View clinical trials related to Arthritis, Rheumatoid.
Filter by:To assess the role of ultrasonography and SE in detecting the median nerve changes before progression to CTS in patients with RA.
This study aims at investigating the possible efficacy and safety of carvedilol as an adjunctive therapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and hypertension.
This study investigates the effectiveness of SIMPLI.REHAB, a digital tool employed as an interface for administering occupational rehabilitation programs to patients diagnosed with Rheumatoid and Psoriatic Arthritis. Both of these conditions are inflammatory joint disorders capable of causing significant morphofunctional alterations in the hands, especially in their advanced stages. The introduction of digital technology emerges as a complementary tool when implementing rehabilitation programs. Utilizing a prospective, longitudinal, single-blinded experimental study, 35 patients will be allocated into two groups: one receiving a complementary digital intervention through SIMPLI.REHAB and the other through a conventional rehabilitation program. Each group consists of six patients and the program spans seven weeks, focusing on therapeutic exercises, training in manual dexterity, and motor coordination, among other interventions, led by a Physiatrist. The study intends to measure outcomes based on functionality scores, pain, disease activity, joint range, grip, pinch strength, and manual dexterity, both before and after each intervention, in order to ascertain the efficacy of integrating dynamic content through the digital tool SIMPLI.REHAB, as a supplementary resource in occupational rehabilitation programs. The potential limitations of the study include potential losses of follow-up and difficulties in assessing adherence to the digital tool precisely. Nonetheless, the digital tool aims to augment functional gains in rehabilitation programs by providing patients with accessible dynamic content of home-based strategies.
Chronic inflammatory rheumatism (CIR) is a group of inflammatory diseases that affect the joints and spine and are related to an abnormal immune response. CIR includes many different forms of arthritis that manifest as painful and swollen joints, stiffness, especially in the morning and persisting even after exercise, and limited joint mobility. CIR can also affect bones, cartilage, ligaments, tendons and muscles. Some may affect other organs. These symptoms can lead to a reduced quality of life, limited physical activity and progressive structural and functional deterioration of the joints. Current treatment for CIR is aimed at reducing inflammation and relieving pain. Anti-inflammatory medications such as corticosteroids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can be used to relieve pain and inflammation. Biotherapies can also be used to modify the progression of the disease. On the other hand, regular exercise can help strengthen the muscles that support the affected joints and improve mobility. Physical therapies, such as physical and occupational therapy, can also help improve mobility and relieve pain. Although there is no definitive cure for CIR early and appropriate treatment can help reduce symptoms and improve quality of life, as well as avoid the risk of developing complications such as lung, cardiovascular, kidney, ophthalmic, liver and other diseases. It is in this context, in order to better understand CIR to improve the global management of patients, and to analyze the evolution of CIR over time in relation to the different treatments proposed, that the interest in creating a database of patients with CIR arises.
The goal of this N-of-1 study is to learn about treatment for individual patients who have rheumatoid arthritis (RA,) for which many treatments are available. The treatments are different in how they work, the way they are given, side- effects, and cost. While treatment guidelines are available, finding the best treatment order of treatments is often based on physician choice. The main question this study aims to answer are: - What are the effects of different treatments on RA symptoms and condition for each individual patient - What is the effectiveness of different treatments across all patients enrolled in the N-of-1 study Participants will be enrolled and randomized to a sequence of three U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved RA medications: 1. adalimumab, 2. sarilumab, and 3. upadacitinib. Participants will be asked to complete questionnaires about their condition and quality of life weekly (either in clinic or remotely) and report their level of pain daily (remotely).
The goal of this open label multicenter randomized controlled pragmatic superiority trial is to investigate the optimal treatment/tapering strategy with rituximab for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The main questions it aims to answer are: - What is the optimal treatment/tapering strategy for rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in terms of reducing patient reported disease impact? - What is the optimal treatment/tapering strategy for rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in terms of therapeutic efficacy? Participants will be randomized to one of two study arms: - Tapering based on disease-activity guided dose reduction (experimental arm) - Tapering based on interval prolongation (active comparator arm)
The goal of this observational study is to investigate whether 99mTc-maraciclatide imaging prior to biologic therapy tapering and after 3 months can predict those at risk of Rheumatoid arthritis flare. Participants undergoing routine tapering of biologic drug therapy will have 99mTc-maraciclatide imaging in addition to normal ultrasound imaging and then followed up over 12 months to assess whether an interval scan alone or in combination with the baseline scan is predictive of flare.
Rationale: Around 20% of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients have persistent pain, despite having well-controlled disease activity. There is a significant overlap in underlying mechanisms between post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and persistent pain. Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) is a proven effective treatment for PTSD and evidence is growing that it may also be effective for persistent pain. Objective: To assess the feasibility and estimate the effectiveness of EMDR in RA patients with persistent pain despite inflammation being under control. Study design: A multiple-baseline single-case experimental design (SCED) across three time series. Participants will be randomized to one of the three time series. Within the time series the start of the intervention is randomly determined. Four participants will be assigned to the shortest, three to the medium and three to the longest baseline length. The SCED study consists of a baseline phase (A1), intervention phase (B), post-treatment phase (A2), follow-up phase 1 (A3), and follow-up phase 2 (A4). Study population: Subjects are RA patients > 18 years with low disease activity (DAS28<3.2) at >2 measurements over the previous 12 months and concurrent elevated pain scores (NRS-pain>6). Intervention (if applicable): EMDR therapy consists of an intake and eight sessions of 90 minutes in total, performed according to the EMDR standard protocol, conducted by four psychologists, all are level-II trained, under the supervision of an EMDR Europe consultant. EMDR focuses on processing traumatic memories, pain-related memories, and current physical pain. Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary endpoint for effectiveness is the pre-treatment phase A1 to post-treatment phase A2 difference in NRS pain intensity. Feasibility is examined by monitoring recruitment, dropout rates, and treatment satisfaction. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: If the therapy is effective, pain intensity decreases, additional physical complaints of RA decrease and participants experience less discomfort from their pain in daily life. EMDR therapy is an evidence-based treatment for PTSD and the reduction of posttraumatic stress favors the recovery of physical complaints. Participating in the study includes two conversations for inclusion (two times 60 minutes consisting of one telephone conversation and one face-to-face conversation), attending the EMDR therapy intake (one time 90 minutes) and sessions (eight times 90 minutes), and daily registration of complaints (about two minutes per day) via a smartphone application, completing the questionnaires (about 14-28 minutes at six specific time points during the study), and an exit conversation at six months follow up. Daily registration will take 18 to 20 weeks maximum. At the three- and six-month follow-up, participants will be asked to register daily for 14 days. EMDR sessions can be emotionally intense, but never are as challenging as living with unprocessed (traumatic) pain-related memories. There are no risks associated with EMDR therapy.
To determine cardiac and pulmonary involvement in RA patients To assess the correlation between cardiopulmonary findings in RA patients with disease activity. To compare between diaphragmatic ultrasonography and PFT i.e. spirometry as a screening tool for restrictive pulmonary disorders. To assess correlation between anterior chest wall ultrasound and pulmonary function test in RA patients.
This is a descriptive, ambispective, and single-site study in Colombia, which is designed to evaluate the adherence, persistence, and clinical outcomes (defined as the patient's disease activity and functional status) of RA patients within 40 weeks after the patient administered the first injection of the etanercept medication through the Smartclic® device. The study data seeks from medical records containing the Smartclic device injection log and pharmacy claims database available from an institution specialized in rheumatological care. The study will only include records of patients treated or starting treatment with etanercept and whose indicated autoinjection device has been Smartclic.