Arrhythmias Ventricular Clinical Trial
— AMIOLIDO-VTOfficial title:
PROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN AMIODARONE Versus LIDOCAINE IN PATIENTS WITH STABLE VENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA IN THE EMERGENCY ROOM
Introduction: Recent studies have suggested that other medications may be superior to
amiodarone in controlling ventricular arrhythmias. However, a prospective and randomized
comparison with lidocaine has not yet been described.
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the use of amiodarone
versus lidocaine in patients with stable ventricular tachycardias.
Methodology: For this, a unicentric, randomized and prospective study will be carried out, in
which the two drugs will be administered in a comparative manner. Hospital data (test
results, medical outcomes, arrhythmia reversal, complications) of patients will be analyzed
for safety and effectiveness.
Expected results: The use of lidocaine is not inferior to amiodarone in the tolerability and
reversion of stable ventricular tachycardias.
| Status | Recruiting |
| Enrollment | 80 |
| Est. completion date | August 2, 2022 |
| Est. primary completion date | August 2, 2019 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | 18 Years and older |
| Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Adult men and women> 18 years old - Presence of sustained ventricular tachycardia with HR> 120 bpm - Systolic blood pressure> 90 mmHg - No signs of poor peripheral perfusion - Absence of dyspnea - Absence of severe angina - Signed consent form Exclusion Criteria: - Pregnancy - Hemodynamic instability - Body mass index greater than 40 kg / m2 - Use of intravenous amiodarone or lidocaine in the last 24 hours - Acute coronary syndrome - Presence of tachycardia with irregular or supraventricular RR - Contraindications to study drugs |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brazil | Instituto do Coração - HMFMUSP | São Paulo | SP |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| University of Sao Paulo General Hospital |
Brazil,
Link MS, Berkow LC, Kudenchuk PJ, Halperin HR, Hess EP, Moitra VK, Neumar RW, O'Neil BJ, Paxton JH, Silvers SM, White RD, Yannopoulos D, Donnino MW. Part 7: Adult Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for — View Citation
Somberg JC, Bailin SJ, Haffajee CI, Paladino WP, Kerin NZ, Bridges D, Timar S, Molnar J; Amio-Aqueous Investigators. Intravenous lidocaine versus intravenous amiodarone (in a new aqueous formulation) for incessant ventricular tachycardia. Am J Cardiol. 20 — View Citation
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Signs of peripheral hypoperfusion and shock | hypoperfusion and shock | 1 hour | |
| Primary | Signs of pulmonary congestion | dyspnea, orthopnea, onset of pulmonary rales or drop in oximetry. | 1 hour | |
| Primary | Severe hypotension | systolic blood pressure <70 mmHg if the previous one is <100 mmHg or systolic blood pressure <80 mmHg if the previous one is > 100 mmHg). | 1 hour | |
| Primary | HR increase | HR increase> 20 bpm. | 1 hour | |
| Primary | The appearance of polymorphic TV. | polymorphic TV. | 1 hour | |
| Primary | Lowering the level of consciousness. | glasgow < 15 | 1 hour | |
| Secondary | effectiveness of reversal | sinusal rhythm | 1 hour | |
| Secondary | time required for reversal | sinusal rhythm | 1 hour |