Anesthesia, Spinal Clinical Trial
Official title:
Spinal Ropivacaine for Cesarean Delivery: A Comparison of Commonly Hyperbaric and Marginally Hyperbaric Solutions
BACKGROUND: One previous study has confirmed that the marginally hyperbaric solutions of
bupivacaine can maintain good quality of anesthesia and get a more steadily hemodynamic
status than commonly hyperbaric solutions, some authors confirmed the plain ropivacaine for
cesarean section have a higher failure rate and commonly hyperbaric solutions of ropivacaine
have a higher incidence of side reaction. It is unclear what the efficacy of spinal
marginally hyperbaric ropivacaine for elective cesarean delivery.We hypothesized that the
marginally hyperbaric ropivacaine will get a similar efficacy to commonly hyperbaric
solutions but a more steadily hemodynamic status.
OBJECTIVE In this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study, Investigator will compare
the clinical efficacy and adverse effect of spinal anesthesia with commonly hyperbaric and
marginally hyperbaric ropivacaine for elective cesarean delivery.
Main outcome measures: The maximum cephalad sensory block level; the change of continuous
cerebral oxygen desaturation (ScO2) over time; the incidence of hypotension and nausea and
vomiting; the change of invasive arterial pressure; the consumption of ephedrine; the
incidence of shivering; the onset time to T8 dermatome; the quality of anesthesia (efficacy
of motor block and sensory block)
INTRODUCTION:
One previous study has confirmed that the marginally hyperbaric solutions of bupivacaine can
maintain good quality of anesthesia and get a more steadily hemodynamic status than commonly
hyperbaric solutions, some authors confirmed the plain ropivacaine for cesarean section have
a higher failure rate and commonly hyperbaric solutions of ropivacaine have a higher
incidence of side reaction such as hypotension. It is unclear what the efficacy of spinal
marginally hyperbaric ropivacaine for elective cesarean delivery.The investigator of this
study hypothesized that the marginally hyperbaric ropivacaine would get a similar efficacy
to commonly hyperbaric solutions but a more steadily hemodynamic status.In this prospective,
randomized, double-blinded study, Investigator will compare the clinical efficacy and
adverse effect of spinal anesthesia with commonly hyperbaric and marginally hyperbaric
ropivacaine for elective cesarean delivery.
Ethical approval for this clinical trial (Ethical Committee No.) was provided by the Ethics
Committee of Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (Qingdao), Qingdao, China on 1 February
2016. Informed written consent will be obtained from all patients. Investigator expected to
recruit 120 Pregnant women who will scheduled for elective cesarean section and meet the
inclusion criteria.
A computer-generated random number sequence will be used for group allocation. To ensure the
study will be double blinded, the anesthesiologist who will administer the anesthesia will
take no other part in the study, whilst another anesthesiologist blind to the allocation
will collected intraoperative and postoperative data. The patients would be unaware of the
treatment allocation. Women will be randomised into two groups: the commonly hyperbaric
group (CH) will receive ropivacaine solution with 8.3% glucose; group marginally hyperbaric
group (MH) will receive ropivacaine solution with 0.83% glucose; Density will be determined
by using a digital density meter (DMA4500M; Anton Paar GmbH, Graz, Austria) at 37°C.Fifteen
minutes prior to administration of anesthesia, the ropivacaine solution will be prepared by
one nurse who is blind to the patient allocation.Commomly hyperbaric ropivacaine solutions
will be made of 0.75% ropivacaine + 50% glucose + isotonic saline and Marginally hyperbaric
solutions will be made of 0.75% ropivacaine +5% glucose + isotonic saline. The doses of
ropivacaine and the volume of spinal solution will be same and only the density of the
solution will be different.
When the patient arrived at the operating room, an IV cannula will be inserted in one
forearm. Standard monitoring with electrocardiography and pulse oximetry and cerebral oxygen
saturation(ScO2) and invasive blood pressure (IBP) will be attached.
During the operation, the room temperature will be kept at 24°C. The body temperature of
each patient will be maintained by an electric warming blanket and infusion heating device.
The data of systolic pressure and ScO2 wil be recorded at 5-6 second intervals on the
device's accessory disk drive for later analysis. To establish a baseline for blood pressure
and ScO2. No prehydration will be given. Lactated Ringers' solution at 0.4 ml kg-1 min-1
will be infused after anesthesia. Supplemental oxygen is planned to be administered in case
SpO2 values would be below 91%.
The combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) would be performed in the lateral position at
the intervertebral space between L3 and L4. Then, spinal solution will be injected
intrathecalley after CSF releas. The epidural catheter will be inserted. The patient will be
immediately placed in a supine position with 15° left tilt. Completion of the spinal
injection would be considered as time zero. The sensory block will be determined by pinprick
along both sides of the midclavicular line at 2 min intervals post injection. The sensory
block had not reached T8 before surgery, or there was moderate pain during the skin
incision, spinal anesthesia would be considered to have failed.
The efficacy of anesthesia would be evaluated using three criteria: lower limb motor block,
muscle relaxation and pain during skin incision and abdominal exploration.
To treat intraoperative hypotension, 6mg ephedrine will be injected followed by 3 mg every 2
min until the blood pressure was restored to normal. Instances of nausea, vomiting,
shivering and pruritus will be also recorded.
After delivery, Apgar scores will be assessed at 1 and 5 min by the attending pediatrician.
On the basis of the results of a pilot study, 40 patients in each group were needed to
compare a two-segment difference in the upper sensory level and 30 % difference in the
incidence of hypotension at a significance level of P less than 0.05 with 80% power.
However, We expect to enroll 120 patients to get a more precise result.
For IBP and ScO2 the median value of the sliding averages of the 30-second period before
spinal induction will be used as the baseline value for the figures and statistical
analyses. Time 0 for hemodynamic analyses will be defined as the end of spinal injection.
This two variables analyses will be run for the first 15 minutes, which almost equaled to
the interval from induction of spinal anesthesia to delivery.
SPSS 16.0 will be used for data analysis. T-test would be used to assess the difference in
sensory block level amongst the groups, The linear mixed model to analyze the continuous
changes in systolic pressure and ScO2 over time. X2 test for trends would be used to test
the association between adverse effects of anesthesia and the groups. In all cases, a P
value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03324984 -
1% Chloroprocaine(PF) vs. Bupivacaine Spinals
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03399019 -
Bispectral Index(BIS) on Depth of Sedation With Dexmedetomidine, Propofol and Midazolam During Spinal Anesthesia
|
N/A | |
Suspended |
NCT03967288 -
Comparison of Clorotekal and Bupivacaine for Short Obstetric Surgery
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03316352 -
Ultrasound-assisted Versus Conventional Landmark-guided Paramedian Spinal Anesthesia in Elderly Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04092478 -
'' Abdominal Crunch Positions With the Others in Terms of Interspinous Distance in Adult Patients ''
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04128410 -
A Study on Central Transport Characteristics of Flurbiprofen Axetil in Elderly Patients
|
||
Completed |
NCT02961842 -
Combined Colloid Preload And Crystalloid Coload Versus Crystalloid Coload During Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04050059 -
Comparison of Two Analgesic Pretreatment Techniques Before Spinal Needle Insertion for Pain Reduction and Maternal Satisfaction Level Assessment in Women Undergoing LSCS.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02833376 -
Alcohol 70% Versus Chlorhexidine 0.5% in the Spinal Anesthesia Skin Antissepsis
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06427382 -
Prediction of Hypotension Using Perfusion Index Following Spinal Anesthesia
|
||
Completed |
NCT03105115 -
Effect of Intrathecal Fentanyl on Spinal Anesthesia During Dexmedetomidine Infusion
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT04996420 -
Goal Directed Fluid Therapy Versus Liberal Fluid Regimen in Primary Elective Hip Artrhoplasty
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06418308 -
Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine vs Epinephrine
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03929874 -
Ultrasound Image Study for Ultrasound-assisted Paramedian Spinal Anesthesia
|
||
Completed |
NCT05379777 -
Effective Dose of Remimazolam for Sedation in Patients Undergoing Lower Extremity Surgery Under Spinal Anesthesia
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03959644 -
Failure Rate in Spinal Blocks and Determination of Related Factors
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03497364 -
Combined Spinal-epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Section Without Prophylactical Prehydration and Vasopressors
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03075488 -
Ultrasound Prescan vs Conventional Landmark-guided Technique in Spinal Anesthesia in Orthopedic Obese Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06375863 -
QT Changes in Geriatric Patients: a Comparison of Spinal and General Anesthesia
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02737813 -
Cardiac Output Changes During Hyperbaric and Isobaric Bupivacaine in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section
|
Phase 4 |