Aortic Valve Stenosis Clinical Trial
— PORTICO-1Official title:
International Long-term Follow-up Study of Patients Implanted With a Portico™ Valve
| Verified date | November 2023 |
| Source | Abbott Medical Devices |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | |
| Study type | Observational |
The purpose of this clinical investigation is to further assess the performance and safety profile of the commercially-available Portico™ TAVI System in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis.
| Status | Completed |
| Enrollment | 1032 |
| Est. completion date | October 19, 2022 |
| Est. primary completion date | September 25, 2018 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | 18 Years and older |
| Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Patient has signed the Patient Informed Consent prior to participating in the clinical investigation. - Patient has been referred for a Portico Valve implant as per Heart Team decision or patient has received a Portico Valve as per participation in an SJM sponsored regulatory or first-in-human trial. - Patient has senile degenerative aortic valve stenosis confirmed by echocardiographically derived criteria*: - An initial aortic valve area (AVA) of less than or equal to (=) 1.0 cm2 (or indexed EOA less than or equal to (=) 0.6 cm2/m2) AND - A mean gradient greater than (>)40 mmHg or jet velocity greater than (>)4.0 m/s or Doppler Velocity Index less than (<)0.25. If the mean gradient is <40 mmHg and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <55%, then the site may as well perform a dobutamine stress echo to see if the mean gradient increases to >40 mmHg." (Baseline measurement taken by echo within 6 months of index procedure.) - Patient has a life expectancy more than (>) 12 months. For patients enrolled in a French site: - Patient is at high risk for surgery as demonstrated by a Logistic EuroSCORE equal or more than (=) 20 and/or a Society of Thoracic Surgeon (STS) mortality risk score of more than (>) 10% and/or by clinical judgment of the Heart Team based on the individual risk profile (comorbidities). - Not applicable for a patient who has received a Portico Valve as per participation in an SJM sponsored Regulatory or First-In-Human trial. Exclusion Criteria: - Any case in which the Portico Valve would not be indicated for the patient as per current instructions for use (i.e any "off-label" use). - Patient has any other aortic valve than tricuspid one. - Patient has a prosthetic valve or ring in the aortic position. - Patient needs a concomitant structural heart procedure.. - Patient needs the usage of an embolic protection device. - Patient is unwilling or unable to comply with all clinical investigation-required follow-up evaluations. - Patient is pregnant |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australia | Royal Adelaide Hospital | Adelaide | |
| Australia | St Andrews Hospital | Adelaide | |
| Australia | Heart Care Partners-Wesley Hospital | Auchenflower | |
| Australia | The Prince Charles Hospital | Chermside | |
| Australia | Royal North Shore hospital | Leonards Hill | |
| Australia | The Alfred Hospital | Melbourne | |
| Australia | Royal Melbourne Hospital - City Campus | Parkville | |
| Australia | Fiona Stanley Hospital | Perth | |
| Australia | North Shore Private Hospital | St Leonards | |
| Australia | Princess Alexandra Hospital | Woolloongabba | |
| Belgium | AZ Middelheim | Antwerp | |
| Belgium | Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc | Bruxelles | |
| Belgium | CHR Citadelle | Liege | |
| Canada | Foothills Medical Centre | Calgary | |
| Canada | Queen Elizabeth II Heath Sciences | Halifax | |
| Canada | Institut de Cardiologie de Montreal (Montreal Heart Inst.) | Montreal | |
| Canada | Ottawa Heart Institute | Ottawa | |
| Canada | Institut de Cardiologie de Quebec (Hospital Laval) | Quebec | |
| Canada | Saint John Regional Hospital - New Brunswick Heart Centre | Saint John | |
| Canada | Toronto General Hospital | Toronto | |
| Canada | St. Paul's Hospital | Vancouver | |
| Denmark | Rigshospitalet | Copenhagen | |
| France | CHRU Hopital de Pontchaillou | Rennes | |
| France | CHU Rangueil Toulouse | Toulouse | |
| France | Clinique Pasteur Toulouse | Toulouse | |
| Germany | Kerckhoff-Klinik gGmbH | Bad Nauheim | |
| Germany | Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin | Berlin | |
| Germany | Universitatsmedizin Berlin - Campus Benjamin Franklin (CBF) | Berlin | |
| Germany | Immanuelklinikum Bernau und Herzzentrum Brandenburg | Bernau | |
| Germany | St Johannes Hospital | Dortmund | |
| Germany | Herzzentrum Dresden GmbH Universitatsklinik | Dresden | |
| Germany | Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universitat Frankfurt | Frankfurt | |
| Germany | Universitatsmedizin Gottingen Georg-August-Universitat | Göttingen | |
| Germany | Asklepios Klinikum St Georg | Hamburg | |
| Germany | UKE Hamburg (Universitatsklinik Eppendorf) | Hamburg | |
| Germany | Universitatsklinikum Jena | Jena | |
| Germany | Stadtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe gGmbH Medizinischen Klinik I | Karlsruhe | |
| Germany | Herzzentrum Leipzig GmbH | Leipzig | |
| Germany | Deutsches Herzzentrum Munchen des Freistaates Bayern | Munchen | |
