Practical Advantages of Single-port Over Three-port Laparoscopic

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

Despite growing popularity, practical advantages of single-port laparoscopic appendectomy (SLA) over conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) have yet to be established well in pediatric population.

The investigators designed the randomized controlled trial to clarify practical advantages of SLA over CLA in pediatric population. The investigators compared conversion rate, intra-operative adverse events, operating time, wound complications, intra-abdominal complications, and postoperative hospital stay, changes in postoperative pain severity, and cosmetic outcomes during follow up period between SLA and CLA groups.

Clinical Trial Description

Currently the single-port laparoscopic appendectomy (SLA) has gained popularity in pediatric population since it was first reported in 1998 by Esposito et al. Nonetheless, the practical advantages of SLA over conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) have yet to be established well in pediatric population due to lacking and inconsistent high-level evidences from randomized trials and meta-analysis.

Thus far, in addition to overall postoperative hospital stay, complications such as wound abscess and seroma, intra-abdominal abscess and ileus were reported not to be significantly different between SLA and CLA, while SLA might have taken longer operation time in children and adult. Currently, the advertised benefits on postoperative pain and cosmetic results of SLA incurred suspicion because of heterogeneous data inconsistently supporting SLA from a few RCTs especially in pediatric population. Consequently, a consensus regarding the practical superiority of SLA to CLA has still not been reached particularly in children.

To address this issue, the investigators designed the randomized trial to clarify practical benefits of SLA over CLA in pediatric population. For this, the investigators compared conversion rate, intra-operative adverse events, operating time, wound complications, intra-abdominal complications, and postoperative hospital stay, changes in postoperative pain severity, and cosmetic outcomes during follow up period between SLA and CLA groups. Primary end points were postoperative pain severity and cosmetic satisfaction. Secondary endpoints were intra- and post-operative complication rates, operation time, and postoperative hospital stay. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Appendicitis

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT03106467
Study type	Interventional
Source	Hallym University Medical Center
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase	N/A
Start date	November 11, 2014
Completion date	August 31, 2016

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Completed	`NCT04529980` - Probiotics and Antibiotic Associated Diarrhea in Pediatric Complicated Appendicitis	N/A
Withdrawn	`NCT03528343` - Narcotic vs. Non-narcotic Pain Regimens After Pediatric Appendectomy	Phase 1/Phase 2
Recruiting	`NCT03522233` - Pediatric Appendicitis Risk Calculator (pARC) in Children With Appendix Ultrasounds
Recruiting	`NCT03380793` - A Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Morinidazole in Patients With Appendicitis	Phase 4
Recruiting	`NCT02108340` - Comparative Study of Microwave Radiometry and Ultrasonography for the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis	N/A
Terminated	`NCT02029781` - The Laparoscopic Appendicitis Score; a Multicenter Validation Study	N/A
Completed	`NCT01356641` - Antibiotic Treatment Alone for Acute Simple Appendicitis in Children	N/A
Terminated	`NCT00971438` - Structured Management of Patients With Suspicion of Appendicitis Using a Clinical Score and Selective Imaging	N/A
Completed	`NCT01515293` - Single Incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy	Phase 3
Completed	`NCT00913380` - Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis: Low-dose Computed Tomography (CT) Versus Standard-dose CT	Phase 3
Completed	`NCT00616616` - Single Incision Laparoscopy	N/A
Completed	`NCT00530998` - Minimally Invasive Surgery: Using Natural Orfices
Completed	`NCT00195351` - Study Comparing Tigecycline Versus Ceftriaxone Sodium Plus Metronidazole in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT02916134` - Conservative Versus Operative ManageMent of Acute Uncomplicated Appendicitis	N/A
Completed	`NCT04614649` - Right Iliac Fossa Treatment-Turkey Audit
Completed	`NCT04365491` - European Society for Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ESTES) Cohort Study Snapshot Audit 2020 - Acute Appendicitis
Completed	`NCT03770897` - Laparoscopic Appendectomy Performed by Junior SUrgeonS: Impact of 3D Visualization on Surgical Outcome	N/A
Completed	`NCT02507674` - Point of Care 3D Ultrasound for Pediatric Appendicitis: a Pilot Study
Active, not recruiting	`NCT01718275` - Non-operative Management of Early Appendicitis in Children
Terminated	`NCT01575028` - Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Versus Local Anesthetic for Lap Appendectomies	Phase 2

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

Practical Advantages of Single-port Over Three-port Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children — PASTA

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms