 for Placebo Switched Arms That Started Study Intervention From Week 12 ACR20 is calculated as a 20% improvement from Baseline in TJC68 and SJC66 and a 20% improvement in 3 of the following 5 measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA), Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) (VAS values from 0=best to 100=worst), Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain (VAS values from 0=no pain to 100=most severe pain), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (0=least difficulty to 3=extreme difficulty) and an acute-phase reactant (high sensitivity C-reactive Protein mg/L (hsCRP). Week 24
Secondary Percentage of Participants With 50% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR50) at Week 12 ACR50 is calculated as a 50% improvement from Baseline in Tender Joint Count 68 (TJC68) and Swollen Joint Count 66 (SJC66) and a 50% improvement in 3 of the following 5 measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale (VAS) with values from 0=best to 100=worst), Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) (VAS with values from 0=best to 100=worst), Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain (VAS with values from 0=no pain and 100=most severe pain), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (ranges from 0 to 3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty) and an acute-phase reactant (high sensitivity C-reactive Protein mg/L (hsCRP)). For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms. Week 12
Secondary Percentage of Participants With ACR50 at Week 24 for Treatment Arms That Started Study Intervention From Day 1 ACR50 is calculated as a 50% improvement from Baseline in TJC68 and SJC66 and a 50% improvement in 3 of the following 5 measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA), Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) (VAS values from 0=best to 100=worst), Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain (VAS values from 0=no pain to 100=most severe pain), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (0=least difficulty to 3=extreme difficulty) and an acute-phase reactant (high sensitivity C-reactive Protein mg/L (hsCRP). Week 24
Secondary Percentage of Participants With ACR50 at Week 24 for Placebo Switched Arms That Started Study Intervention From Week 12 ACR50 is calculated as a 50% improvement from Baseline in TJC68 and SJC66 and a 50% improvement in 3 of the following 5 measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA), Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) (VAS values from 0=best to 100=worst), Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain (VAS values from 0=no pain to 100=most severe pain), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (0=least difficulty to 3=extreme difficulty) and an acute-phase reactant (high sensitivity C-reactive Protein mg/L (hsCRP). Week 24
Secondary Percentage of Participants With 70% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR70) at Week 12 ACR70 is calculated as a 70% improvement from Baseline in Tender Joint Count 68 (TJC68) and Swollen Joint Count 66 (SJC66) and a 70% improvement in 3 of the following 5 measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale (VAS) with values from 0=best to 100=worst), Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) (VAS with values from 0=best to 100=worst), Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain (VAS with values from 0=no pain and 100=most severe pain), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (ranges from 0 to 3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty) and an acute-phase reactant (high sensitivity C-reactive Protein mg/L (hsCRP)). For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms. Week 12
Secondary Percentage of Participants With ACR70 at Week 24 for Treatment Arms That Started Study Intervention From Day 1 ACR70 is calculated as a 70% improvement from Baseline in TJC68 and SJC66 and a 70% improvement in 3 of the following 5 measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA), Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) (VAS values from 0=best to 100=worst), Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain (VAS values from 0=no pain to 100=most severe pain), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (0=least difficulty to 3=extreme difficulty) and an acute-phase reactant (high sensitivity C-reactive Protein mg/L (hsCRP). Week 24
Secondary Percentage of Participants With ACR70 at Week 24 for Placebo Switched Arms That Started Study Intervention From Week 12 ACR70 is calculated as a 70% improvement from Baseline in TJC68 and SJC66 and a 70% improvement in 3 of the following 5 measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA), Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) (VAS values from 0=best to 100=worst), Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain (VAS values from 0=no pain to 100=most severe pain), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (0=least difficulty to 3=extreme difficulty) and an acute-phase reactant (high sensitivity C-reactive Protein mg/L (hsCRP). Week 24
