Anesthesia Clinical Trial
— DoLViOfficial title:
Video Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Double-lumen Tube Tracheal Intubation in Thoracic Surgery
Tracheal intubation (TI) is one of the fundamental and most recognized techniques in Anesthesiology, also essential in all units treating urgent pathology and critical patients. It involves advancing a tube through the vocal cords into the trachea to ventilate the patient. In thoracic surgery, it is often necessary to achieve lung isolation, ventilating only one lung while the operated lung remains collapsed and immobile. To achieve this, it is common to intubate the patient with a special tube: a double-lumen tube (DLT), larger than usual because it provides two ventilation channels, one for each lung. Tracheal intubation with a DLT presents some peculiarities: its larger size and stiffness make manipulation and orientation in the oropharynx difficult. It has a curve at its distal end (the bronchial lumen) designed to slide into the left or right main bronchus as needed. The fact that the DLT passes between the vocal cords does not ensure its proper placement and function. Therefore, DLT intubation requires practice and experience, both to slide it between the vocal cords and to position it properly. The classic technique for DLT intubation is "Direct Laryngoscopy" (DL). A traditional laryngoscope with a Macintosh blade is used to move the upper airway structures aside to allow direct visualization of the glottis. In recent years, to facilitate tracheal intubation, different videolaryngoscopes have appeared. A videolaryngoscope is a device similar to a traditional laryngoscope that allows, thanks to an image sensor located at its end, indirect visualization of the glottis on an integrated or external screen. There is strong evidence for the benefit of using a VL over traditional DL in single-tube intubation in adult patients. However, although the use of VL for DLT intubation is becoming more common, there are few studies with small sample sizes comparing VL to DL for DLT intubation, so the evidence of its advantages or disadvantages is of low quality. It could improve glottic exposure and the percentage of success on the first attempt, although there is a possibility of increased tube malposition incidence and delayed intubation. Therefore, Investigators propose a prospective, multicenter, randomized study comparing the traditional Macintosh blade laryngoscope (direct laryngoscopy) with the videolaryngoscope to facilitate orotracheal intubation with double-lumen tube in patients scheduled for thoracic surgery requiring lung isolation.
Status | Not yet recruiting |
Enrollment | 916 |
Est. completion date | June 1, 2025 |
Est. primary completion date | June 1, 2025 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 90 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Age 18 years or older. - Patients admitted to any of the participating hospitals in the study who are undergoing thoracic surgery. - Need for intubation with a double-lumen tube. Exclusion Criteria: - Pregnant or lactating women. - Individuals who do not have the capacity to understand their participation in the study. - Need for tracheal intubation with a device other than videolaryngoscopy or direct laryngoscopy (fiberoptic bronchoscope, tracheostomy...). |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Spain | Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña | A Coruña | |
Spain | Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela | Santiago de Compostela | |
Spain | Hospital Universitario La Fe de Valencia | Valencia | |
Spain | Complexo Hospitalario Universitario Vigo | Vigo |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago |
Spain,
Karczewska K, Bialka S, Smereka J, Cyran M, Nowak-Starz G, Chmielewski J, Pruc M, Wieczorek P, Peacock FW, Ladny JR, Szarpak L. Efficacy and Safety of Video-Laryngoscopy versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Double-Lumen Endotracheal Intubation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 25;10(23):5524. doi: 10.3390/jcm10235524. — View Citation
Kim YS, Song J, Lim BG, Lee IO, Won YJ. Different classes of videoscopes and direct laryngoscopes for double-lumen tube intubation in thoracic surgery: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2020 Aug 28;15(8):e0238060. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238060. eCollection 2020. — View Citation
Liu TT, Li L, Wan L, Zhang CH, Yao WL. Videolaryngoscopy vs. Macintosh laryngoscopy for double-lumen tube intubation in thoracic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2018 Aug;73(8):997-1007. doi: 10.1111/anae.14226. Epub 2018 Feb 6. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | Number of laryngoscopy attempts | Number of laryngoscopy attempts | Duration of procedure (minutes) | |
Other | Number of attempts to cannulate the trachea with an endotracheal tube | Number of attempts to cannulate the trachea with an endotracheal tube | Duration of procedure (minutes) | |
Other | Duration of laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation | The interval (in seconds) between the first insertion of a laryngoscope blade into the mouth and the final placement of a double lumen tube in the trachea. | Duration of procedure (minutes) | |
