Upper Airway's Pressure Drop Analyses After Mandibular Advancement and Maxillary Expansion

Apnea Clinical Trial

Official title: Skeletal, Dental and Upper Airway Changes in Skeletal Class II Division 1 Patients With the Constricted Maxilla (8-14 Years Old) Treated With Twin Block and Hyrax, Evaluated Through Pressure Drop Experimental Analysis.

Status Recruiting

Clinical Trial Summary

Breathing is a crucial function for everyone. Breathing impairment in children could lead to behavioral and cognitive problems at least. But what if orthodontic treatment could help those patients to breathe better, with less effort? This research proposal aims to find out if the increase in the upper airway volume seen in some research results can be related to a decrease in respiratory effort and an improvement in the breathing capacity of those patients. In other words, if a tube shape is changed or if a tube is enlarged, would the airflow passing inside the tube change in velocity? Or would there be more air? Therefore, investigating the pressure/airflow, volume/lumen relation and its possible changes after mandibular repositioning and maxillary expansion in children will lead to a better understanding of how orthodontics could potentially affect the upper airway. Previous studies have reported a link between mandibular advancement appliances and maxillary appliances to an increase in the upper airway volume. However, more studies are needed to evaluate the relationship between the changes in the upper airway volume and actual airflow and respiratory capability. The airway volume measurement is important to, preliminary, state if there is an increase in the upper airway after orthodontic treatment.

However a change in shape, even with the same volume, can affect the pressure and airflow. In this sense, the pressure drop analysis will allow an answer to those questions

Clinical Trial Description

Our hypotheses are:

1. There is an increase in upper airway volume and minimal cross-sectional area after maxillary expansion and mandible repositioning in class II malocclusion children using Hyrax and Twin-block.

2. There is a larger increase in the airway dimensions and a larger decrease in the air resistance (in the pressure drop analysis) in the group started with the mandibular advancement device.

3. There is a change in the shape of the upper airway after maxillary expansion and mandible repositioning in class II malocclusion children using Hyrax and Twin-block.

4. There is a correlation between the increase in airway volume, the change in shape and an increase in airflow using in vitro simulated airway experiments.

5. There is an increase in respiratory capability when evaluated with in-home portable PSG (after maxillary expansion and mandible repositioning).

6. There is a positive correlation to the in-home portable Polysomnography (PSG) with the results acquired by volume, shape, airflow and pressure drop.

Methods

The inclusion criteria are children between the ages 8-14 years old (8-12 years old girls and 9-14 years old boys), presenting skeletal class II division 1 malocclusion with maxillary constriction. The study design is a randomized crossover controlled trial. 90 patients will be randomly allocated into three groups:

Group 1: 30 patients will immediately undergo to Hyrax/Twin-block treatment, the patients will have the maxillary expansion treatment (Part I) before the mandibular repositioning (Part II).

Group 2: 30 patients will immediately undergo Twin-block/Hyrax treatment, the patients will have the mandibular repositioning treatment (Part I) done before the maxillary expansion (Part II).

Group 3: 30 patients will wait 1,5 years to begin the treatment. Since all patients are in the pre-pubertal/pubertal phase, this 1,5-year delay treatment for group 3 will neither compromise future treatment decisions nor results.

Aim 1: To determine the changes in the upper airway volume, minimal cross-sectional area, the lumen (geometry/shape), airflow, air velocity and pressure after maxillary expansion and mandibular advancement in children. Those changes will be compared between tested and control groups.

The upper airway will be assessed through Cone Bean Computed Tomography (CBCT)s exams, to analyze the volume changes before and after the use of the Twin-block and Hyrax, using the Avizo software (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Berlin, Germany). The pressure drop will be assessed using the CBCTs to generate a Stereolithography (STL) file to print upper airway models to analyze airflow, air velocity and pressure characteristics before and after the orthodontic treatment in children. Those results will be correlated. Also, the correlation will be done between tested and control groups. Pressure drop related measurements and airway volume will be assessed at T0 - before treatment, T1- after part II in the treated groups and T0 and after 1.5 years in the control group.

Aim 2: To determine changes in the in-home portable PSG results before and after maxillary expansion and mandibular repositioning and to correlate them to the results collected by the upper airway model's evaluations using pressure drop to determine airflow, velocity, pressure, and upper airway dimensions.

Patients will undergo an in-home PSG test at the beginning of treatment (T0). Groups 1 and 2 will have in-home PSG tested again after Part I and II. Group 3 will be tested at T0 and after one year. Through the CBCTs the volume and minimal cross-sectional area, and related measurements to pressure drop test will be assessed and correlated to the results from the in-home portable PSG. Likewise, the changes will be compared between tested and control groups.

Aim 3: To describe dental and skeletal changes in the class II patients undertaken the Twin-block/Hyrax treatment.

Linear measurements using craniofacial landmarks will be assessed through CBCT exams to determine the amount of skeletal and dental changes obtained. All patients will have those measurements assessed at T0. Groups 1 and 2 will also have linear measurements assessed after Part II. Group 3 will have linear measurements reassessed after 1.5 years from the first CBCT.

General information The CBCTs will be analyzed using Avizo software (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Berlin, Germany) for volume and linear measurement. Printed upper airway for the Pressure drop test for airflow/pressure drop/air velocity simulations will be made at all time-points.

All patients will have breathing capacity tested through in-home portable PSG, one week before the beginning of treatment, after parts I and II in groups 1 and 2 and at T0 and 1.5 years after the first test for group 3.

A subjective evaluation of the airway using the questionnaire Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Instrument, with 18 questions, will be given to patients. A Paediatric Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ) will also be used. An objective airway evaluation will be made using Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF) and Peak Oral Inspiratory Flow (POIF) tests, which are measured with the In-Check medical device at the same time-points as in-home PSG tests. Those tests and questionnaires will be used to correlate all the findings and clinical significance. ;

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Airway Obstruction
• Airway Obstruction, Nasal
• Apnea
• Mandible Small
• Maxillary Hypoplasia
• Nasal Obstruction

• NCT number: NCT04190953
• Study type: Interventional
• Source: University of Alberta
• Contact: Manuel Lagravere, PHD
• Phone: 7804927696
• Email: manuel@ualberta.ca
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: February 18, 2020
• Completion date: December 1, 2025