AOM - Acute Otitis Media Clinical Trial
— OTTEROfficial title:
A Prospective, Single-arm, Multicenter Study to Evaluate Effectiveness and Safety of Tympanostomy Tube Placement Using the Tula Iontophoresis and Tube Delivery Systems for Children in an Office Setting.
Verified date | May 2022 |
Source | Tusker Medical |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
A prospective, single-arm, multicenter study to evaluate effectiveness and safety of Tymbion iontophoresis and tympanostomy tube placement using the Tula Iontophoresis and Tube Delivery Systems for children in an office setting.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 370 |
Est. completion date | March 25, 2021 |
Est. primary completion date | February 28, 2019 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 6 Months to 12 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Males or females at least 6 months old through 12 years old at time of consent 2. Indication for tympanostomy tube insertion per Clinical Practice Guideline 3. Behavioral capacity and cooperative temperament to undergo an awake procedure, based on physician judgment (not applicable to OR Lead-In subjects) 4. Subject's parent/guardian and subject are able and willing to comply with the protocol and attend all study visits 5. Subject's parent/guardian and subject are able and willing to provide informed consent or assent as age appropriate Exclusion Criteria: 1. Significantly atrophic, retracted, bimeric, monomeric or atelectatic tympanic membrane 2. Perforated tympanic membrane 3. Otitis externa 4. Active or recent conditions of the tympanic membrane (eg, prior myringotomy with incomplete wound healing or re-epithelization) 5. Hemotympanum 6. Damaged/denuded skin in the auditory canal 7. Cerumen impaction resulting in a significant amount of cleaning required to visualize the tympanic membrane potentially causing abrasion or irritation to the external ear canal 8. Anatomy that precludes sufficient visualization of and access to the tympanic membrane 9. Anatomy that necessitates tympanostomy tube placement in the posterior half of the tympanic membrane 10. History of sensitivity or allergic reaction to lidocaine HCl, tetracaine, epinephrine, or any hypersensitivity to local anesthetics of the amide type, or any component of the anesthetic drug formulation (not applicable to OR Lead-In subjects) 11. Familial history of insensitivity to lidocaine or other local anesthetics of the amide type (eg, history of inadequate anesthesia with dental numbing agents). (not applicable to OR Lead-In subjects) 12. Electrically sensitive medical support systems (eg, pacemakers, defibrillators, cochlear implants) 13. Other conditions that would preclude performing the study procedure including iontophoresis system ear plug incompatibility. 14. Health conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, would present undue risk to the subject, based on device/anesthetic drug product label warnings and precautions. 15. Subject is 4 years or older and not able to complete all baseline assessments. Subject is younger than 4 years and not able to complete all baseline assessments, not including audiometry. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Canada | British Columbia Children's Hospital | Vancouver | British Columbia |
United States | Ear Nose and Throat Specialists of Abilene | Abilene | Texas |
United States | Albany ENT & Allergy Services | Albany | New York |
United States | Specialty Physician Associates | Bethlehem | Pennsylvania |
United States | California Head and Neck Specialists | Carlsbad | California |
United States | Charlotte Ear Eye Nose & Throat Associates, PA | Charlotte | North Carolina |
United States | South Florida Pediatric Otolaryngology | Fort Lauderdale | Florida |
United States | Collin County ENT | Frisco | Texas |
United States | Frisco ENT for Children | Frisco | Texas |
United States | Connecticut Children's Medical Center | Hartford | Connecticut |
United States | Nemour's Children's Specialty Care | Jacksonville | Florida |
United States | Advanced ENT & Allergy | Louisville | Kentucky |
United States | South Carolina Ear Nose and Throat | Lugoff | South Carolina |
United States | Yale School of Medicine, Section of Otolaryngology | New Haven | Connecticut |
United States | Columbia University Medical Center | New York | New York |
United States | Carolina Ear Nose and Throat Clinic | Orangeburg | South Carolina |
United States | Sacramento ENT | Roseville | California |
United States | Ear Medical Group | San Antonio | Texas |
United States | Camino Ear Nose & Throat Clinic | San Jose | California |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Tusker Medical |
United States, Canada,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Procedural Success: | Count (and percentage) of subjects in the pivotal cohort with successful placement of Tusker Medical tympanostomy tubes in all indicated ears in an office procedure. Note: the primary endpoint applies only to the Pivotal Cohort, and not to the OR Lead-In or Office Lead-In cohorts. | Day of Procedure (Day 0) Immediately following tube placement | |
Primary | Tube Placement Tolerability | Mean subject-reported pain score following TDS tube placement using the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) (pivotal cohort children ages 5 and older only). The FPS-R has 6 faces which permits scaling to a 0-to-10 scoring system in intervals of 2 (ie 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10), where 0 represents 'no pain' and 10 represents 'very much pain'. Note- the primary endpoint applies only to the Pivotal Cohort, and not to the OR Lead-In or Office Lead-In cohorts. | Day of Procedure (Day 0) Immediately following tube placement | |
Secondary | Tube Patency | Count (and percentage) of subjects in the pivotal cohort, in which a Tusker Medical tube was successfully placed, with functionally patent tube(s) at the 3-week post-procedure follow-up visit.
Note- thus secondary endpoint applies only to the Pivotal Cohort, and not to the OR Lead-In or Office Lead-In cohorts. Note - This endpoint includes subjects for which at least 1 ear had successful tube placement. For bilateral subjects, they may be considered a non-successful procedure if only 1 ear had successful tube placement, however would be evaluated for the Tube Patency endpoint for the ear that was successful. |
3 Weeks Post Procedure | |
Secondary | Tube Retention | Count (percentage) of subjects in the pivotal cohort, in which a Tusker Medical tube(s) was successfully placed, with presence of a Tusker Medical tube across the TM in all successfully treated ears at the 3-week post-procedure follow-up visit.
Note- the secondary endpoint applies only to the Pivotal Cohort, and not to the OR Lead-In or Office Lead-In cohorts. Note - This endpoint includes subjects for which at least 1 ear had successful tube placement. For bilateral subjects, they may be considered a non-successful procedure if only 1 ear had successful tube placement, however would be evaluated for the Tube Retention endpoint for the ear that was successful. |
3 Weeks Post Procedure | |
Secondary | Anesthesia Effectiveness | Count (percentage) of subjects in the pivotal cohort, who completed iontophoresis for all indicated ears, with adequate anesthesia for TT placement in all treated ears as determined by physician's evaluation of TM anesthesia prior to tube placement.
Note- the secondary endpoint applies only to the Pivotal Cohort, and not to the OR Lead-In or Office Lead-In cohorts. |
Day of Procedure (Day 0) |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05361239 -
Delayed Antibiotic Therapy in General Practice
|
||
Completed |
NCT03197558 -
Adult Study to Evaluate Placement of Tympanostomy Tubes In-office (ADEPT)
|
Phase 2 |