Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT00687193
Other study ID # A3921040
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 2
First received May 22, 2008
Last updated March 19, 2013
Start date March 2009
Est. completion date July 2010

Study information

Verified date March 2013
Source Pfizer
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority Japan: Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

To evaluate the dose-response relationship of 5 dose of CP-690,550, compared to placebo for the treatment of signs and symptoms in patients with active RA who failed an adequate trial of therapy with at least 1 DMARD in a 12-week therapy.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 318
Est. completion date July 2010
Est. primary completion date July 2010
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 20 Years to 70 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Subjects must have failed an adequate trial of therapy with at least 1 DMARD due to lack of efficacy or toxicity.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Current therapy with any DMARD

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Placebo
Placebo BID, 3 blinded tablets administered BID for 12 weeks
CP-690,550
10mg BID, 3 blinded tablets administered BID for 12 weeks
CP-690,550
15mg BID, 3 blinded tablets administered BID for 12 weeks
CP-690,550
1mg BID, 3 blinded tablets administered BID for 12 weeks
CP-690,550
3mg BID, 3 blinded tablets administered BID for 12 weeks
CP-690,550
5mg BID, 3 blinded tablets administered BID for 12 weeks

Locations

Country Name City State
Japan Pfizer Investigational Site Arakawa-ku Tokyo
Japan Pfizer Investigational Site Asahikawa Hokkaido
Japan Pfizer Investigational Site Bunkyo-ku Tokyo
Japan Pfizer Investigational Site Chiba
Japan Pfizer Investigational Site Fukuoka
Japan Pfizer Investigational Site Fukusima
Japan Pfizer Investigational Site Higashihiroshima Hiroshima
Japan Pfizer Investigational Site Hiroshima
Japan Pfizer Investigational Site Hiroshima-city Hiroshima
Japan Pfizer Investigational Site Iiduka Fukuoka
Japan Pfizer Investigational Site Kashihara Nara
Japan Pfizer Investigational Site Kawachinagano Osaka
Japan Pfizer Investigational Site Kawagoe-shi Saitama
Japan Pfizer Investigational Site Kitakyusyu Fukuoka
Japan Pfizer Investigational Site Kitamoto Saitama
Japan Pfizer Investigational Site Koushi Kumamoto
Japan Pfizer Investigational Site Kumamoto
Japan Pfizer Investigational Site Kurume Fukuoka
Japan Pfizer Investigational Site Kyoto
Japan Pfizer Investigational Site Musashimurayama-shi Tokyo
Japan Pfizer Investigational Site Nagasaki
Japan Pfizer Investigational Site Nagoya Aichi
Japan Pfizer Investigational Site Narashino Chiba
Japan Pfizer Investigational Site Nishinomiya Hyogo
Japan Pfizer Investigational Site Ohmura Nagasaki
Japan Pfizer Investigational Site Oita
Japan Pfizer Investigational Site Osaka
Japan Pfizer Investigational Site Sagamihara Kanagawa
Japan Pfizer Investigational Site Saitama
Japan Pfizer Investigational Site Sapporo Hokkaido
Japan Pfizer Investigational Site Sasebo Nagasaki
Japan Pfizer Investigational Site Sawara-ku Fukuoka
Japan Pfizer Investigational Site Sendai Miyagi
Japan Pfizer Investigational Site Setagaya-ku Tokyo
Japan Pfizer Investigational Site Shinjyuku-ku Tokyo
Japan Pfizer Investigational Site Takaoka Toyama
Japan Pfizer Investigational Site Takasaki Gunma
Japan Pfizer Investigational Site Tsu Mie
Japan Pfizer Investigational Site Tsukuba Ibaraki
Japan Pfizer Investigational Site Ureshino-shi Saga
Japan Pfizer Investigational Site Yotukaidou Chiba