Other | Reason for failure to intubate on the first attempt | Reason for failure among those who did not meet the primary outcome (successful intubation on the first attempt):
Inadequate view of the larynx Inability to intubate the trachea with an endotracheal tube Inability to cannulate the trachea with a bougie Attempt aborted due to change in patient condition (e.g., worsening hypoxemia, hypotension, bradycardia, vomiting, bleeding) Technical failure of the laryngoscope (e.g., battery, light source, camera, screen) Other |
Duration of procedure (minutes) | |
Other | Operator-assessed difficulty of intubation | Operator-assessed difficulty of intubation
without difficulty mild difficulty moderate difficulty severe difficulty |
Duration of procedure (minutes) | |
Other | Modified Cormack-Lehane grade of glottic view | Modified Cormack-Lehane grade of glottic view:
I: full view of the glottis IIa: partial view of the glottis IIb: arytenoid or posterior part of the vocal cords just visible III: only epiglottis visible IV: neither glottis nor epiglottis visible Cormack-Lehane grade of glottic view |
Duration of procedure (minutes) | |
Other | Need for additional airway equipment | Airway equipment: bougie, stylet, other videolaryngoscope, others. | Duration of procedure (minutes) | |
Other | Need to change the device for intubation | Need to replace by another videolaryngoscope, a different angled blade, requirement for a fiberoptic bronchoscope...). | Duration of procedure (minutes) | |
Other | Use of external laryngeal pressure | External laryngeal pressure | Duration of procedure (minutes) | |
Other | Malposition of the double lumen endotracheal tube | Malposition of the double lumen endotracheal tube | Duration of procedure (minutes) | |
Other | Incidence of Dysphonia, hoarseness, or sore throat in the first 24 hours. | Incidence of Dysphonia, hoarseness, or sore throat in the first 24 hours. | 24 hours after intubation | |
Primary | Number of intubations with successful intubation on the first attempt | The primary outcome is defined as placement of a double lumen tube in the trachea with a single insertion of a videolaryngoscope blade into the mouth and either a single insertion of a double lumen tube into the mouth. | Duration of procedure (minutes) | |
Secondary | Successful intubation | Successful placement of a double lumen tube in the trachea | Duration of procedure (minutes) | |
Secondary | Incidence of "easy intubation" | Easy intubation is defined as a patient with Cormack-Lehane I-II glottic view and intubation on the first attempt. | Duration of procedure (minutes) |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04580030 -
Tricuapid Annular Plane Sistolic Excursion Before General Anesthesia Can Predict Hypotension After Induction
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04279054 -
Decreased Neuraxial Morphine After Cesarean Delivery
|
Early Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT03640442 -
Modified Ramped Position for Intubation of Obese Females.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04099693 -
A Prospective Randomized Study of General Anesthesia Versus Anesthetist Administered Sedation for ERCP
|
||
Terminated |
NCT02481999 -
Pre- and Postoperative EEG-Monitoring for Children Aged From 0,5 to 8 Years
|
||
Completed |
NCT04235894 -
An Observer Rating Scale of Facial Expression Can Predict Dreaming in Propofol Anesthesia
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05525104 -
The Effect of DSA on Recovery of Anaesthesia in Children (Het Effect Van DSA op Het Herstel na Anesthesie Bij Kinderen).
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05024084 -
Desflurane and Sevoflurane Minimal Flow Anesthesia on Recovery and Anesthetic Depth
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT04204785 -
Noise in the OR at Induction: Patient and Anesthesiologists Perceptions
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03277872 -
NoL, HR and MABP Responses to Tracheal Intubation Performed With MAC Blade Versus Glidescope
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT03940651 -
Cardiac and Renal Biomarkers in Arthroplasty Surgery
|
Phase 4 | |
Terminated |
NCT02529696 -
Measuring Sedation in the Intensive Care Unit Using Wireless Accelerometers
|
||
Completed |
NCT05346588 -
THRIVE Feasibility Trial
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT03704285 -
Development of pk/pd Model of Propofol in Patients With Severe Burns
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05259787 -
EP Intravenous Anesthesia in Hysteroscopy
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02894996 -
Does the Response to a Mini-fluid Challenge of 3ml/kg in 2 Minutes Predict Fluid Responsiveness for Pediatric Patient?
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05386082 -
Anesthesia Core Quality Metrics Consensus Delphi Study
|
||
Terminated |
NCT03567928 -
Laryngeal Mask in Upper Gastrointestinal Procedures
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06074471 -
Motor Sparing Supraclavicular Block
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04163848 -
CARbon Impact of aNesthesic Gas
|