Secondary Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score Using 28 Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) <=3.2 (DAS28-CRP LDA) at Week 12 The DAS28-CRP is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), C-reactive protein (CRP) (in mg/L), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). DAS28-CRP scores range from 1.0 to 9.4, where lower scores indicates less disease activity. Low disease activity (LDA) is achieved when DAS28-CRP<=3.2. A negative change from baseline in DAS28-CRP indicates an improvement. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms. Week 12
Secondary Percentage of Participants With DAS28-CRP <=3.2 (DAS28-CRP LDA) at Week 24 for Treatment Arms That Started Study Intervention From Day 1 The DAS28-CRP is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), C-reactive protein (CRP) (in mg/L), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). DAS28-CRP scores range from 1.0 to 9.4, where lower scores indicates less disease activity. Low disease activity (LDA) is achieved when DAS28-CRP<=3.2 . A negative change from baseline in DAS28-CRP indicates an improvement. Week 24
Secondary Percentage of Participants With DAS28-CRP <=3.2 (DAS28-CRP LDA) at Week 24 for Placebo Switched Arms That Started Study Intervention From Week 12 The DAS28-CRP is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), C-reactive protein (CRP) (in mg/L), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). DAS28-CRP scores range from 1.0 to 9.4, where lower scores indicates less disease activity. Low disease activity (LDA) is achieved when DAS28-CRP<=3.2 . A negative change from baseline in DAS28-CRP indicates an improvement. Week 24
Secondary Percentage of Participants With DAS28 Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) <=3.2 (DAS28-ESR LDA) at Week 12 The DAS28-ESR is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (in mm/hr), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). DAS28-ESR scores range from 1.0 to 9.4, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. Low disease activity (LDA) is achieved when DAS28-ESR<=3.2. A negative change from baseline in DAS28-ESR indicates an improvement. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms. Week 12
Secondary Percentage of Participants With DAS28-ESR <=3.2 (DAS28-ESR LDA) at Week 24 for Treatment Arms That Started Study Intervention From Day 1 The DAS28-ESR is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (in mm/hr), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). DAS28-ESR scores range from 1.0 to 9.4, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. Low disease activity (LDA) is achieved when DAS28-ESR<=3.2. A negative change from baseline in DAS28-ESR indicates an improvement. Week 24
Secondary Percentage of Participants With DAS28-ESR <=3.2 (DAS28-ESR LDA) at Week 24 for Placebo Switched Arms That Started Study Intervention From Week 12 The DAS28-ESR is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (in mm/hr), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). DAS28-ESR scores range from 1.0 to 9.4, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. Low disease activity (LDA) is achieved when DAS28-ESR<=3.2. A negative change from baseline in DAS28-ESR indicates an improvement. Week 24
Secondary Percentage of Participants With DAS28-CRP <2.6 (DAS28-CRP Remission) at Week 12 The DAS28-CRP is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), C-reactive protein (CRP) (in mg/L), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). DAS28-CRP scores range from 1.0 to 9.4, where lower scores indicates less disease activity. Remission is achieved when DAS28-CRP <2.6. A negative change from baseline in DAS28-CRP indicates an improvement. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms. Week 12
Secondary Percentage of Participants With DAS28-CRP <2.6 (DAS28-CRP Remission) at Week 24 for Treatment Arms That Started Study Intervention From Day 1 The DAS28-CRP arthritis is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), C-reactive protein (CRP) (in mg/L), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). DAS28-CRP scores range from 1.0 to 9.4, where lower scores indicates less disease activity. Remission is achieved when DAS28-CRP <2.6. A negative change from baseline in DAS28-CRP indicates an improvement. Week 24
Secondary Percentage of Participants With DAS28-CRP <2.6 (DAS28-CRP Remission) at Week 24 for Placebo Switched Arms That Started Study Intervention From Week 12 The DAS28-CRP arthritis is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), C-reactive protein (CRP) (in mg/L), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). DAS28-CRP scores range from 1.0 to 9.4, where lower scores indicates less disease activity. Remission is achieved when DAS28-CRP <2.6. A negative change from baseline in DAS28-CRP indicates an improvement. Week 24
