Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02448017
Other study ID # HKCTR-1858
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date July 2012
Est. completion date December 2017

Study information

Verified date May 2018
Source The University of Hong Kong
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Herbst appliance is one of the most popular fixed functional appliances to treat orthodontic patients with small lower jaws. Since small lower jaws are reported to be one of the main reasons to induce sleep disordered breathing(SDB) of children, Herbst appliance can be used to treat SDB children. Previously no study compared the effects of Herbst appliance therapy with removable functional appliance on airway dimension, so it still remains unclear which kinds of functional appliance is more suitable for improving airway dimension. This study will assess the effect of Herbst appliance on airway dimension and compare the effects with those of twin block appliance (a popular 24 hours used removable functional appliance, and also commonly used to treat adult sleep apnea).


Description:

Sleep disordered breathing (SDB) is an important paediatric problem. It is estimated that 3.2% to 12.1% of children have habitual snoring and 0.7% to 10.3% have obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). Children OSAS is associated with a series of daytime and nighttime signs and symptoms. Nighttime symptoms include heavy snoring, restless sleep, heavy seating and enuresis, etc. Daytime symptoms include excessive daytime sleepiness and abnormal behavior such as aggressiveness and hyperactivity, etc. Untreated OSAS was reported to result in serious morbidity, such as failure to thrive, poor learning, attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder, etc.

There is an increasing concern related to sleep disordered breathing(SDB) of children by orthodontists. Since not only the tonsilar and adenoid hypertrophy is the main cause of paediatric OSA, but also craniofacial anomalies such as retrognathic mandible, narrow maxillary palatal arch and increased lower facial height can also contribute to it, orthopedic treatment such as rapid maxillary expansion (RME) and mandibular advancement device (MAD) may potentially permanently cure the children OSA. RME which is used to widen maxilla, thus increasing the nasal cavity and improving the nasal flow, has been thoroughly researched. However, only a few previous studies focused on the treatment effect of MAD for treating OSA children. These studies showed sorts of MAD such as jaw-positioning appliance, mono-block, and Herbst appliance were effective to OSA children, but it remains unclear how to choose a functional appliance, and if there is any treatment difference between removable functional appliance and fixed functional appliance for improving airway dimension.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 28
Est. completion date December 2017
Est. primary completion date October 2017
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 11 Years to 17 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

1. Class II malocclusion

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Cleft lip and palate

2. Craniofacial syndrome

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
The Herbst appliance
Orthodontic functional appliance
Twin block appliance
Orthodontic functional appliance

Locations

Country Name City State
China Faculty of Dentistry, the University of Hong Kong Hong Kong Hong Kong

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
The University of Hong Kong

Country where clinical trial is conducted

China, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary The cephalometric measurement of dimensional change of upper way following 2-phase orthodontic treatment The two-phase treatment effects of Herbst and twin-block appliances on the upper airway are to be compared based on the lateral cephalometric analysis at three time points (T0: pre-treatment; T1: following 1 year functional appliance treatment; T3: following 2 years fixed appliance treatment). The parameters of lateral cephalometric analysis include the measurements of the depth of pharynx, the size of soft palate and the position of the hyoid bone. 3 years two-phase treatment with functional appliance and fixed appliance
Secondary The three-dimensional change of upper way following 2-phase orthodontic treatment in magnetic resonance images The two-phase treatment effects of Herbst and twin-block appliances on the upper airway are to be compared based on the analyses of magnetic resonance images at three time points (T0: pre-treatment; T1: following 1 year functional appliance treatment; T3: following 2 years fixed appliance treatment).The analyses include measurements of the depth and width of pharynx, the size of soft palate and the tongue. 3 years two-phase treatment with functional appliance and fixed appliance
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05655169 - Which is Better Piezosurgery or Piezosurgery With Laser in Accelerating Orthodontic Tooth Movement N/A
Recruiting NCT06011382 - Maxillary Molar Distalization Supported by Mini-implants With the Advanced Molar Distalization Appliance (Amda®) N/A
Completed NCT04347018 - BRIUS Vs FFA Efficiency N/A
Recruiting NCT05993156 - Effects of Modified Fixed Twin Block Versus Removable Twin Block on Skeletal Class 2 Growing Patients With Mandibular Deficiency N/A