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Pfizer

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Japan, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Number of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 ACR20 response: greater than or equal to (>=) 20 percent (%) improvement in painful and tender joint count; >= 20% improvement in swollen joint count; and >= 20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP). Week 12 No
Secondary Number of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Weeks 2, 4 and 8 ACR20 response: greater than or equal to (>=) 20 percent (%) improvement in painful and tender joint count; >= 20% improvement in swollen joint count; and >= 20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP)at each visit. Week 2, 4, and 8 No
Secondary Number of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response ACR50 response: greater than or equal to (>=) 50 percent (%) improvement in painful and tender joint count; >= 50% improvement in swollen joint count; and >= 50% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at each visit. Week 2, 4, 8 and 12 No
Secondary Number of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response ACR70 response: greater than or equal to (>=) 70 percent (%) improvement in painful and tender joint count; >= 70% improvement in swollen joint count; and >= 70% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at each visit. Week 2, 4, 8 and 12 No
Secondary Number of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 90% (ACR90) Response ACR90 response: greater than or equal to (>=) 90 percent (%) improvement in painful and tender joint count; >= 90% improvement in swollen joint count; and >= 90% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at each visit. Week 2, 4, 8 and 12 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count Using C-reactive Protein [DAS28-3(CRP)] The DAS28-3 (CRP) score is a measure of the perticipant's disease activity. It is based on the painful and tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints) and CRP. DAS28-3 (CRP) scores range from 0 - 10; higher scores indicated greater affectation due to disease activity.
Change = value at observation minus value at baseline
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count Using Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate [DAS28-4(ESR)] The DAS28-4 (ESR) score is a measure of the participant's disease activity. It is based on the painful and tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), participant's global assessment of disease activity (mm), and ESR. DAS28-4(ESR) scores range from 0 - 10; higher scores indicated greater affectation due to disease activity.
Change = score at observation minus score at baseline.
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty.
Change = score at observation minus score at baseline.
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Painful and Tender Joint Counts Number of tender joints was determined by examining 68 joints and identified the joints that were painful under pressure or to passive motion. The number of tender joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no tenderness = 0, tenderness = 1. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. Change = value at observation minus value at baseline. Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Number of swollen joints was determined by examination of 66 joints and identifying when swelling was present. The number of swollen joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no swelling = 0, swelling =1. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. Change = value at observation minus value at baseline. Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain Change from Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain -VAS (0 to 100 mm visual analog scale, 0 being no pain and 100 being most severe pain) was computed as Week 2, 4, 8 or 12 values minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Change = value at observation minus value at baseline.
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?" Participants responded by using a 0 - 100 mm Visual Analog Scale where 0 = very well and 100 = very poorly. Change = score at observation minus score at baseline. Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity was measured on a 0 to 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), with 0 mm = no disease activity; very good and 100 mm = worst disease activity; very poor. Change = score at observation minus score at baseline. Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in C- Reactive Protein (CRP) (mg/L) The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement. Change = value at observation minus value at baseline. Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12 No
Secondary Area Under Curve (AUC) for Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology-N (ACR-N) ACR-N = calculated for each participant by taking lowest percentage improvement in (1) swollen joint count or (2) tender joint count or (3) the median of remaining 5 components of ACR response (participant's assessment of disease activity; participant's global assessment of pain; physician's assessment of disease activity; participant's assessment of physical function; an acute phase reactant value - CRP). Negative numbers indicate worsening. The AUC for ACR-N is measure of the area under the curve of the mean change from baseline in ACR-N. The trapezoidal rule was used to compute AUC. Baseline, Week 12 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life (EQ-5D) EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state ("confined to bed"). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state. Change = score at Week 12 minus score at baseline. Baseline, Week 12 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) -Physical Functioning Domain SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning).
Change = score at Week 12 minus score at baseline.
Baseline, Week 12 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) -Role-Physical Domain SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning).
Change = score at Week 12 minus score at baseline.
Baseline, Week 12 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) -Bodily Pain Domain SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning).
Change = score at Week 12 minus score at baseline.
Baseline, Week 12 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) -General Health Domain SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning).
Change = score at Week 12 minus score at baseline.
Baseline, Week 12 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) -Vitality Domain SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning).
Change =score at Week 12 minus score at baseline
Baseline, Week 12 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) -Social Functioning Domain SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning).
Change = score at Week 12 minus score at baseline.
Baseline, Week 12 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) -Role-Emotional Domain SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning).
Change = score at Week 12 minus score at baseline.
Baseline, Week 12 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) -Mental Health Domain SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning).
Change = score at Week 12 minus score at baseline.
Baseline, Week 12 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) - Physical Component Summary (PCS) SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning).
Change = score at Week 12 minus score at baseline.
Baseline, Week 12 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) - Mental Component Summary (MCS) SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning).
Change = score at Week 12 minus score at baseline.
Baseline, Week 12 No
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Terminated NCT01682512 - Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, and Safety of BI 695500 in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Phase 3
Completed NCT00539760 - A Phase I Rheumatoid Arthritis Study in Healthy Volunteers Phase 1
Active, not recruiting NCT03312465 - Anatomical Shoulder Domelock System Study
Completed NCT01208181 - A Two-Part, 12-Week Study of Etoricoxib as a Treatment for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) (MK-0663-107) Phase 3
Completed NCT03254810 - Comparison of the Safety and PK of SYN060 to Humira® in Healthy Adult Subjects Phase 1
Completed NCT01711814 - A Study to Evaluate the Long-term Safety and Efficacy of ASP015K in Subjects Previously Enrolled in a Phase 2 ASP015K Rheumatoid Arthritis Study Phase 2
Completed NCT03315494 - Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Multiple Ascending Doses of SKI-O-703 in Healthy Volunteers Phase 1
Withdrawn NCT03241446 - Pharmacokinetics and Dosimetry of Tc 99m Tilmanocept Following a Single Intravenous Dose Administration in Male and Female Subjects Diagnosed With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Phase 1
Completed NCT02553018 - Comparison of Compliance and Evolution of Functional Capacity of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated by Methotrexate Either by Auto-injector or by Conventional Sub-cutaneous Syringe Phase 3
Completed NCT02748785 - MTX Discontinuation and Vaccine Response Phase 4
Active, not recruiting NCT02260778 - Treat-to-target in RA: Collaboration To Improve adOption and adhereNce N/A
Completed NCT02569736 - Characterization of the Effect of Tocilizumab in Vivo and in Vitro on T Follicular Helper Cells in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients and Consequence on B Cells Maturation
Completed NCT01750931 - This Study is Randomised, Single Oral Dose Bioequivalence Study of Meloxicam GSK 15 MG Tablets. Phase 2
Withdrawn NCT01204138 - Concomitant Use of Apremilast for the Treatment of Active RA Despite TNF-Inhibition and Methotrexate- CATARA Phase 2
Not yet recruiting NCT01154647 - Pain Inhibition in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis and Central Sensitivity Syndromes N/A
Completed NCT00913458 - Study Evaluating Etanercept Plus Methotrexate in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Phase 4
Completed NCT00973479 - An Effectiveness and Safety Study of Intravenous Golimumab in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Despite Treatment With Methotrexate Therapy Phase 3
Completed NCT00975130 - Subcutaneous Golimumab (GLM) Plus DMARDs for Rheumatoid Arthritis, Followed by Intravenous/Subcutaneous GLM Strategy (P06129 AM2) Phase 3
Completed NCT00550446 - A Phase 2 Study For Patients With A Physician's Diagnosis Of Rheumatoid Arthritis Phase 2
Completed NCT00660647 - Optimized Treatment Algorithm for Patients With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Phase 3