Secondary Percentage of Participants With DAS28-ESR <2.6 (DAS28-ESR Remission) at Week 12 The DAS28-ESR is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (in mm/hr), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). DAS28-ESR scores range from 1.0 to 9.4, where lower scores indicates less disease activity. Remission is achieved when DAS28-ESR <2.6. A negative change from baseline in DAS28-ESR indicates an improvement. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms. Week 12
Secondary Percentage of Participants With DAS28-ESR <2.6 (DAS28-ESR Remission) Week 24 for Treatment Arms That Started Study Intervention From Day 1 The DAS28-ESR is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (in mm/hr), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). DAS28-ESR scores range from 1.0 to 9.4, where lower scores indicates less disease activity. Remission is achieved when DAS28-ESR <2.6. A negative change from baseline in DAS28-ESR indicates an improvement. Week 24
Secondary Percentage of Participants With DAS28-ESR <2.6 (DAS28-ESR Remission) Week 24 for Placebo Switched Arms That Started Study Intervention From Week 12 The DAS28-ESR is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (in mm/hr), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). DAS28-ESR scores range from 1.0 to 9.4, where lower scores indicates less disease activity. Remission is achieved when DAS28-ESR <2.6. A negative change from baseline in DAS28-ESR indicates an improvement. Week 24
Secondary Percentage of Participants With a Good/Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Week 12 DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR scores categorized using EULAR response criteria. Response based on the combination of current DAS28 score and the improvement in the current DAS28 score relative to baseline (Good response = DAS28 change >1.2 with current DAS28 =3.2; Moderate response = DAS28 change >0.6 with current DAS28 >3.2-5.1; Non-response = DAS28 change =0.6 and current DAS28 >5.1). For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms. Week 12
Secondary Percentage of Participants With a Good/Moderate EULAR Response at Week 24 for Treatment Arms That Started Study Intervention From Day 1 DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR scores categorised using EULAR response criteria. Response based on the combination of current DAS28 score and the improvement in the current DAS28 score relative to baseline (Good response = DAS28 change >1.2 with current DAS28 =3.2; Moderate response = DAS28 change >0.6 with current DAS28 >3.2-5.1; Non-response = DAS28 change =0.6 and current DAS28 >5.1). Week 24
Secondary Percentage of Participants With a Good/Moderate EULAR Response at Week 24 for Placebo Switched Arms That Started Study Intervention From Week 12 DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR scores categorised using EULAR response criteria. Response based on the combination of current DAS28 score and the improvement in the current DAS28 score relative to baseline (Good response = DAS28 change >1.2 with current DAS28 =3.2; Moderate response = DAS28 change >0.6 with current DAS28 >3.2-5.1; Non-response = DAS28 change =0.6 and current DAS28 >5.1). Week 24
Secondary Percentage of Participants With ACR/EULAR Remission at Week 12 Boolean-based ACR/EULAR remission is achieved if all of the following requirements are met at the same timepoint: Tender Joint Count 68 (TJC68) = 1, Swollen Joint Count 66 (SJC66) = 1, high sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) = 1mg/dl and patient's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) = 10. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms. Week 12
Secondary Percentage of Participants With ACR/EULAR Remission at Week 24 for Treatment Arms That Started Study Intervention From Day 1 Boolean-based ACR/EULAR remission is achieved if all of the following requirements are met at the same timepoint: Tender Joint Count 68 (TJC68) = 1, Swollen Joint Count 66 (SJC66) = 1, high sensitivity C-reactive Protein (CRP) = 1mg/dl and patient's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) = 10. Week 24
Secondary Percentage of Participants With ACR/EULAR Remission at Week 24 for Placebo Switched Arms That Started Study Intervention From Week 12 Boolean-based ACR/EULAR remission is achieved if all of the following requirements are met at the same timepoint: Tender Joint Count 68 (TJC68) = 1, Swollen Joint Count 66 (SJC66) = 1, high sensitivity C-reactive Protein (CRP) = 1mg/dl and patient's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) = 10. Week 24
Secondary Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR at Week 12 DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR are measure of RA disease activity calculated using Swollen Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), high sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP in mg/L)/Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR in mm/hr (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) transformed to a 0-10 scale. Total score approximate range 0-9.4, with higher scores indicating more disease activity. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms. Baseline (Day 01) and Week 12
