Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether reenforcement with polypropylen mesh compared with traditional anterior colporrhaphy for anterior vaginal wall prolapse results in fewer recurrences.


Clinical Trial Description

Anterior vaginal wall prolapse is the most common type of pelvic organ prolapse in postmenopausal women. This anatomic defect has traditionally been repaired with anterior colporrhaphy plication, a series of interrupted stitches being the main surgical component. The procedure is associated with a high recurrence rate, up to 32 % even after using paravaginal repair along with anterior colporrhaphy.It has been sought to resolve the problem of recurrence using artificial mesh as in the repair of abdominal hernias.

Comparison: Anterior vaginal wall repair with or without reinforcement with polypropylene mesh were compared in a prospective randomized study ;


Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT00420225
Study type Interventional
Source University of Tampere
Contact
Status Completed
Phase Phase 3
Start date April 2003
Completion date May 2008

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT02209337 - Demonstrate the Safety and Preformance of the SRS Device for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse N/A
Recruiting NCT02469584 - Small Stitch Study N/A
Completed NCT01393171 - Anterior Colporrhaphy Versus Cystocele Repair Using Polypropylene Mesh or Porcine Dermis N/A
Recruiting NCT06429228 - Comparison of 1 Versus 2 Days Post-Operative Catheterization After Anterior Colporrhaphy N/A