Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03677856
Other study ID # RG_18-0108
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date January 8, 2019
Est. completion date October 1, 2022

Study information

Verified date September 2019
Source University of Birmingham
Contact Hugh Jarrett, MSc
Phone 00 44 121 415 9134
Email h.jarrett@bham.ac.uk
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

An estimated 7200 thoracotomies (surgical incision into the chest wall) are performed annually in the UK, most commonly to treat lung cancer. It is considered one of the most painful surgical procedures due to tissue, muscle and nerve damage from the incision, and as the wound heals. The normal breathing motion and nerve injury caused during surgery can result in a high risk of persistent pain for months after surgery. Chronic post-thoracotomy pain (CPTP) is defined as pain that recurs or persists at least two months following the surgery and can occur in up to half of these patients.

There are two commonly used for pain control during thoracotomy: Thoracic Epidural Block (TEB) blocks nerves on both sides of the chest at the spinal cord. It reduces painful nerve signals but may not abolish them completely. Para Vertebral Blockade is done only on the side of surgery and may completely block painful nerve signals from reaching the spinal cord. This total blockade of nerve signals could decrease the likelihood of developing chronic pain and could be uniquely effective in preventing long-term pain.

Over a period of 30 months this trial will be attempting to approach all patients undergoing a thoracotomy at approximately 20 UK hospitals to see if they wish to participate, and to look at the reasons they may not want to participate. We will follow up each participant for a maximum of a year following their surgery.

There is a qualitative intervention embedded within this study to support recruitment.


Description:

At the present time, both thoracic epidural block (TEB) and paravertebral blockade (PVB) are routinely used in the UK to provide pain relief for patients undergoing elective open thoracotomy. TEB has long been regarded as the 'gold standard' technique of pain relief for thoracotomy but this has recently been challenged from an overview of the literature on trends and new evidence in the management of acute and chronic post-thoracotomy pain.

In TOPIC 2 the interventional arm will be peri-operative (at or around the time of surgery) pain relief using PVB and the comparator arm will be peri-operative pain relief using TEB. The only pre-operative change to the patient pathway in TOPIC 2 is that the patient will be approached during pre-operative assessment at least 24 hours prior to surgery.

Post-operatively patients will receive analgesia in line with current practice. The trial's hypothesis is that in adult patients undergoing elective open thoracotomy, the use of paravertebral blockade for pain relief at or around the time of surgery reduces both the number of people reporting chronic pain and the persistence of chronic pain at six months by at least 10%, compared with the use of thoracic epidural block. To detect this difference a total of 1026 patients will be recruited from approximately 20 UK hospitals.

Interim analyses of safety and efficacy for presentation to the independent DMC will take place during the study. The committee will meet prior to study commencement to agree the manner and timing of such analyses but this is likely to include the analysis of the primary and major secondary outcomes and full assessment of safety (SAEs) at least at annual intervals. Criteria for stopping or modifying the study based on this information will be ratified by the DMC, but there is also an embedded pilot phase which sets out criteria for assessing whether sufficient progress is made during the first 12 months of recruitment. Failure to open enough sites to recruitment or recruit enough patients from those sites, may be sufficient reason to terminate the trial, or at least re-design some of it to ease these problems.

A randomised controlled trial design has been chosen since this is the acknowledged "gold standard" for evidence based medicine and, because only the patients themselves can say how much pain they are in, patient reported outcomes are appropriate in answering the trial question. Because of the nature of the procedure it is not possible to conceal the surgical team performing the procedure from the allocation but they will not know in advance which of the allocated treatments will be received. There is no reason to believe that patients will have any preconceptions regarding the levels of chronic pain they will experience so the chance of bias is low in this regard.

TOPIC 2 has been designed as a pragmatic trial which collates data during the hospital admission for thoracotomy then, by telephone interview and postal questionnaire at 3, 6 and 12 months. This schedule of events as well as both the type and amount of data collected has been created with substantial input from 2 patient/public representatives.

Since the track record of recruitment to trials involving surgery is not as good as in other areas of medicine, the trial has embedded a qualitative component which will specifically look at the consent process and the reasons for patients either entering or not entering the trial. Patients will therefore initially be asked to consent to the conversation introducing the trial being recorded, and to participate in the main trial. They can choose to participate in just the interview process (conducted in the clinic), just the main trial, neither, or both.

The trial documentation has been prepared in advance of submission to ethics and recruitment is estimated to start in the final quarter of 2018, for 30 months. The first 12 months of recruitment will form an internal pilot phase during which the feasibility of the overall trial will be assessed. Although the primary outcome requires only 6 months followup, patients will be followed up for year to provide a further estimate of how long any differences in pain levels lasts. It will take approximately a further 6 months to analyse the data prior to publication.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 1026
Est. completion date October 1, 2022
Est. primary completion date January 8, 2022
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Aged =18 years

- Elective open thoracotomy

- Able to provide written informed consent

- Willingness to complete study questionnaires up until 12 months post randomisation

Exclusion Criteria:

- Contraindication to TEB or PVB e.g. known allergy to local anaesthetics; infection near the proposed puncture site; coagulation disorders, thoracic spine disorders

- Surgery for chest wall pathology on the side of surgery

- Previous thoracotomy

- Median sternotomy within 90 days

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Paravertebral blockade
Type of anaesthesia
Thoracic epidural block
Type of anaesthesia

Locations

Country Name City State
United Kingdom Heartlands Hospital Birmingham West Midlands