Secondary Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR at Week 24 for Treatment Arms That Started Study Intervention From Day 1 DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR are measure of RA disease activity calculated using Swollen Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), high sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP in mg/L)/Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR in mm/hr (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) transformed to a 0-10 scale. Total score approximate range 0-9.4, with higher scores indicating more disease activity. Baseline (Day 01) and Week 24
Secondary Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR at Week 24 for Placebo Switched Arms That Started Study Intervention From Week 12 DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR are measure of RA disease activity calculated using Swollen Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), high sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP in mg/L)/Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR in mm/hr (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) transformed to a 0-10 scale. Total score approximate range 0-9.4, with higher scores indicating more disease activity. Baseline (Day 01) and Week 24
Secondary Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 24 for Treatment Arms That Started Study Intervention From Day 1 Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) is a 20-question instrument that assesses the difficulty of a participant in eight domains of daily activities: Dressing & grooming, Arising, Eating, Walking, Hygiene, Reach, Grip, Common daily activities. HAQ-DI score was computed as sum of the domain scores divided by the number of domains answered. The total possible score ranges from 0=least difficulty to 3=extreme difficulty. Higher overall score indicates greater disability. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement. Baseline (Day 01) and Week 24
Secondary Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 24 for Placebo Switched Arms That Started Study Intervention From Week 12 Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) is a 20-question instrument that assesses the difficulty of a participant in eight domains of daily activities: Dressing & grooming, Arising, Eating, Walking, Hygiene, Reach, Grip, Common daily activities. HAQ-DI score was computed as sum of the domain scores divided by the number of domains answered. The total possible score ranges from 0=least difficulty to 3=extreme difficulty. Higher overall score indicates greater disability. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement. Baseline (Day 01) and Week 24
Secondary Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue at Week 12 The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-fatigue is a validated patient-reported measure of 13 statements regarding the feeling of fatigue. The total score ranges from 0 to 52 with higher values representing a lower fatigue and a better quality of life. A positive change from baseline in FACIT-fatigue indicates an improvement. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms. Baseline (Day 01) and Week 12
Secondary Change From Baseline in FACIT-Fatigue at Week 24 for Treatment Arms That Started Study Intervention From Day 1 The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-fatigue is a validated patient-reported measure of 13 statements regarding the feeling of fatigue. The total score ranges from 0 to 52 with higher values representing a lower fatigue and a better quality of life. A positive change from baseline in FACIT-fatigue indicates an improvement. Baseline (Day 01) and Week 24
Secondary Change From Baseline in FACIT-Fatigue at Week 24 for Placebo Switched Arms That Started Study Intervention From Week 12 The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-fatigue is a validated patient-reported measure of 13 statements regarding the feeling of fatigue. The total score ranges from 0 to 52 with higher values representing a lower fatigue and a better quality of life. A positive change from baseline in FACIT-fatigue indicates an improvement. Baseline (Day 01) and Week 24
Secondary Change From Baseline in Subject-completed Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Scores (PCS) at Week 12 The Short-Form 36 (SF-36) is a health-related survey that assesses quality of life covering 8 domains: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical and emotional problems, general health, mental health, social functioning, vitality. The score for a domain was an average of the individual question scores, which were scaled 0-100; higher score represents better health. The PCS is an aggregate score derived from 4 domains (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain and general health) representing overall physical health. T-score scale was used for PCS with mean of 50 and SD of 10; higher score represents better health. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement in overall physical heath. Quality Metrics software was used for scoring for SF-36. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms. Baseline (Day 01) and Week 12
