View clinical trials related to Arthritis, Psoriatic.
Filter by:The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ixekizumab versus adalimumab in participants with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who are biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD) naive.
Methotrexate (MTX) co-medication can improve the therapeutic effect of biological therapies (e.g. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) -inhibitors) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but its role in Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) remains unclear. No data from Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs) are available to address the questions whether add-on of MTX to UST monotherapy, or a withdrawal of continuous MTX therapy in patients with newly initiated Ustekinumab (UST) treatment or simultaneously induction of MTX with UST in naive active PsA-patients will influence outcome measurements. So, the purpose of the study is to analyse the effects of blinded MTX-co-medication on outcome in patients treated with UST: Non-inferiority at week 24 of UST monotherapy compared to add-on to MTX in patients with active PsA and at least 12 weeks of MTX treatment prior to screening or who are actually not treated with MTX and do not have prior inadequate response to MTX-treatment for PsA will be demonstrated.
Psoriasis (Ps) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are associated with increased risk of metabolic syndrome (MetS), body fatness and cardiovascular risk. Additionally, oxidative stress and inflammation are also contributing mechanisms on Ps and PsA. However, little is known about the influence of diet and micronutrients on the main outcomes of these diseases. The aim of the investigators is to evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention diet program on disease activity, metabolic profile and oxidative stress inpatients with Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis.
The purpose of this study is to define cut-off values of the most widely used composite scores and patient-reported outcomes, for levels corresponding to remission/low disease activity and for changes in levels corresponding to flares, in PsA, when remission/low disease activity and flare are defined from the patient and physician perspective. The ReFlaP (Remission/Flare in PsA) study is a prospective, multicentric international, longitudinal, observational study.
A total of approximately 500 patients with active psoriatic arthritis in an estimated 80 to 100 trial centers are to be enrolled. Selection of centers will be made by the sponsor's medical section. To increase the quality of the data and to reduce distribution of the data collected, centers to be included will be those which can enroll at least 5 patients. Care will be taken to ensure a balanced regional distribution. The proposed observation period for the trial is approx. 52 weeks per patient. Estimated patient enrolment is also 52 weeks. The duration of the follow-up period will be extended from approx. 52 weeks to approx. 100 weeks to gain further information about the long-term use of Otezla®. For this extension of the follow-up period 2 new visits (visits 6 and 7) are proposed.Thus, proposed duration from first patient in (FPI) to last patient out (LPO) is 36 months-
This study includes two periods. The main objective of Period 1 is to compare the efficacy of upadacitinib 15 mg once daily (QD) and 30 mg QD versus placebo and versus adalimumab (Humira®) in participants with moderately to severely active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who have had an inadequate response to non-biologic DMARDs (DMARD-IR). Period 1 is also designed to compare the efficacy of upadacitinib 15 mg and 30 mg QD versus placebo for the prevention of structural progression. The objective of Period 2 is to evaluate the long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of upadacitinib 15 mg and 30 mg QD in participants who have completed Period 1.
The study objectives of Period 1 are to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of upadacitinib 15 mg once daily (QD) and 30 mg QD versus placebo for the treatment of signs and symptoms in adults with moderately to severely active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who have had an inadequate response or intolerance to biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD). The objective of Period 2 is to evaluate the long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of upadacitinib 15 mg QD and 30 mg QD in participants who have completed Period 1.
This is a multicenter, Phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in subjects with moderately to severely active Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) who have an inadequate response or are intolerant to conventional disease-modifying therapy. A total of approximately 124 subjects will be randomized to one of 2 treatment arms in a 1:1 ratio: oral filgotinib tablets q.d. or matching placebo tablets q.d. The Screening visit will occur within 28 days before study drug administration. At Day 1 (Baseline), eligible subjects will be randomized to treatment for a duration of 16 weeks. The study is concluded with a Follow-up period lasting until 4 weeks after the last dose. Consequently, each subject will stay in the study for a maximum of 24 weeks (from Screening visit to Follow-up visit).
The study will include a representative sample of 150 patients with active Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) for whom the treating rheumatologist has decided to begin treatment with apremilast. This study is non-interventional, drug dosing and treatment duration will be at the sole discretion of the treating rheumatologist, in accordance with the local label and daily clinical practice. APOLO is a national (Belgium), multicentre, prospective, non-interventional, post-marketing study.
Infliximab and other TNF-inhibitors have revolutionised the treatment of several immunological inflammatory diseases. Still, more than half of the patients either do not respond sufficiently to infliximab therapy or loose efficacy over time. The large individual variation in the serum drug concentrations on standard doses and the development of anti-drug antibodies are thought to be main reasons for these treatment failures. An individualised treatment strategy based on systematic assessments of serum drug concentrations, therapeutic drug monitoring, has been proposed as a clinical tool to optimise efficacy of infliximab treatment. Therapeutic drug monitoring seems reasonable both from a clinical and an economical point of view, but the effectiveness of this treatment strategy still remain to be shown. The NOR-DRUM study is planned as a national, randomised controlled multicentre trial in two parts aiming to assess the effectiveness of therapeutic drug monitoring in order to achieve remission in patients with immunological inflammatory diseases starting infliximab treatment (part A) and in order to maintain disease control in patients on maintenance infliximab treatment (part B). The results of the NOR-DRUM study will hopefully contribute to an implementation of a personalised medicine approach to treatment with infliximab and other biological drugs.