Anesthesia, Epidural Clinical Trial
Official title:
Randomised, Prospective, Single-blind, Controlled Multicenter Study on the Safety of Two Epidural Catheters in Patients Undergoing Surgery Under Thoracic Epidural Anaesthesia
Primary Objective: The primary objective is to demonstrate that the safety of Perifix New is
non-inferior to using Perifix Standard when applied for thoracic epidural anaesthesia.
Primary Endpoint: Incidence of spontaneous paraesthesia during catheter insertion
Secondary Objectives: The secondary objectives are to determine the safety and performance
of the investigational product: frequency of inadvertent vascular cannulation, difficulties
involved in insertion and removal of the catheter, other safety features and data for the
evaluation of handling characteristics.
Title: Randomised, prospective, single-blind, controlled, study on the safety of two
epidural catheters in patients undergoing surgery under thoracic epidural anaesthesia
Investigational Product: Perifix Epidural Anaesthesia Catheter
Test Product: Perifix New
Reference Product: Perifix Standard
Number of Sites and Countries: 1 site in The Netherlands
Indication: Thoracic epidural anaesthesia
Study Design: Randomised, prospective, single-blind, controlled study in 1 study center,
phase IV
Perifix New and Perifix Standard meet all the appropriate provisions of the relevant
legislation implementing European Directives (both have CE-marking).
Study Duration: 2 year duration
Study Start: March-April 2005
Sample Size: n = 2*70 patients
Epidural anaesthesia is a central neuraxial block technique with many applications.
Improvements in equipment, drugs and technique have made it a popular and versatile
anaesthetic technique, with applications in surgery, obstetrics and pain control. Both
single injection and catheter techniques can be used. Its versatility means it can be used
as an anaesthetic, as an analgesic adjuvant to general anaesthesia, and for postoperative
analgesia in procedures involving the lower limbs, perineum, pelvis, abdomen and thorax.
Although epidural anaesthesia is a safe technique, during the insertion of epidural
catheters several side effects may occur, including transient paraesthesia and inadvertent
vascular cannulation.
Reported incidences for paraesthesia vary widely between about 0.2% and 50% in different
articles, depending on the catheter (catheter material, soft-tipped or firm-tipped
catheter), the applied technique (lumbar or thoracic epidural anaesthesia, depth of catheter
insertion), the approach (midline or paramedian) and the included patients (obstetrical or
non-obstetrical). Paraesthesias are not supposed to lead to permanent neurological sequelae,
but are unpleasant and perturbing sensations for the patient.
Besides inadvertent intrathecal location of the catheter, further problems include technical
difficulties during threading or removal of the catheter. Here, the catheter shaft material
seems to be the crucial factor for the incidence of problems.
Based upon years of experience, a wide range of epidural catheters were created, among them
the Perifix catheter of B. Braun. Common features are their high tensile strength and
stretch resistance, excellent shaft stability with easy visualisation of blood or spinal
fluid due to the crystal clear material, no risk of forming loops or knots, and softening of
catheter within a few hours due to water absorption of the polyamide material.
Recently, B. Braun Melsungen AG has developed a new generation of Perifix epidural
catheters, which are already CE-labeled. These new catheters are different in their
composition compared to the current Perifix Standard catheter with regard to the catheter
material and tip configuration. They have an outer poly-urethane liner and an inner
polyamide body. Experimental tests have shown that the positive features (e.g. pushability,
kink resistance, gliding, withdrawal) of the Perifix Standard catheter can be maintained.
Due to the polyurethane outer layer, the catheter gets softer when reaching body temperature
immediately upon insertion. Based on this, it is expected that paraesthesias during catheter
injection can be reduced by at least 20%.
;
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Subject), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05642234 -
Comparison of Skin - Epidural and Intervertebral Distances in Sitting and Rider Position
|
||
Completed |
NCT02563821 -
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus Versus Continuous Epidural Infusion for Third Trimester Medical Termination of Pregnancy Analgesia : a Randomized Study. (PCEA-IMG)
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00223002 -
Chlorhexidine Versus Povidone-Iodine for Prevention of Epidural Needle Contamination in the Parturient
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02833376 -
Alcohol 70% Versus Chlorhexidine 0.5% in the Spinal Anesthesia Skin Antissepsis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02801409 -
Epidural Anesthesia-analgesia and Long-term Survival After Lung Cancer Surgery
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02785081 -
Thoracic Epidural Depth in Children Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Magnetic Resonance Imaging
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01260051 -
Intrapartum Epidural Fentanyl/Bupivacaine Analgesia, Infant Feeding Behavior, & Breast-Feeding Outcomes
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05906368 -
Hypotension Prediction Index to Predict Epidural-labor Analgesia Induced Hypotension
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03503656 -
"Compuflo®" in Epidural Space Identification
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT02197403 -
Paradoxical Excitement Response During Sedation Between Dexmedetomidine and Propofol in Hazardous Alcohol Drinker
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03344042 -
Effect of Epidural Opioid Administered in the First A Period on the Progress of Labour
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03690271 -
Study PIEB vs PIEB: the Dose is it Variable According to the Patients
|
||
Completed |
NCT04240912 -
Epidural Pressure Waveform Recordings by the CompuFlo® Cath-Checker System
|