Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05386082 |
Other study ID # |
H22-00519 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
September 26, 2022 |
Est. completion date |
November 1, 2023 |
Study information
Verified date |
February 2024 |
Source |
University of British Columbia |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Observational
|
Clinical Trial Summary
To develop a ranked list of up to 20 metrics, which can be used to evaluate the quality of
anesthesia, perioperative care, and acute pain management for adult inpatient non-cardiac
surgical patients for use in quality improvement and quality assurance, research, and
continuing medical education in the Canadian care context.
Description:
Background: Improving anesthesiology care and perioperative outcomes is a growing field
encompassing quality improvement and quality assurance, research, and continuing medical
education. Multiple consensus initiatives have standardized perioperative endpoints. However,
no standard set of metrics exist to evaluate the quality of Canadian anesthesiology care
delivery.
Objective: Develop a ranked list of up to 20 metrics, which can be used to evaluate the
quality of anesthesia, perioperative care, and acute pain management for adult inpatient
non-cardiac surgical patients for use in quality improvement and quality assurance, research,
and continuing medical education in the Canadian care context.
Methods: First, the steering committee will conduct a scoping review of the literature to
identify candidate metrics, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and
Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and Joanna Briggs Institute
methodology for scoping reviews. Metrics will include patient-reported outcome and
patient-reported experience measures, quality and safety indicators, process metrics, and
Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society recommended practice standards. The search strategy will
include English-language articles published or in use within the past seven years
(2015/Jan-2022/March) in 1) MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database of
Systematic Reviews, 2) grey literature, including guidelines, and 3) existing evaluation
metrics used by Canadian departments for quality assurance and improvement. Screening and
data extraction will be performed by two independent reviewers using Covidence.
Next, following approval from the Research Ethics Board and with written informed consent
from participants, a multidisciplinary panel of anesthesiologists, people with lived surgical
experience (patients, caregivers), surgeons, nurses, internal medicine and family physicians,
hospital administrators, and researchers will iteratively review the list of candidate
metrics using a modified Delphi process. Independent voting, using surveys over three rounds,
will be used to identify the most important metrics to define the quality of anesthesia,
perioperative care, and acute pain management. Additional cycles may be performed if
required.