| Israel | Kaplan Medical Center | Re?ovot | |
| Italy | Clinica Citta di Alessandria | Alessandria | |
| Italy | Azienda Ospedali V. Emanuele Ferrarotto E S. Bambino | Catania | |
| Italy | Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio - Ospedale del Cuore | Massa | |
| Italy | Istituto Sant'Ambrogio | Milan | |
| Italy | Ospedale Niguarda Ca'Granda | Milan | |
| Italy | Ospedale San Raffaele | Milan | |
| Italy | PoliclinicoSan Donato | Milan | |
| Italy | Centro Cardiologico Monzino | Milano | |
| Italy | Policlinico di Monza | Monza | |
| Lithuania | Vilnius University Hospital Santarisku KLinikos | Vilnius | |
| Netherlands | OLVG | Amsterdam | |
| Netherlands | Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden | Leeuwarden | |
| Spain | Hospital de la Santa Creu I Sant Pau | Barcelona | |
| Spain | Hospital Clinico Universitario Virgen de Arrixaca | El Palmar | |
| Spain | Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena | Sevilla | |
| Switzerland | Universitatspital Spital Zurich | Zurich | |
| United Kingdom | Royal Victoria Hospital | Belfast | |
| United Kingdom | The Royal Sussex Country Hospital | Brighton | |
| United Kingdom | Kings College Hospital | London | |
| United Kingdom | Morriston hospital-ABM University Health Board | Morriston |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| Abbott Medical Devices |
Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Lithuania, Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom,
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With All-cause Mortality | Percentage of participants that died for any reason at 1 year post implantation | 1 year post implant | |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With All Cause Mortality in Cohort A | Percentage of participants that died for any reason at 30 days through 5 years post implantation | 30 days through 5 years post implant | |
| Secondary | Number of Participants With All-cause Mortality (30 Days, Annually From 1 Year Through 5 Years) in Cohort B | Number of participants who died for any reason at different time points such as 30 days, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years and 5 years. | 30 days through 5 years post implant | |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Cardiovascular Mortality as Defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A | Percentage of participants that died for cardiovascular or unknown reasons as defined by VARC-2 at 30 days through 5 years post implantation | 30 days through 5 years post implant | |
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Cardiovascular Mortality Occurring at Each Time Window (30 Days, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years and 5 Years) in Cohort B | Number of participants who died for any reason at different time points such as 30 days, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years and 5 years. | 30 days through 5 years post implant | |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Non-Cardiovascular Mortality as Defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A | Percentage of participants that died for any reason at 30 days through 5 years post implantation | 30 days through 5 years post implant | |
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Non-Cardiovascular Mortality Occurring at Each Time Window (30 Days, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years and 5 Years) in Cohort B | Number of participants who died for any reason at different time points such as 30 days, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years and 5 years. | 30 days through 5 years post implant | |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Myocardial Infarction as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A | Percentage of participants with a myocardial infarction as defined by VARC-2 at 30 days through 5 years post implantation post implantation | 30 days through 5 years post implant | |
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Myocardial Infarction as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort B | Number of participants with a myocardial infarction as defined by VARC-2 at 30 days through 5 years post implantation post implantation | 30 days through 5 years post implant | |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Vascular Access Site Complication as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A | Percentage of participants with vascular access site complication (major or minor) as defined by VARC-2 at 30 days post implantation | 30 days post implant | |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Bleeding Events as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A | Percentage of participants with a bleeding events (life threatening, major or minor) as defined by VARC-2 at 30 days post implantation | 30 days post implant | |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Stage 1, 2 and 3 Acute Kidney Injury as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A | Percentage of participants with a Stage 1, 2 or Stage 3 acute kidney injury as defined by VARC-2 at 30 days post implantation | 30 days post implant | |