Secondary Change From Baseline in SF-36 PCS at Week 24 for Treatment Arms That Started Study Intervention From Day 1 The Short-Form 36 (SF-36) is a health-related survey that assesses quality of life covering 8 domains: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical and emotional problems, general health, mental health, social functioning, vitality. The score for a domain was an average of the individual question scores, which were scaled 0-100; higher score represents better health. The PCS is an aggregate score derived from 4 domains (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain and general health) representing overall physical health. T-score scale was used for PCS with mean of 50 and SD of 10; higher score represents better health. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement in overall physical heath. Quality Metrics software was used for scoring for SF-36. Baseline (Day 01) and Week 24
Secondary Change From Baseline in SF-36 PCS at Week 24 for Placebo Switched Arms That Started Study Intervention From Week 12 The Short-Form 36 (SF-36) is a health-related survey that assesses quality of life covering 8 domains: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical and emotional problems, general health, mental health, social functioning, vitality. The score for a domain was an average of the individual question scores, which were scaled 0-100; higher score represents better health. The PCS is an aggregate score derived from 4 domains (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain and general health) representing overall physical health. T-score scale was used for PCS with mean of 50 and SD of 10; higher score represents better health. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement in overall physical heath. Quality Metrics software was used for scoring for SF-36. Baseline (Day 01) and Week 24
Secondary Change From Baseline in SF-36 Mental Component Scores (MCS) at Week 12 The Short-Form 36 (SF-36) is a health-related survey that assesses quality of life covering 8 domains: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical and emotional problems, general health, mental health, social functioning, vitality. The score for a domain was an average of the individual question scores, which were scaled 0-100; higher score represents better health. The MCS is an aggregated score derived from 4 domains (social functioning, vitality, mental health, and role-emotional domains) representing overall mental health. T-score scale was used for MCS with mean of 50 and SD of 10; higher score represents better health. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement in overall mental health. Quality Metrics software was used for scoring for SF-36. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms. Baseline (Day 01) and Week 12
Secondary Change From Baseline in SF-36 MCS at Week 24 for Treatment Arms That Started Study Intervention From Day 1 The Short-Form 36 (SF-36) is a health-related survey that assesses quality of life covering 8 domains: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical and emotional problems, general health, mental health, social functioning, vitality. The score for a domain was an average of the individual question scores, which were scaled 0-100; higher score represents better health. The MCS is an aggregated score derived from 4 domains (social functioning, vitality, mental health, and role-emotional domains) representing overall mental health. T-score scale was used for MCS with mean of 50 and SD of 10; higher score represents better health. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement in overall mental health. Quality Metrics software was used for scoring for SF-36. Baseline (Day 01) and Week 24
Secondary Change From Baseline in SF-36 MCS at Week 24 for Placebo Switched Arms That Started Study Intervention From Week 12 The Short-Form 36 (SF-36) is a health-related survey that assesses quality of life covering 8 domains: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical and emotional problems, general health, mental health, social functioning, vitality. The score for a domain was an average of the individual question scores, which were scaled 0-100; higher score represents better health. The MCS is an aggregated score derived from 4 domains (social functioning, vitality, mental health, and role-emotional domains) representing overall mental health. T-score scale was used for MCS with mean of 50 and SD of 10; higher score represents better health. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement in overall mental health. Quality Metrics software was used for scoring for SF-36. Baseline (Day 01) and Week 24
