Ankle Sprain Clinical Trial
Official title:
An Open Label Randomized Multicenter Comparative Study On Celecoxib Efficacy And Safety Versus Non-Selective NSAID In Acute Pain Due To Ankle Sprain
NCT number | NCT00446797 |
Other study ID # | A3191332 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Completed |
Phase | Phase 4 |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | May 2007 |
Est. completion date | April 2008 |
Verified date | February 2021 |
Source | Pfizer |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
To assess the efficacy of celecoxib loading dose of 400mg followed by 200 mg twice a day (BID) versus oral non-selective NSAIDs in acute pain due to ankle sprain.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 278 |
Est. completion date | April 2008 |
Est. primary completion date | April 2008 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Patients with first acute ankle sprain episode in the last six months classified as grade I or II, confirmed by X-rays, according to the following definitions: - Grade I: When the ligament is stretched but not torn and the anterior talofibular ligament is usually involved. The anterior draw test is negative. - Grade II: Moderate sprains which usually result in partial tears af the ligaments, primarily the anterior talofibular and possibly the calcaneofibular ligament. Ligamentous laxity may be present and there is moderate swelling. Exclusion Criteria: - Patients who have a similar injury of the same joint within the last six months; or - clinical evidence of complete rupture of ankle ligaments (third degree sprain), or - requirements for bed rest, hospitalization, surgical intervention for the ankle injury; or - evidence of fractures; or non-removable full cast of any tipe; or - presence of bilateral occurrence of ankle injury or ipsilateral ankle and knee injury. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Brazil | Pfizer Investigational Site | Goiânia | GO |
Brazil | Pfizer Investigational Site | Rio de Janeiro | RJ |
Brazil | Pfizer Investigational Site | São Paulo | SP |
Brazil | Pfizer Investigational Site | São Paulo | SP |
Costa Rica | Pfizer Investigational Site | San Antonio Guadalupe | Guadalupe, San Jose |
Ecuador | Pfizer Investigational Site | Quito | Pichincha |
Egypt | Pfizer Investigational Site | Cairo | |
Jordan | Pfizer Investigational Site | Amman | |
Jordan | Pfizer Investigational Site | Amman | |
Jordan | Pfizer Investigational Site | Amman | |
Mexico | Pfizer Investigational Site | Mexico | DF |
Mexico | Pfizer Investigational Site | México DF | |
Mexico | Pfizer Investigational Site | San Nicolas de los Garza | Nuevo León |
Mexico | Pfizer Investigational Site | Toluca | Estado De México |
Panama | Pfizer Investigational Site | Panama City | |
Peru | Pfizer Investigational Site | Lima |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc. |
Brazil, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Egypt, Jordan, Mexico, Panama, Peru,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Change From Baseline at Day 3 in Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Per Protocol Population | Assessment of ankle pain by VAS: 100 mm horizontal line with left end being "No Pain" & right end being "Worst Possible Pain". Participants drew vertical line on horizontal scale to best reflect current pain on full weight bearing of injured ankle. Distance from left end of line to mark. Change: mean score at day 3 minus mean score at baseline | Baseline and day 3 | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Modified Intent to Treat Population | Assessment of ankle pain by VAS: 100 mm horizontal line, left end being "No Pain" & right end being "Worst Possible Pain". Participants drew vertical line on horizontal scale to best reflect current pain on full weight bearing of injured ankle. Distance from left end of line to mark. Change: mean score at observation minus mean score at baseline | Baseline and days 2, 3 and 7 | |
Secondary | Number of Subjects Responding (Improving) - MITT Population | The number of subjects showing a response: a decrease of at least 20 mm (that is improvement) on the pain visual analog scale (VAS) scale | Days 2, 3 and 7 | |
Secondary | Subject's Global Assessment of Ankle Injury | Subject response to question: "Considering all the ways your ankle injury affects you, how are you doing today?" Scale: 5 point from 1 = very good (no symptoms and no limitation of normal activities) to 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). | Days 2, 3 and 7 | |
