View clinical trials related to Anemia, Aplastic.
Filter by:In a prospective, single-arm study, the efficacy and safety of Lusutrombopag in the treatment of relapsed/refractory/intolerable non-severe aplastic anemia (NSAA) were explored.
In a randomized, controlled clinical trial, the efficacy and safety of rodsipil combined with cyclosporine versus cyclosporine alone in the treatment of newly diagnosed non-transfusion-dependent NSAA were compared.
A phase II trial of a reduced intensity conditioned (RIC) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) for idiopathic severe aplastic anemia (SAA), paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), acquired pure red cell aplasia (aPRCA), or acquired amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia (aAT) utilizing population pharmacokinetic (popPK)-guided individual dosing of pre-transplant conditioning and differential dosing of low dose total body irradiation based on age, presence of myelodysplasia and/or clonal hematopoiesis.
This research is being done to investigate the safety and effectiveness of Darzalex Faspro (daratumumab and hyaluronidase-fihj) (a monoclonal antibody that targets plasma cells that make antibodies) and whether it can lower donor specific antibodies (DSA) levels to low enough levels to permit patients to proceed with allogeneic peripheral blood transplant (alloBMT). Those being asked to participate have high DSA levels that puts those being asked to participate at high risk of rejecting the available donor's blood stem cells and making those being asked to participate ineligible to receive a stem cell transplant.
This is a multicenter, single-arm, non-interventional study (NIS) to confirm the safety and efficacy of eltrombopag in Anti-Thymocyte Globulin (ATG) treatment naive pediatric patients with aplastic anemia (AA).
Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is an important complication after transplantation, with an incidence of 40-60%, which can increase non-relapse mortality if poorly controlled. At present, the standard prophylaxis for GVHD is cyclosporine combined with methotrexate. However, calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) can cause some vital side effects, which are not tolerated by some patients. Therefore, this study aims to explore the safety and efficacy of Sirolimus in combination with Abatacept and Mycophenolate Mofetil for the prophylaxis of GVHD in patients with haplo-HSCT who are intolerant to calcineurin inhibitors.
Title: Efficacy and safety of Avatrombopag VS Avatrombopag combined with rhTPO in patients with severe aplastic anemia: a single-center, controlled study Observation group: Patients with severe aplastic anemia who did not respond to initial treatment (unconditional HSCT or ATG) or other treatments (except HSCT) Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Avatrombopag and rhTPO in the treatment of patients with severe aplastic anemia, to provide more treatment options for patients with severe aplastic anemia who are unable to undergo transplantation /ATG or have failed previous treatment, and to provide evidence-based evidence for the use of Avatrombopag or combined with rhTPO to promote hematopoietic recovery Experimental design: Single center, controlled study Total number of cases: 30 cases/group, 2 groups Case selection criteria: Inclusion criteria: 1. Age: > 18 years old, gender is not limited; 2. Patients clinically diagnosed with severe aplastic anemia (diagnostic criteria: ① myelocyte hyperplasia < 25% of normal; If ≥ 25% of normal but < 50%, the remaining hematopoietic cells should be < 30%. ② Blood routine must have two of the following three items: ANC < 0.5×109 /L; The absolute value of reticulocyte was < 20×109 /L; PLT < 20×109 /L). ③ If ANC < 0.2×109 /L, the diagnosis is very severe aplastic anemia), including patients who are newly diagnosed or have failed other treatments; 3. Patients currently undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or ATG without conditions; 4. Eastern Cancer Collaboration Group (ECOG) score 0-2; 5. Informed consent must be signed before participating in the study. Exclusion criteria: One of the following circumstances is not eligible for inclusion: 1. Patients with severe bleeding and/or infection that cannot be controlled after standard treatment; 2. Diagnosis of congenital hematopoietic failure (such as Fanconi anemia, congenital dyskeratosis, etc.); 3. Other causes of pancytopenia and bone marrow hypoproliferative diseases (such as hemolytic PNH, hypoproliferative MDS/AML, autoantibody-mediated pancytopenia, etc.); 4. All laboratory or clinically confirmed HIV infection, hepatitis C infection, chronic hepatitis B infection, or evidence of active hepatitis during screening; 5. Cytogenetic evidence of bone marrow