Secondary Change From Baseline in SF-36 Domain Scores at Week 12 The Short-Form 36 (SF-36) is a health-related survey that assesses quality of life covering 8 domains: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical and emotional problems, general health, mental health, social functioning, vitality. The MCS consists of 4 domains (social functioning, vitality, mental health, and role-emotional domains) and PCS consists of 4 domains (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain and general health). The individual question items are first summed for each item under the various sections. Then, those domain scores are scaled between 0 to 100, where higher score represents better health. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms. Baseline (Day 01) and Week 12
Secondary Change From Baseline in SF-36 Domain Scores at Week 24 for Treatment Arms That Started Study Intervention From Day 1 The Short-Form 36 (SF-36) is a health-related survey that assesses quality of life covering 8 domains: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical and emotional problems, general health, mental health, social functioning, vitality. The MCS consists of 4 domains (social functioning, vitality, mental health, and role-emotional domains) and PCS consists of 4 domains (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain and general health). The individual question items are first summed for each item under the various sections. Then, those domain scores are scaled between 0 to 100, where higher score represents better health. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement. Baseline (Day 01) and Week 24
Secondary Change From Baseline in SF-36 Domain Scores at Week 24 for Placebo Switched Arms That Started Study Intervention From Week 12 The Short-Form 36 (SF-36) is a health-related survey that assesses quality of life covering 8 domains: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical and emotional problems, general health, mental health, social functioning, vitality. The MCS consists of 4 domains (social functioning, vitality, mental health, and role-emotional domains) and PCS consists of 4 domains (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain and general health). The individual question items are first summed for each item under the various sections. Then, those domain scores are scaled between 0 to 100, where higher score represents better health. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement. Baseline (Day 01) and Week 24
Secondary Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Event (SAEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. A SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability/incapacity and/or can result in death. Up to Week 24
Secondary Change From Baseline in Neutrophil, Lymphocyte, Platelet Count (Giga Cells Per Liter) at Week 12 Blood samples was collected for the assessment of change from baseline in hematology parameters including neutrophil, lymphocyte, platelet count. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms. Baseline (Day 01) and Week 12
Secondary Change From Baseline in Neutrophil, Lymphocyte, Platelet Count (Giga Cells Per Liter) at Week 24 for Treatment Arms That Started Study Intervention From Day 1 Blood samples was collected for the assessment of change from baseline in hematology parameters including neutrophil, lymphocyte, platelet count. Baseline (Day 01) and Week 24
Secondary Change From Baseline in Neutrophil, Lymphocyte, Platelet Count (Giga Cells Per Liter) at Week 24 for Placebo Switched Arms That Started Study Intervention From Week 12 Blood samples was collected for the assessment of change from baseline in hematology parameters including neutrophil, lymphocyte, platelet count. Baseline (Week 12) and Week 24
Secondary Change From Baseline in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count (Giga Cells Per Liter) at Week 12 Blood samples was collected for the assessment of change from baseline in hematology parameter WBC count. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms. Baseline (Day 01) and Week 12
Secondary Change From Baseline in WBC Count (Giga Cells Per Liter) at Week 24 for Treatment Arms That Started Study Intervention From Day 1 Blood samples was collected for the assessment of change from baseline in hematology parameter WBC count. Baseline (Day 01) and Week 24
Secondary Change From Baseline in WBC Count (Giga Cells Per Liter) at Week 24 for Placebo Switched Arms That Started Study Intervention From Week 12 Blood samples was collected for the assessment of change from baseline in hematology parameter WBC count. Baseline (Week 12) and Week 24
Secondary Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Level (Grams Per Liter) Week 12 Blood samples was collected for the assessment of change from baseline in hematology parameter hemoglobin level. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms. Baseline (Day 01) and Week 12
Secondary Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Level (Grams Per Liter) Week 24 for Treatment Arms That Started Study Intervention From Day 1 Blood samples was collected for the assessment of change from baseline in in hematology parameter hemoglobin level. Baseline (Day 01) and Week 24