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University of Birmingham

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United Kingdom, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Incidence of chronic pain: incidence = score > 40 on visual analogue score Patient reported pain lasting at least 3 months as measured by visual analogue score 6 months post trial thoracotomy
Secondary Complications of regional anaesthesia Complications of regional anaesthesia are protocol-defined 3, 6 and 12 months post randomisation
Secondary Incidence of surgical complications as classified by the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons Until discharge from hospital post randomisation eg a maximum of 30 days
Secondary Incidence of surgical complications as classified by the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons 3, 6 and 12 months post randomisation
Secondary Incidence of Major Post-operative pulmonary complications as classified by StEP Core Outcome Measures in Perioperative and Anaesthetic Care Until discharge from hospital post randomisation eg a maximum of 30 days
Secondary Incidence of Major Post-operative pulmonary complications as classified by StEP Core Outcome Measures in Perioperative and Anaesthetic Care 3, 6 and 12 months post randomisation
Secondary Incidence of critical care admission Any admission to critical care extracted from hospital records 3, 6 and 12 months post randomisation
Secondary Mortality All deaths due to all causes 3, 6 and 12 months post randomisation
Secondary Analgesic use all forms of analgesic use for trial-related pain as reported by patient 3, 6 and 12 months post randomisation
Secondary Acute pain Patient reported worst chest pain on visual analogue scale (0-10) with 10 being the worst Until discharge from hospital post randomisation eg a maximum of 30 days
Secondary Acute pain Patient reported via Brief Pain Inventory Interference score (0-10, higher = worse) Until discharge from hospital post randomisation eg a maximum of 30 days
Secondary Acute pain Patient reported worst chest pain via Short Form McGill Pain Score (0-10 higher = worse score) Until discharge from hospital post randomisation eg a maximum of 30 days
Secondary Acute pain Patient reported worst chest pain on visual analogue scale (0-10) with 10 being the worst 3, 6 and 12 months post randomisation
Secondary Acute pain Patient reported worst chest pain via Brief Pain Inventory Interference Score (0-10 higher = worse score) 3, 6 and 12 months post randomisation
Secondary Acute pain Patient reported worst chest via Short Form McGill Pain Score (0-10 higher = worse score) 3, 6 and 12 months post randomisation
Secondary Health resource use Targeted collection of health resource use data from hospital records Until discharge from hospital post randomisation eg a maximum of 30 days
Secondary Health resource use Targeted collection of health resource use data from hospital records 3, 6 and 12 months post randomisation
Secondary General health-related quality of life Index Score Patient reported using EQ-5D-5L questionnaire Index Score (1.0 = best outcome) 3, 6 and 12 months post randomisation
Secondary General health-related quality of life Thermometer Score Patient reported using EQ-5D-5L questionnaire Thermometer Score (0-100, 100 = best outcome) 3, 6 and 12 months post randomisation
Secondary General health-related quality of life Patient reported using Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score (0-21, lower = better) Until discharge from hospital post randomisation eg a maximum of 30 days
Secondary General health-related quality of life Patient reported using Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score (0-21, lower = better) 3, 6 and 12 months post randomisation
Secondary Patient Satisfaction with care provided Patient reported on Likert scale (Very dissatisfied/ Dissatisfied/ Satisfied/ Very satisfied) Until discharge from hospital post randomisation eg a maximum of 30 days
Secondary Patient Satisfaction with care provided Patient reported on Likert scale (Very dissatisfied/ Dissatisfied/ Satisfied/ Very satisfied) 3, 6 and 12 months post randomisation
Secondary Incidence of Serious Adverse Events Protocol-defined events meeting the accepted trial definition of "serious" 3, and 6 months post randomisation
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT04279054 - Decreased Neuraxial Morphine After Cesarean Delivery Early Phase 1
Active, not recruiting NCT04580030 - Tricuapid Annular Plane Sistolic Excursion Before General Anesthesia Can Predict Hypotension After Induction
Completed NCT03640442 - Modified Ramped Position for Intubation of Obese Females. N/A
Recruiting NCT04099693 - A Prospective Randomized Study of General Anesthesia Versus Anesthetist Administered Sedation for ERCP
Terminated NCT02481999 - Pre- and Postoperative EEG-Monitoring for Children Aged From 0,5 to 8 Years
Completed NCT04235894 - An Observer Rating Scale of Facial Expression Can Predict Dreaming in Propofol Anesthesia
Recruiting NCT05525104 - The Effect of DSA on Recovery of Anaesthesia in Children (Het Effect Van DSA op Het Herstel na Anesthesie Bij Kinderen). N/A
Recruiting NCT05024084 - Desflurane and Sevoflurane Minimal Flow Anesthesia on Recovery and Anesthetic Depth Phase 4
Completed NCT04204785 - Noise in the OR at Induction: Patient and Anesthesiologists Perceptions N/A
Completed NCT03277872 - NoL, HR and MABP Responses to Tracheal Intubation Performed With MAC Blade Versus Glidescope N/A
Terminated NCT03940651 - Cardiac and Renal Biomarkers in Arthroplasty Surgery Phase 4
Terminated NCT02529696 - Measuring Sedation in the Intensive Care Unit Using Wireless Accelerometers
Completed NCT05346588 - THRIVE Feasibility Trial Phase 3
Terminated NCT03704285 - Development of pk/pd Model of Propofol in Patients With Severe Burns
Recruiting NCT05259787 - EP Intravenous Anesthesia in Hysteroscopy Phase 4
Completed NCT02894996 - Does the Response to a Mini-fluid Challenge of 3ml/kg in 2 Minutes Predict Fluid Responsiveness for Pediatric Patient? N/A
Completed NCT05386082 - Anesthesia Core Quality Metrics Consensus Delphi Study
Terminated NCT03567928 - Laryngeal Mask in Upper Gastrointestinal Procedures N/A
Recruiting NCT06074471 - Motor Sparing Supraclavicular Block N/A
Completed NCT04163848 - CARbon Impact of aNesthesic Gas