| Secondary | Mean Prosthetic Valve Function as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) (Aortic Valve Area) | The aortic valve area as interpreted by an independent echocardiographic core laboratory at 30 days through 5 years post implantation | 30 days through 5 years post implant | |
| Secondary | Mean Prosthetic Valve Function as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) (Mean Transvalvular Gradient) | The mean transvalvular gradient as interpreted by an independent echocardiographic core laboratory at 30 days through 5 years post implantation | 30 days through 5 years post implant | |
| Secondary | Number of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification of Heart Failure | The New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification provides a simple way of classifying the extent of heart failure. It classifies patients in one of four categories based on their limitations during physical activity:
Class I - No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity; Class II - Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity; Class III - Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms; Class IV - Severe limitations. |
30 days post implant | |
| Secondary | Number of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification of Heart Failure | The New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification provides a simple way of classifying the extent of heart failure. It classifies patients in one of four categories based on their limitations during physical activity:
Class I - No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity; Class II - Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity; Class III - Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms; Class IV - Severe limitations. |
1 year post implant | |
| Secondary | Number of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification of Heart Failure | The New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification provides a simple way of classifying the extent of heart failure. It classifies patients in one of four categories based on their limitations during physical activity:
Class I - No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity; Class II - Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity; Class III - Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms; Class IV - Severe limitations. |
2 years post implant | |
| Secondary | Number of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification of Heart Failure | The New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification provides a simple way of classifying the extent of heart failure. It classifies patients in one of four categories based on their limitations during physical activity:
Class I - No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity; Class II - Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity; Class III - Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms; Class IV - Severe limitations. |
3 years post implant | |
| Secondary | Number of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification of Heart Failure | The New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification provides a simple way of classifying the extent of heart failure. It classifies patients in one of four categories based on their limitations during physical activity:
Class I - No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity; Class II - Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity; Class III - Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms; Class IV - Severe limitations. |
4 years post implant | |
| Secondary | Number of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification of Heart Failure | The New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification provides a simple way of classifying the extent of heart failure. It classifies patients in one of four categories based on their limitations during physical activity:
Class I - No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity; Class II - Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity; Class III - Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms; Class IV - Severe limitations. |
5 years post implant | |
| Secondary | Mean Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) | Distance in metres that the participant can walk in 6 minutes. The six-minute walking test (6MWT) is a commonly used objective measure of functional exercise capacity in individuals with moderately severe impairment. | 30 days through 5 years post implant | |
| Secondary | Mean Quality of Life Assessment in Cohort A | EuroQuol-5 Dimensions (EQ5D) is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome applicable to a wide range of health conditions and treatments. A visual analog scale (VAS) for health is also included in the measure as a patient-reported estimate of overall health status. This scale ranges between 0-100, where 0 is 'the worst health you can imagine' and 100 is 'the best health you can imagine'. | 30 days and 1 year post implant | |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Transient Ischemic Attack in Cohort A | Percentage of participants with transient ischemic attack as defined by VARC-2 at 30 days through 5 years post implantation | 30 days through 5 years post implantation | |