Secondary | Physician Global Assessment of Ankle Injury | Investigator evaluation of overall severity of ankle injury. Scale: 5 point from 1 = Very mild (very mild signs and symptoms of ankle sprain) to 5 =Very severe (very severe signs and symptoms of ankle sprain) | Days 3 and 7 | |
Secondary | Pain Relief - MITT Population | Subject's response to the statement "My relief from starting pain is". Scale from 0 = None to 4 = Complete. | Days 2, 3 and 7 | |
Secondary | Subject Assessment of Normal Function / Activity | Subject response to question: "How does your ankle injury affect your walking and normal activity?" Scale from 1 = Normal walking/activity and no pain to 5 = Severely restricted walking due to pain and can't resume normal activities (normal activities defined as all activity that a subject did on a routine basis, including work and recreation) | Days 2, 3 and 7 | |
Secondary | Modified Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (m-BPI-sf) - Pain Severity Question 1 | m-BPI-sf questionnaire assessed pain severity and pain interference with functional activities during the 24 hour follow-up period.
Q1: Subject response to 'describe your pain at its worst in the last 24 hours'. Scale: 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine |
Days 1, 3 and 7 | |
Secondary | Modified Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (m-BPI-sf) - Pain Severity Question 2 | m-BPI-sf questionnaire assessed pain severity and pain interference with functional activities during the 24 hour follow-up period.
Q2: Subject response to 'describe your pain at its least in the last 24 hours'. Scale: 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine |
Days 2, 3 and 7 | |
Secondary | Modified Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (m-BPI-sf) - Pain Severity Question 3 | m-BPI-sf questionnaire assessed pain severity and pain interference with functional activities during the 24 hour follow-up period.
Q3: Subject response to 'describe your pain on the average'. Scale: 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine |
Days 2, 3 and 7 | |
Secondary | Modified Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (m-BPI-sf) - Pain Severity Question 4 | m-BPI-sf questionnaire assessed pain severity and pain interference with functional activities during the 24 hour follow-up period.
Q4: Subject response to 'how much pain you have right now'. Scale: 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine |
Days 2, 3 and 7 | |
Secondary | Modified Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (m-BPI-sf) - Pain Severity Index | m-BPI-sf questionnaire assessed pain severity and pain interference with functional activities during the 24 hour follow-up period.
Pain severity index is the average of the pain severity questions 1 to 4. Scale: 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine |
Days 2, 3 and 7 | |
Secondary | Modified Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (m-BPI-sf) - Pain Interference Question 5A | m-BPI-sf questionnaire assessed pain severity and pain interference with functional activities during the 24 hour follow-up period.
Q5A: Subject response to 'how, during the past 24 hours, pain has interfered with your general activity. Scale: 0 = does not interfere to 10 = completely interferes |
Days 2, 3 and 7 | |
Secondary | Modified Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (m-BPI-sf) - Pain Interference Question 5B | m-BPI-sf questionnaire assessed pain severity and pain interference with functional activities during the 24 hour follow-up period.
Q5B: Subject response to 'how, during the past 24 hours, pain has interfered with your mood'. Scale: 0 = does not interfere to 10 = completely interferes |
Days 2, 3 and 7 | |
Secondary | Modified Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (m-BPI-sf) - Pain Interference Question 5C | m-BPI-sf questionnaire assessed pain severity and pain interference with functional activities during the 24 hour follow-up period.
Q5C: Subject response to 'how, during the past 24 hours, pain has interfered with your walking ability'. Scale: 0 = does not interfere to 10 = completely interferes |
Days 2, 3 and 7 | |
Secondary | Modified Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (m-BPI-sf) - Pain Interference Question 5D | m-BPI-sf questionnaire assessed pain severity and pain interference with functional activities during the 24 hour follow-up period.