Secondary Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Level (Grams Per Liter) Week 24 for Placebo Switched Arms That Started Study Intervention From Week 12 Blood samples was collected for the assessment of change from baseline in in hematology parameter hemoglobin level. Baseline (Week 12) and Week 24
Secondary Change From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Alkaline Phosphatase (AP) Gamma-glutamyl Transferase(GGT) Levels (International Units Per Liter) at Week 12 Blood samples was collected for the assessment of change from baseline in laboratory parameters including aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (AP) gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) levels. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms. Baseline (Day 01) and Week 12
Secondary Change From Baseline in AST, ALT, AP, GGT Levels (International Units Per Liter) at Week 24 for Treatment Arms That Started Study Intervention From Day 1 Blood samples was collected for the assessment of change from baseline in laboratory parameters including AST, ALT, AP, GGT levels. Baseline (Day 01) and Week 24
Secondary Change From Baseline in AST, ALT, AP, GGT Levels (International Units Per Liter) at Week 24 for Placebo Switched Arms That Started Study Intervention From Week 12 Blood samples was collected for the assessment of change from baseline in laboratory parameters including AST, ALT, AP, GGT levels. Baseline (Week 12) and Week 24
Secondary Change From Baseline in Albumin Level (Grams Per Liter) at Week 12 Blood samples was collected for the assessment of change from baseline in laboratory parameter albumin level. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms. Baseline (Day 01) and Week 12
Secondary Change From Baseline in Albumin Level (Grams Per Liter) at Week 24 for Treatment Arms That Started Study Intervention From Day 1 Blood samples was collected for the assessment of change from baseline in laboratory parameter albumin level. Baseline (Day 01) and Week 24
Secondary Change From Baseline in Albumin Level (Grams Per Liter) at Week 24 for Placebo Switched Arms That Started Study Intervention From Week 12 Blood samples was collected for the assessment of change from baseline in laboratory parameter albumin level. Baseline (Week 12) and Week 24
Secondary Change From Baseline in Total Bilirubin (Micromoles Per Liter) at Week 12 Blood samples was collected for the assessment of change from baseline in laboratory parameter total bilirubin level. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms. Baseline (Day 01) and Week 12
Secondary Change From Baseline in Total Bilirubin (Micromoles Per Liter) at Week 24 for Treatment Arms That Started Study Intervention From Day 1 Blood samples was collected for the assessment of change from baseline in laboratory parameter bilirubin level. Baseline (Day 01) and Week 24
Secondary Change From Baseline in Total Bilirubin (Micromoles Per Liter) at Week 24 for Placebo Switched Arms That Started Study Intervention From Week 12 Blood samples was collected for the assessment of change from baseline in laboratory parameter bilirubin level. Baseline (Week 12) and Week 24
Secondary Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Millimoles Per Liter) at Week 12 Blood samples was collected for the assessment of change from baseline in lipid profile of total cholesterol levels. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms. Baseline (Day 01) and Week 12
Secondary Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Millimoles Per Liter) at Week 24 for Treatment Arms That Started Study Intervention From Day 1 Blood samples was collected for the assessment of change from baseline in lipid profile of total cholesterol levels. Baseline (Day 01) and Week 24
Secondary Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Millimoles Per Liter) at Week 24 for Placebo Switched Arms That Started Study Intervention From Week 12 Blood samples was collected for the assessment of change from baseline in lipid profile of total cholesterol levels. Baseline (Week 12) and Week 24
Secondary Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipid Profile: Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol, High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol (Millimoles Per Liter) at Week 12 Blood samples was collected for the assessment of change from baseline in fasting lipid profile including LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol levels. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms. Baseline (Day 01) and Week 12
Secondary Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipid Profile: LDL Cholesterol, HDL Cholesterol (Millimoles Per Liter) at Week 24 for Treatment Arms That Started Study Intervention From Day 1 Blood samples was collected for the assessment of change from baseline in fasting lipid profile including LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol levels. Baseline (Day 01) and Week 24
Secondary Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipid Profile: LDL Cholesterol, HDL Cholesterol (Millimoles Per Liter) at Week 24 for Placebo Switched Arms That Started Study Intervention From Week 12 Blood samples was collected for the assessment of change from baseline in fasting lipid profile including LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol levels. Baseline (Week 12) and Week 24
