Appendectomy Clinical Trial
— EGASTAOfficial title:
Ultrasound Assessment of Gastric Content and Gastric Volume Before Crash Induction for Appendectomy
Performing anesthetic induction for appendicectomy has two main risks : first aspiraion of
gastric content causing pneumonia. Otherwise, anaphylactic risk to drugs used during
anesthetic induction. Indeed, the guidelines recommend an anesthetic induction protocol
qualified "full stomach" whatever the patient and the preoperative fasting period are. This
protocol provides the use of fast-acting neuromuscular blocking agents (succinylcholine or
rocuronium). However, these neuromuscular blocking agents are ten times more at allergic
risk than others. Ultrasound assessment of gastric content before rapid sequence induction
of anesthesia is a reproducible, non-invasive, inexpensive and quickly achievable bedside
technique. Furthermore, the correlations between gastric volume and risk of a full stomach
and also between the cross-section antral area (CSA) and the risk of a full stomach have
been validated on several patient cohorts. We formulate the hypothesis that the achievement
of a gastric ultrasound before anesthetic induction for appendectomy could allow to identify
"full stomach" patients who actually justify rapid sequence induction of anesthesia with
exposure to fast-acting neuromuscular blocking agents that implies.
Primary endpoint is to determine te percentage of patients who have a gastric content before
appendectomy. Secondary endpoint is to determine the incidenc of aspiration pneumonia and
anaphylactic shock. Another secondary endpoint is to determine the percentage of patient
with gastric content with the antral grading system (Perlas method) and to evaluate the
concordance between this methode and the cross-section antral area.
Status | Not yet recruiting |
Enrollment | 150 |
Est. completion date | September 2017 |
Est. primary completion date | August 2017 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 16 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Patient admitted to the operating room for appendectomy. - Major or minor patient (higher than 16) affiliated to a social security scheme. - Patient or parents of minor patient who received the full information relative to the organization of the study and who signed his/their informed consent(s). Exclusion Criteria: - Pregnant women. - Childbearing age patient does not have effective contraception. - Breastfeeding woman. - Minor patient under 16. - Major patient subject to a measure of legal protection or unable to consent. - Persons deprived of liberty by a judicial or an administrative decision. - Patient with gastric and/or esophagus surgery history. |
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Prevention
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
n/a |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Central Hospital, Nancy, France |
Bouvet L, Mazoit JX, Chassard D, Allaouchiche B, Boselli E, Benhamou D. Clinical assessment of the ultrasonographic measurement of antral area for estimating preoperative gastric content and volume. Anesthesiology. 2011 May;114(5):1086-92. doi: 10.1097/AL — View Citation
Perlas A, Chan VW, Lupu CM, Mitsakakis N, Hanbidge A. Ultrasound assessment of gastric content and volume. Anesthesiology. 2009 Jul;111(1):82-9. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181a97250. — View Citation
Reddy JI, Cooke PJ, van Schalkwyk JM, Hannam JA, Fitzharris P, Mitchell SJ. Anaphylaxis is more common with rocuronium and succinylcholine than with atracurium. Anesthesiology. 2015 Jan;122(1):39-45. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000512. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Cross-section antral area (CSA) | Ultrasonography exam of the stomach is used to evaluate the CSA. A CSA greater than 340mm² defines a full stomach. The calculation of the CSA is : CSA = AP x CC x p / 4 (in mm²). With AP - antero-posterior gastric antrum diameter and CC - cranio-caudal gastric antrum diameter | baseline J0 | Yes |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05075252 -
Re-assessment of Appendicitis Evaluation During Laparoscopic Appendectomy, Peritoneal Irrigation During Laparoscopic Appendectomy Does the Grade of Contamination Matter?
|
||
Completed |
NCT03349814 -
Explanations for Negative Laparoscopic Appendectomies and Normal Laparoscopies
|
||
Completed |
NCT03510923 -
Selective Rather Than Routine Histopathological Examination Following Appendectomy and Cholecystectomy
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04294537 -
TAP Block or Wound Infiltration for Laparoscopic Pediatric Appendectomy: a Pilot Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03080103 -
Appendectomy Versus Conservative Treatment for Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis
|
||
Completed |
NCT00371722 -
Appendectomy Versus no Appendectomy With Cesarean Section
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06395636 -
Early Detection of Infection Using the Fitbit in Pediatric Surgical Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05099302 -
The Effect of Cartoons Watched Before Surgery on Children's Fear Level
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04614519 -
Appendectomy by Low Impact Laparoscopy vs Routine Laparoscopy : a Randomized Prospective Monocentric Trial
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06407622 -
The Effect of Foot Reflexology on Patients Undergoing Appendectomy Surgery
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03947372 -
Comparison of Outcomes After Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy in Acute Appendicitis
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06443749 -
Closure of the Appendiceal Stump
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04464382 -
Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of a Outpatient Appendectomy
|
N/A |