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Transient Ischemic Attack in Cohort B | Number of participants with transient ischemic attack as defined by VARC-2 at 30 days through 5 years post implantation | 30 days through 5 years post implantation | |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Stroke as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A | Percentage of participants with a stroke (disabling and non-disabling) as defined by VARC-2 at 30 days post implantation | 30 days post implant | |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Stroke as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A | Percentage of participants with a stroke (disabling and non-disabling) as defined by VARC-2 at 1 year post implantation | 1 year post implant | |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Stroke as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A | Percentage of participants with a stroke (disabling and non-disabling) as defined by VARC-2 at 2 years post implantation | 2 years post implant | |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Stroke as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A | Percentage of participants with a stroke (disabling and non-disabling) as defined by VARC-2 at 3 years post implantation | 3 years post implant | |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Stroke as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A | Percentage of participants with a stroke (disabling and non-disabling) as defined by VARC-2 at 4 years post implantation | 4 years post implant | |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Stroke as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A | Percentage of participants with a stroke (disabling and non-disabling) as defined by VARC-2 at 5 years post implantation | 5 years post implant | |
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Stroke as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort B | Number of participants with a stroke (disabling and non-disabling) as defined by VARC-2 at 2 years post implantation | 2 years post implant | |
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Stroke as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort B | Number of participants with a stroke (disabling and non-disabling) as defined by VARC-2 at 3 years post implantation | 3 years post implant | |
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Stroke as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort B | Number of participants with a stroke (disabling and non-disabling) as defined by VARC-2 at 4 years post implantation | 4 years post implant | |
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Stroke as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort B | Number of participants with a stroke (disabling and non-disabling) as defined by VARC-2 at 5 years post implantation | 5 years post implant | |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Conduction Disturbances and Cardiac Arrythmias as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A | Percentage of participants with a conduction disturbances and cardiac arrhythmias as defined by VARC-2 at 30 days post implantation | 30 days post implant | |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Conduction Disturbances and Cardiac Arrythmias as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A | Percentage of participants with a conduction disturbances and cardiac arrhythmias as defined by VARC-2 at 1 year post implantation | 1 year post implant | |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Conduction Disturbances and Cardiac Arrythmias as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A | Percentage of participants with a conduction disturbances and cardiac arrhythmias as defined by VARC-2 at 2 years post implantation | 2 years post implant | |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Conduction Disturbances and Cardiac Arrythmias as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A | Percentage of participants with a conduction disturbances and cardiac arrhythmias as defined by VARC-2 at 3 years post implantation | 3 years post implant | |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Conduction Disturbances and Cardiac Arrythmias as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A | Percentage of participants with a conduction disturbances and cardiac arrhythmias as defined by VARC-2 at 4 years post implantation | 4 years post implant | |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Conduction Disturbances and Cardiac Arrythmias as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A | Percentage of participants with a conduction disturbances and cardiac arrhythmias as defined by VARC-2 at 5 years post implantation | 5 years post implant | |
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Conduction Disturbances and Cardiac Arrythmias as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort B | Number of participants with a conduction disturbances and cardiac arrhythmias as defined by VARC-2 at 2 years post implantation | 2 years post implant | |
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Conduction Disturbances and Cardiac Arrythmias as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort B | Number of participants with a conduction disturbances and cardiac arrhythmias as defined by VARC-2 at 3 years post implantation | 3 years post implant | |
