Anke Fracture Clinical Trial
— RODEOOfficial title:
Routine Versus on Demand Removal of the Syndesmotic Screw
| NCT number | NCT02896998 |
| Other study ID # | METC2016_197 |
| Secondary ID | |
| Status | Completed |
| Phase | N/A |
| First received | |
| Last updated | |
| Start date | January 2017 |
| Est. completion date | May 1, 2020 |
| Verified date | July 2020 |
| Source | Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | |
| Study type | Interventional |
The objective of this trial is to demonstrate that the functional outcome of 'removal on demand' of the syndesmotic screw is non-inferior compared to routine removal of the syndesmotic screw in patients with an ankle fracture.
| Status | Completed |
| Enrollment | 197 |
| Est. completion date | May 1, 2020 |
| Est. primary completion date | May 1, 2020 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | 18 Years and older |
| Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Over 17 years of age - Placement of a metallic syndesmotic screw for an unstable ankle fracture or an isolated syndesmotic injury - Syndesmotic screw placed within two weeks of the trauma - Being in such condition that one is able to possibly undergo a second procedure Exclusion Criteria: - ISS score >15 - Injuries to the ipsi- and contralateral side which might hamper rehabilitation - Other medical conditions which hamper physical rehabilitation - Incomprehensive understanding of the Dutch language |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | Academic Medical Center | Amsterdam | Noord-Holland |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) |
Netherlands,
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Functional outcome through the Olerud-Moland score | 1 year following initial treatment | ||
| Secondary | Functional outcome through the OAFAS | 1 year following initial treatment | ||
| Secondary | Pain through the Visual Analog scale | 1 year following initial treatment | ||
| Secondary | Range of motion | 1 year following initial treatment | ||
| Secondary | Surgical complications | 1 year following initial treatment | ||
| Secondary | Quality of Life through the EQ-5D-5L | 1 year following initial treatment | ||
| Secondary | Health care consumption through the iMCQ | 1 year following initial treatment | ||
| Secondary | Loss of productivity through the iPCQ | 1 year following initial treatment |