Secondary Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipid Profile Triglycerides (Millimoles Per Liter) at Week 12 Blood samples was collected for the assessment of change from baseline in fasting lipid profile triglycerides levels. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms. Baseline (Day 01) and Week 12
Secondary Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipid Profile Triglycerides (Millimoles Per Liter) at Week 24 for Treatment Arms That Started Study Intervention From Day 1 Blood samples was collected for the assessment of change from baseline in fasting lipid profile triglycerides levels. Baseline (Day 01) and Week 24
Secondary Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipid Profile Triglycerides (Millimoles Per Liter) at Week 24 for Placebo Switched Arms That Started Study Intervention From Week 12 Blood samples was collected for the assessment of change from baseline in fasting lipid profile triglycerides levels. Baseline (Week 12) and Week 24
Secondary Number of Participants With National Cancer Institute (NCI)-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) >=Grade 3 Hematological/Clinical Chemistry Abnormalities for Treatment Arms That Started Study Intervention From Day 1 Number of participants who reported NCI-CTCAE Grade 3 or higher for hematological and clinical chemistry abnormalities were summarized. Up to Week 24
Secondary Concentrations of Granulocyte-macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) Autoantibody Blood samples were collected for markers which may influence rheumatoid arthritis. Concentrations of GM-CSF autoantibodies was determined. At baseline
Secondary Number of Participants With Anti-GSK3196165 Antibodies Blood samples were collected for anti-GSK3196165 antibodies detection assay using tiered testing schema: screening, confirmation and titration steps was used for immunogenicity analysis. Up to Week 24
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Terminated NCT01682512 - Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, and Safety of BI 695500 in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Phase 3
Completed NCT00539760 - A Phase I Rheumatoid Arthritis Study in Healthy Volunteers Phase 1
Active, not recruiting NCT03312465 - Anatomical Shoulder Domelock System Study
Completed NCT01208181 - A Two-Part, 12-Week Study of Etoricoxib as a Treatment for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) (MK-0663-107) Phase 3
Completed NCT03254810 - Comparison of the Safety and PK of SYN060 to Humira® in Healthy Adult Subjects Phase 1
Completed NCT01711814 - A Study to Evaluate the Long-term Safety and Efficacy of ASP015K in Subjects Previously Enrolled in a Phase 2 ASP015K Rheumatoid Arthritis Study Phase 2
Completed NCT03315494 - Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Multiple Ascending Doses of SKI-O-703 in Healthy Volunteers Phase 1
Withdrawn NCT03241446 - Pharmacokinetics and Dosimetry of Tc 99m Tilmanocept Following a Single Intravenous Dose Administration in Male and Female Subjects Diagnosed With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Phase 1
Completed NCT02553018 - Comparison of Compliance and Evolution of Functional Capacity of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated by Methotrexate Either by Auto-injector or by Conventional Sub-cutaneous Syringe Phase 3
Completed NCT02748785 - MTX Discontinuation and Vaccine Response Phase 4
Active, not recruiting NCT02260778 - Treat-to-target in RA: Collaboration To Improve adOption and adhereNce N/A
Completed NCT02569736 - Characterization of the Effect of Tocilizumab in Vivo and in Vitro on T Follicular Helper Cells in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients and Consequence on B Cells Maturation
Completed NCT01750931 - This Study is Randomised, Single Oral Dose Bioequivalence Study of Meloxicam GSK 15 MG Tablets. Phase 2
Withdrawn NCT01204138 - Concomitant Use of Apremilast for the Treatment of Active RA Despite TNF-Inhibition and Methotrexate- CATARA Phase 2
Not yet recruiting NCT01154647 - Pain Inhibition in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis and Central Sensitivity Syndromes N/A
Completed NCT00975130 - Subcutaneous Golimumab (GLM) Plus DMARDs for Rheumatoid Arthritis, Followed by Intravenous/Subcutaneous GLM Strategy (P06129 AM2) Phase 3
Completed NCT00913458 - Study Evaluating Etanercept Plus Methotrexate in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Phase 4
Completed NCT00973479 - An Effectiveness and Safety Study of Intravenous Golimumab in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Despite Treatment With Methotrexate Therapy Phase 3
Completed NCT00550446 - A Phase 2 Study For Patients With A Physician's Diagnosis Of Rheumatoid Arthritis Phase 2
Completed NCT00660647 - Optimized Treatment Algorithm for Patients With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Phase 3

External Links