abnormalities in clonal blood diseases; 6. History of thromboembolism or current use of anticoagulants within the past 6 months; 7. Accompanied by any one or more malignant diseases; 8. Treatment with another investigational agent within 30 days prior to the first dose of Avatrombopag; 9. Patients who cannot understand or are unwilling to sign an informed consent form (ICF); 10. Pregnant or lactating women; 11. The female patient or the female spouse of the male patient is unable to take effective contraceptive measures; 12. The Investigator considers that there are any other circumstances that may cause the subject to be unable to complete the study or that pose a significant risk to the subject. Exit criteria: 1. The subject or his legal guardian voluntarily requests withdrawal; 2. Violation of inclusion/exclusion criteria; 3. Poor medication compliance; 4. The subject's condition requires treatment with drugs prohibited by the study; 5. Adverse events occur that cause subjects to be unable to continue the study; 6. Other unexplained severe comorbidities; 7. Pregnancy occurs during treatment; 8. Subjects deemed unsuitable for further study by the investigator. Test termination: 1. For safety reasons, the study sponsor proposes to stop the study; 2. The Ethics committee decides to stop the study; 3. The lead researcher decides to stop the study. Investigational drug: Avatrombopag: tablet, specification: 20 mg/ tablet. rhTPO: 15000 units /1 ml. Treatment plan: This clinical trial is planned to carry out a 3-month drug study. A: The Avatrombopag group was given Avatrombopag: 40 mg/ time, once a day, orally, for 3 months. B: Avatrombopag +rhTPO group, Avatrombopag: 40 mg/ time, once a day, orally; rhTPO: 15000U/ time, once a day, subcutaneous injection; Both were 3 months. Efficacy index: Main therapeutic indicators: Overall response rate at 3 months (OR); Secondary efficacy measures: Complete response rate at 3 months (CR); The time of the first occurrence of PR and CR within 3 months of medication; The proportion of subjects who were off platelet transfusion at 3 months; Hemorrhage score records of patients within 3 months of medication; Health-related quality of life score (SF-36 scale). Efficacy criteria: Complete response (CR) : HGB > 100 g/L; ANC > 1.5 × 109 /L; PLT > 100×109/L; Partial response (PR) : disengagement from component blood transfusion and no longer meeting the diagnostic criteria for SAA; Invalid (NR) : SAA diagnostic criteria are still met.
Aplastic anemia (AA) is a group of clinical syndromes caused by a significant decrease in bone marrow hematopoietic tissue from different etiologies, resulting in hematopoietic failure. Treatment options for patients with aplastic anemia are very limited. In a phase II/III, multicenter, open-label study exploring the efficacy and safety of romiplostim, the primary endpoint showed an overall response rate of 84% [95% CI 66-95%] at week 27. However, there are no prospective clinical data exploring whether romiplostim combined with ciclosporin (CsA) can further improve efficacy than ciclosporin monotherapy in newly diagnosed NSAA. Therefore, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of romiplostim in combination with CsA versus CsA monotherapy.
Aplastic anemia (AA) is a group of clinical syndromes. Treatment options are very limited. The results of a previous clinical study showed good efficacy and a high safety profile of herombopag in improving thrombocytopenia, but this result needs to be supported by more data. In our study, patients who were willing to participate in this study and were diagnosed with transfusion-dependent non-heavy aplastic anemia were randomized to the rhTPO combined with herombopag + cyclosporine group and given rhTPO (at a dose of 1500 U by subcutaneous injection once daily for 7 d, 28 d for 3 courses) +Herombopag(10 mg/day for 3 months) + cyclosporine (3-5 mg/kg/d for 3 months). -5 mg/kg/d for at least 6 months) and herombopag + cyclosporine (10 mg/day for 3 months) + cyclosporine (3-5 mg/kg/d for at least 6 months) in the herombopag+ cyclosporine group to observe the efficacy and safety.
This is a multicenter, prospective, randonmized study. Our previous retrospective study showed that for SAA patients who were intolerant to ATG, CsA+ eltrombopag (EPAG) had similar efficacy to CsA+ATG+EPAG. Since the action mechanism of AVA and EPAG is not exactly the same, and the metabolic level of the elderly is not the same as that of younger patients, it is unknown whether there are predictive factors of efficacy in the treatment of AVA. We wondered whether CsA+AVA could achieve an efficacy similar to CsA+ATG+AVA in the Elderly. Meanwhile, to explore the predictive factors of efficacy, to find out a safe and effective treatment strategy for the Elderly.