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Conduction Disturbances and Cardiac Arrythmias as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort B | Number of participants with a conduction disturbances and cardiac arrhythmias as defined by VARC-2 at 4 years post implantation | 4 years post implant | |
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Conduction Disturbances and Cardiac Arrythmias as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort B | Number of participants with a conduction disturbances and cardiac arrhythmias as defined by VARC-2 at 5 years post implantation | 5 years post implant | |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Prosthetic Valve Function as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) (Paravalvular Aortic Regurgitation) in Cohort A | Percentage of participants with a paravalvular aortic regurgitation as defined by VARC-2 at 30 days post implantation | 30 days post implant | |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Prosthetic Valve Function as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) (Paravalvular Aortic Regurgitation) in Cohort A | Percentage of participants with a paravalvular aortic regurgitation as defined by VARC-2 at 1 year post implantation | 1 year post implant | |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Prosthetic Valve Function as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) (Paravalvular Aortic Regurgitation) | Percentage of participants with a paravalvular aortic regurgitation as defined by VARC-2 at 2 years post implantation | 2 years post implant | |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Prosthetic Valve Function as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) (Paravalvular Aortic Regurgitation) | Percentage of participants with a paravalvular aortic regurgitation as defined by VARC-2 at 3 years post implantation | 3 years post implant | |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Prosthetic Valve Function as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) (Paravalvular Aortic Regurgitation) | Percentage of participants with a paravalvular aortic regurgitation as defined by VARC-2 at 4 years post implantation | 4 years post implant | |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Prosthetic Valve Function as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) (Paravalvular Aortic Regurgitation) | Percentage of participants with a paravalvular aortic regurgitation as defined by VARC-2 at 5 years post implantation | 5 years post implant |
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Completed |
NCT03186339 -
Validation of the "TASQ" in Patients Undergoing SAVR or TF-TAVI
|
||
| Recruiting |
NCT03549559 -
Imaging Histone Deacetylase in the Heart
|
N/A | |
| Terminated |
NCT02854319 -
REpositionable Percutaneous Replacement of NatIve StEnotic Aortic Valve Through Implantation of LOTUS EDGE Valve System
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05601453 -
The ReTAVI Prospective Observational Registry
|
||
| Withdrawn |
NCT05481814 -
CPX in Paradoxical Low Flow Aortic Stenosis
|
||
| Completed |
NCT02241109 -
Predicting Aortic Stenosis Progression by Measuring Serum Calcification Propensity
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT01700439 -
Surgical Treatment of Aortic Stenosis With a Next Generation, Rapid Deployment Surgical Aortic Valve
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT04429035 -
SLOW-Slower Progress of caLcificatiOn With Vitamin K2
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT04103931 -
Impact of a Patient Decision Aid for Treatment of Aortic Stenosis
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03950440 -
Assessing the Incidence of Postoperative Delirium Following Aortic Valve Replacement
|
||
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT02661451 -
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement to UNload the Left Ventricle in Patients With ADvanced Heart Failure (TAVR UNLOAD)
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT02847546 -
Evaluation of the BARD® True™ Flow Valvuloplasty Perfusion Catheter for Aortic Valve Dilatation
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT02758964 -
Evaluation of Cerebral Thrombembolism After TAVR
|
||
| Completed |
NCT02792452 -
Clinical Value of Stress Echocardiography in Moderate Aortic Stenosis
|
||
| Not yet recruiting |
NCT02536703 -
Safety and Efficacy of Lotus Valve For TAVI In Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis In Chinese Population
|
Phase 3 | |
| Not yet recruiting |
NCT02541877 -
Sizing-sTrategy of Bicuspid AoRtic Valve Stenosis With Transcatheter Self-expandable Valve
|
Phase 3 | |
| Completed |
NCT02249000 -
BIOVALVE - I / II Clincial Investigation
|
N/A | |
| Not yet recruiting |
NCT02221921 -
Safety and Efficacy Study of MicroPort's Transcatheter Aortic Valve and Delivery System for TAVI
|
N/A | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT02080299 -
Protection by Remote Ischemic Preconditioning During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
|
Phase 2 | |
| Terminated |
NCT01939678 -
Characterization and Role of Mutations in Sodium-phosphate Cotransporters in Patients With Calcific Aortic Valve Disease
|