Ankle Fractures Clinical Trial
Official title:
Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Pilot Study
This is a pilot randomized controlled trial, wherein the intervention group will undergo NMES five days a week beginning three weeks postoperative and lasting for ten weeks. Both the control and intervention groups will start standard physical therapy six weeks postoperative. Primary outcome measure will be the isometric strength of the gastrocnemius muscle. The secondary outcomes will comprise subjective clinical evaluations (using the Lower Extremity Functional Scale [LEFS]), functional assessments such as the sit-to-stand test, 2-minute walk test, stair climb test and objective clinical evaluation using contralateral comparison of calf circumference.
Status | Not yet recruiting |
Enrollment | 20 |
Est. completion date | August 2024 |
Est. primary completion date | August 2024 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 70 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Capable and willing to provide informed consent - Undergoing a procedure that involves repairing an ankle fracture. Exclusion Criteria: Patients with medical histories that include: - Rheumatoid arthritis - Connective tissue disorders - Chronic corticosteroid use - Implanted electrical devices - Neurological disorders - Non-ambulatory status - Recent surgery (within the last 3 months) that is not related to the study - Scheduled to undergo surgery in the near future - Epilepsy - Diagnosed with cancer - Have suffered acute trauma or recently have had a surgical procedure (not related to the study) - Have cardiac problems or cardiac disease - Have an abdominal hernia - Have venous thrombosis |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | NYU Langone Health | New York | New York |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
NYU Langone Health |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Isometric Strength of Gastrocnemius Muscle | Measured using Biodex dynamometer. | Week 6 | |
Primary | Isometric Strength of Gastrocnemius Muscle | Measured using Biodex dynamometer. | Week 9 | |
Primary | Isometric Strength of Gastrocnemius Muscle | Measured using Biodex dynamometer. | Week 12 | |
Primary | Bilateral Calf Circumference | Week 6 | ||
Primary | Bilateral Calf Circumference | Week 9 | ||
Primary | Bilateral Calf Circumference | Week 12 | ||
Secondary | Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) Questionnaire Score | LEFS is a 20-item questionnaire assessing functional impairment in patients with disorders affecting one or both lower extremities. Each item is rated on a scale ranging from 0 to 4: 0 indicates inability to perform the activity or extreme difficulty, 1 indicates considerable difficulty, 2 indicates moderate difficulty, 3 indicates slight difficulty, and 4 indicates no difficulty. The score is the sum of responses and ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 80, with lower scores indicating greater disability. | Week 6 | |
Secondary | Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) Questionnaire Score | LEFS is a 20-item questionnaire assessing functional impairment in patients with disorders affecting one or both lower extremities. Each item is rated on a scale ranging from 0 to 4: 0 indicates inability to perform the activity or extreme difficulty, 1 indicates considerable difficulty, 2 indicates moderate difficulty, 3 indicates slight difficulty, and 4 indicates no difficulty. The score is the sum of responses and ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 80, with lower scores indicating greater disability. | Week 9 | |
Secondary | Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) Questionnaire Score | LEFS is a 20-item questionnaire assessing functional impairment in patients with disorders affecting one or both lower extremities. Each item is rated on a scale ranging from 0 to 4: 0 indicates inability to perform the activity or extreme difficulty, 1 indicates considerable difficulty, 2 indicates moderate difficulty, 3 indicates slight difficulty, and 4 indicates no difficulty. The score is the sum of responses and ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 80, with lower scores indicating greater disability. | Week 12 | |
Secondary | Sit-to-Stand Test | The sit-to-stand test involves recording the number of stands a person can complete in 30 seconds. | Week 6 | |
Secondary | Sit-to-Stand Test | The sit-to-stand test involves recording the number of stands a person can complete in 30 seconds. | Week 9 | |
Secondary | Sit-to-Stand Test | The sit-to-stand test involves recording the number of stands a person can complete in 30 seconds. | Week 12 | |
Secondary | 2 Minute Walk Test | In this activity, the participant is encouraged to walk as fast as they can, safely, without assistance for two minutes and the distance is measured | Week 6 | |
Secondary | 2 Minute Walk Test | In this activity, the participant is encouraged to walk as fast as they can, safely, without assistance for two minutes and the distance is measured | Week 9 | |
Secondary | 2 Minute Walk Test | In this activity, the participant is encouraged to walk as fast as they can, safely, without assistance for two minutes and the distance is measured | Week 12 | |
Secondary | Stair Climb Test | The stair climb test measures the amount of time a person ascends and descends a flight of stairs, while walking as quickly as they feel safe and comfortable to move. | Week 6 | |
Secondary | Stair Climb Test | The stair climb test measures the amount of time a person ascends and descends a flight of stairs, while walking as quickly as they feel safe and comfortable to move. | Week 9 | |
Secondary | Stair Climb Test | The stair climb test measures the amount of time a person ascends and descends a flight of stairs, while walking as quickly as they feel safe and comfortable to move. | Week 12 |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05555459 -
Performance and Safety Evaluation of Inion CompressOn Screw in Foot and Ankle Surgeries. PMCF Investigation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04235907 -
Telerehabilitation Following Ankle Fractures
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02949674 -
Ropivacaine Versus Bupivacaine as Preemptive Analgesia in Surgical Site in Ankle Fracture Patients
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02198768 -
Ankle Fracture vs Ankle Fracture-Dislocation
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05916300 -
Diagnostic Ultrasonography in Physiotherapy
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04674046 -
Deep Deltoid Ligament Integrity in Weber B Ankle Fractures - Mini-invasive Arthroscopic Evaluation.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03696199 -
Randomized Controlled Trial for Ankle Fracture Pain Control
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03259204 -
Swedish Multicenter Trial of Outpatient Prevention of Leg Clots
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03625154 -
Operative Versus Non Operative Management Outcomes of Isolated Lateral Malleolar Weber B Ankle Fractures
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03769909 -
Prevention of Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis After Acute Intraarticular Fractures
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05280639 -
Simplified Post Op Rehabilitation for Ankle and Pilon Fractures
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02967172 -
Efficacy of Multimodal Periarticular Injections in Operatively Treated Ankle Fractures
|
Phase 4 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT04768478 -
CBD for Pain Reduction and Opioid Use After Ankle and Tibia Fracture ORIF
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT05084794 -
The Results of Middle-sized Posterior Malleolus Fractures: Fixed Versus Non-fixed
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03741556 -
Prognostic Factors Following Ankle Fractures
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02481076 -
Compression in Anklefracture Treatment, The CAT-study
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05729542 -
Comparing Clinical Outcomes of Suture Button Versus Fibulink Fixation for Acute Ankle Syndesmosis Injuries
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06086223 -
Functional Outcomes Following Ankle Fracture Fixation With or Without Ankle Arthroscopy
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05389436 -
Outpatient Versus Inpatient Surgery for Ankle Fractures
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06329752 -
Sciatic Nerve Block for Ankle and Leg Fracture Manipulation in the Emergency Department
|
N/A |