Q5D: Subject response to 'how, during the past 24 hours, pain has interfered with your normal work (work outside the home and housework)'. Scale: 0 = does not interfere to 10 = completely interferes |
Days 2, 3 and 7 | |
Secondary | Modified Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (m-BPI-sf) - Pain Interference Question 5E | m-BPI-sf questionnaire assessed pain severity and pain interference with functional activities during the 24 hour follow-up period.
Q5E: Subject response to 'how, during the past 24 hours, pain has interfered with your relations with other people'. Scale: 0 = does not interfere to 10 = completely interferes |
Days 2, 3 and 7 | |
Secondary | Modified Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (m-BPI-sf) - Pain Interference Question 5F | m-BPI-sf questionnaire assessed pain severity and pain interference with functional activities during the 24 hour follow-up period.
Q5F: Subject response to 'how, during the past 24 hours, pain has interfered with your sleep'. Scale: 0 = does not interfere to 10 = completely interferes |
Days 2, 3 and 7 | |
Secondary | Modified Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (m-BPI-sf) - Pain Interference Question 5G | m-BPI-sf questionnaire assessed pain severity and pain interference with functional activities during the 24 hour follow-up period.
Q5G: Subject response to 'how, during the past 24 hours, pain has interfered with your enjoyment of life'. Scale: 0 = does not interfere to 10 = completely interferes |
Days 2, 3 and 7 | |
Secondary | Modified Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (m-BPI-sf) - Pain Interference Index | m-BPI-sf questionnaire assessed pain severity and pain interference with functional activities during the 24 hour follow-up period.
The pain interference index is the average of pain interference questions 5A to 5G. Scale: 0 = does not interfere to 10 = completely interferes |
Days 2, 3 and 7 |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT02246361 -
Impact of Six Patient Information Leaflets (PIL) on Doctor Patient Communication
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01438905 -
Effect of Joint Mobilization in the Treatment of Chronic Ankle Instability
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04095598 -
Computed Tomography With Stress Maneuvers for Evaluation of Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Instability (CTMETS)
|
||
Completed |
NCT01957215 -
Efficacy of Topical Indomethacin Patch Over Placebo in Ankle Sprain Pain Relief
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01561365 -
Applicability of the Ottawa Ankle Rules
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT01446341 -
Cast Immobilization Versus Functional Therapy for Acute, Severe Lateral Ankle Sprains
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01255423 -
Efficacy and Safety of Diclofenac Sodium Topical Gel 1% Applied 4 Times Daily in Subjects With Acute Ankle Sprain
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00797368 -
Manual Therapy and Exercise Versus Home Exercises in the Management of Patients Status Post Ankle Sprain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00573768 -
Efficacy and Safety of Diclofenac Diethylamine 2.32% Gel in Patients With Acute Ankle Sprain
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02324270 -
Safety and Efficacy of Generic Diclofenac Epolamine Acute Pain Due to Minor Ankle Sprain
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02433964 -
Evaluation of Therapeutic Effects of LED (627 +/- 10nm) The Initial Phase of the Ankle Sprains Treatment
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02682303 -
Effect of Elastic Bandage on Balance in Chronic Ankle Instability
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02330198 -
Validation of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure Tool in Finnish
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02097940 -
Influence of Sensorimotor Treatment in the Balance of Soccer
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01423513 -
Effects of Ankle Support on Muscle Activation and Function
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01449760 -
Ankle Sprain Rehabilitation With the Wii Balance Board
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02491736 -
Ketoprofen Gel vs Placebo in Children With Ankle Sprain
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT02945618 -
Neurocryostimulation for Acute Lateral Ankle Sprain
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02729207 -
Proof-of-concept Study of NSAID Hydrogel Patch in Treatment of Acute Pain
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00927641 -
HKT-500 in the Treatment of Adult Patients With Ankle Sprain
|
Phase 3 |