Anesthesia Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Prospective, Randomized Comparison Between Single and Double Injection Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block
The investigators conducted this prospective, randomized, observer-blinded, non-inferiority trial to compare single perivascular injection to double injection (musculocutaneous nerve and perivascular injection) US guided axillary brachial plexus block.
Status | Not yet recruiting |
Enrollment | 320 |
Est. completion date | July 2015 |
Est. primary completion date | June 2015 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 18 Years to 75 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - 18-75 year of age, ASA physical status I-III, BMI 25 to 35 Kg/m2 Exclusion Criteria: - non consents patients, any contraindication to brachial plexus anesthesia (local anesthetic allergy, local infection and coagulopathy), preexisting neuropathy, hepatic or renal failure, pregnancy and surgery in the axillary region. |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
n/a |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Institut Kassab d'Orthopédie |
Ay S, Akinci M, Sayin M, Bektas U, Tekdemir I, Elhan A. The axillary sheath and single-injection axillary block. Clin Anat. 2007 Jan;20(1):57-63. — View Citation
Kjelstrup T, Hol PK, Courivaud F, Smith HJ, Røkkum M, Klaastad Ø. MRI of axillary brachial plexus blocks: a randomised controlled study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2014 Nov;31(11):611-9. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000122. — View Citation
Tran DQ, Pham K, Dugani S, Finlayson RJ. A prospective, randomized comparison between double-, triple-, and quadruple-injection ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012 May-Jun;37(3):248-53. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318246 — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | paresthesia and numbness | Paresthesia and numbness were monitored while performing the block, and up to 48 hours postoperatively. | up to 48 hours postoperatively | Yes |
Other | blood vessel puncture | Will be monitored while performing the block, with an expected average time of 10 minutes | 10 minutes | Yes |
Primary | Success rate | the percentage of patients who successfully complete surgery without any additional anesthesia. Will be assessed at the end of the surgery with an expected average time of 2 hours. | 2 hours after the block performance | No |
Primary | total anesthesia-related time | The total anesthesia-related time is the sum of performance and onset time (see below). | <30 minutes after the block performance | No |
Secondary | imaging time | The imaging time is defined as the time interval between contact of the US probe with the patient and the acquisition of a satisfactory image of the axillary artery, musculocutaneous nerve and the ulnar nerve. Will be assessed at the end of the imaging process with an an expected average time of 5 minutes. | 5 minutes | No |
Secondary | needling time | The needling time is defined as the time interval between the start of the skin weal and the end of LA injection. Will be assessed at the end of local anesthetic injection with an an expected average time of 5 minutes. | 5 minutes | No |
Secondary | number of needle passes | The initial needle insertion will count as first pass. Any subsequent needle advancement that will be preceded by a retraction of at least 10mm will count for an extra pass. Thus, the number of needle passes is defined as the sum of the first and the extra needle passes. Will be assessed at the end of local anesthetic injection with an an expected average time of 5 minutes. | 5 minutes | No |
Secondary | Performance time | The performance time is defined as the time interval between the first contact of the US probe with the skin and the end of local anesthetic injection. Thus performance time is the sum of the imaging and needling times. Will be assessed at the end of local anesthetic injection with an an expected average time of 10 minutes. | 10 minutes | No |
Secondary | Onset time | The onset time is defined as the time required to obtain a sensorimotor composite score of 14 points (see below). | every 5 minutes until 30 minutes after the end of the block performance | No |
Secondary | Sensory blockade | Sensory blockade of the musculocutaneous, median, radial and ulnar nerves will be assessed every 5 minutes until 30 minutes and will be graded according to a 3 point scale using a cold test:0= no block, 1= analgesia (patient can feel touch but not the cold), 2=anesthesia (patient can not feel touch and cold). Sensory blockade of the musculocutaneous, median, radial and ulnar nerves will be assessed on the lateral side of the forearm, the palmar part of the thumb, the lateral part of the dorsum of the hand and the volar side of the fifth finger, respectively. | every 5 minutes until 30 minutes after the end of the block performance | No |
Secondary | Motor blockade | Motor blockade will be assessed every 5 minutes until 30 minutes and will be graded on a 3 point scale: 0 = no block; 1 = paresis; 2 = paralysis. Motor blockade of the musculocutaneous, radial, median and ulnar nerves will be evaluated by elbow flexion, wrist extension, thumb opposition, thumb abduction, respectively. | every 5 minutes until 30 minutes after the end of the block performance | No |
Secondary | Composite score | The sensorimotor composite score is defined as the sum of the score of each assessed nerve. Overall the maximal sensorimotor composite score will be 16 points. Patient is considered ready for surgery when a minimal composite score of 14 points is achieved, provided the sensory block score was equal or superior to 7 out 8 points. | every 5 minutes until 30 minutes after the end of the block performance | No |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04279054 -
Decreased Neuraxial Morphine After Cesarean Delivery
|
Early Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04580030 -
Tricuapid Annular Plane Sistolic Excursion Before General Anesthesia Can Predict Hypotension After Induction
|
||
Completed |
NCT03640442 -
Modified Ramped Position for Intubation of Obese Females.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04099693 -
A Prospective Randomized Study of General Anesthesia Versus Anesthetist Administered Sedation for ERCP
|
||
Terminated |
NCT02481999 -
Pre- and Postoperative EEG-Monitoring for Children Aged From 0,5 to 8 Years
|
||
Completed |
NCT04235894 -
An Observer Rating Scale of Facial Expression Can Predict Dreaming in Propofol Anesthesia
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05525104 -
The Effect of DSA on Recovery of Anaesthesia in Children (Het Effect Van DSA op Het Herstel na Anesthesie Bij Kinderen).
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05024084 -
Desflurane and Sevoflurane Minimal Flow Anesthesia on Recovery and Anesthetic Depth
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT04204785 -
Noise in the OR at Induction: Patient and Anesthesiologists Perceptions
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03277872 -
NoL, HR and MABP Responses to Tracheal Intubation Performed With MAC Blade Versus Glidescope
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT03940651 -
Cardiac and Renal Biomarkers in Arthroplasty Surgery
|
Phase 4 | |
Terminated |
NCT02529696 -
Measuring Sedation in the Intensive Care Unit Using Wireless Accelerometers
|
||
Completed |
NCT05346588 -
THRIVE Feasibility Trial
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT03704285 -
Development of pk/pd Model of Propofol in Patients With Severe Burns
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05259787 -
EP Intravenous Anesthesia in Hysteroscopy
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02894996 -
Does the Response to a Mini-fluid Challenge of 3ml/kg in 2 Minutes Predict Fluid Responsiveness for Pediatric Patient?
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05386082 -
Anesthesia Core Quality Metrics Consensus Delphi Study
|
||
Terminated |
NCT03567928 -
Laryngeal Mask in Upper Gastrointestinal Procedures
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06074471 -
Motor Sparing Supraclavicular Block
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04163848 -
CARbon Impact of aNesthesic Gas
|