Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03214640
Other study ID # IRB00044968
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date October 23, 2017
Est. completion date April 13, 2019

Study information

Verified date March 2020
Source Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

We hypothesize that the Rivanna Accuro or similar U/S device would reduce time to success of identifying epidural and/or intrathecal spaces as compared to conventional palpation method.


Description:

Administration of (neuraxial blocks) spinal and epidural blocks is commonly achieved by first palpating the landmarks for midline with spinous process and iliac crest for L3-4-5 intervertebral spaces. With an epidural block, a loss of resistance in a pressurized syringe is used to incrementally advance the epidural needle until identification of epidural space with loss of resistance in the pressurized syringe. With a spinal block, the spinal needle is advanced incrementally until a noted "feel" of dural puncture together with return of spinal fluid via the spinal needle. The palpation technique and somewhat "blind" technique to identify the spinal and epidural spaces become more difficult and less reliable particularly with the increasing prevalence of the morbid and super-morbid obese patients. Ultrasound devices have become common and successful with non-neuraxial blocks and venous accesses, both involving mostly non-bony, soft tissues. Application of conventional ultrasound for neuraxial blocks has been limited by its bulkiness, limited imaging for bony structures and lack of automated artificial intelligent algorithm for pattern recognition. Recent technological advancement has addressed the aforementioned limitations. Rivanna Accuro is one such device that has gained FDA approval and may have helped in addressing some of these issues. It is a handheld (pocket size) U/S device with real time pattern recognition for bony structures such as the spine while providing 3-D overlay for recognition of the midline spinous process and epidural spaces and distance. The investigators hypothesize that the Rivanna Accuro or similar U/S device would reduce time to success of identifying epidural and/or intrathecal spaces as compared to conventional palpation method. We will compare placement of neuraxial block between palpation method versus ultrasound method. We will compare placement of spinal block for cesarean delivery with palpation versus with ultrasound method, and then comparing placement of neuraxial analgeisa block (combined spinal epidural analgesia) for labor analgesia with palpation versus ultrasound method.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 128
Est. completion date April 13, 2019
Est. primary completion date April 13, 2019
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Female
Age group 18 Years to 50 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - BMI >30 - Female requesting analgesia for delivery, be it via vaginal or cesarean delivery Exclusion Criteria: - Allergy to ultrasound gel - Contraindication to receiving neuraxial analgesia - Under the age of 18

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Rivanna Accuro US Device
When the subject is ready for neuraxial procedure, the location for the epidural or spinal needle insertion will be identified with Rivanna Accuro U/S device. For subjects in group C-R or L-R, the needle insertion site will be the site identified by the Rivanna Accuro U/S device. After placement of spinal for Cesarean or epidural for labor, the usual standard dose of medication will be administered as in usual manner for patients regardless in this study or not.
Other:
Palpation
When the subject is ready for neuraxial procedure, the location for the epidural or spinal needle insertion will be identified with Palpation method using conventional landmarks (spinous process and iliac crest). For subjects in group C-P or L-P, the needle insertion site will be the site identified by the Palpation method. After placement of spinal for Cesarean or epidural for labor, the usual standard dose of medication will be administered as in usual manner for patients regardless in this study or not.
Procedure:
Neuraxial Analgesia
Labor analgesia will be provided utilizing the standard medications to provide labor analgesia
Spinal Block
Spinal anesthetic medications will be utilized in providing surgical block for cesarean delivery as is standard of care

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Novant Health Forsyth Medical Center Winston-Salem North Carolina

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Time to Success of Neuraxial Block Placement Time it takes to successfully identify the epidural space (defined by loss of resistance) for the groups of subjects receiving labor neuraxial analgesia; and spinal fluid flow into the hub of spinal needle for the groups of subjects receiving cesarean spinal anesthetic - length of time (in minutes) it takes to get block placed, between palpation and ultrasound groups among patients with labor neuraxial analgesia patients and cesarean spinal anesthetic, respectively and spinal fluid flow with spinal needle - length of time (in seconds) it takes to get block placed, between the 2 groups. 60-225 seconds
Secondary Total Number of Needle Passes Per Placement Number of needle Passes before successful placement 1 hour
Secondary Needle Passing Success at First Attempt Number of times of success (Number of patients) with first (single) attempt needle pass success 1 hour
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Not yet recruiting NCT05534230 - Dexmedetomidine for Pain Reduction in CABG N/A
Recruiting NCT06275698 - HONEY for the Treatment of POst-Tonsillectomy Pain N/A
Recruiting NCT04436224 - Hydromorphone for ICU-analgesia in Patients With Non-mechanical Ventilation Phase 4
Not yet recruiting NCT04548323 - Hypoalgesic Effects of Walking and Running Imagined
Completed NCT06054945 - Clinical Impact of IPACK Block Addition to Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block
Completed NCT04394481 - Extension of Analgesia by Combined Injection of Dexamethasone and Dexmedetomidine After Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery Phase 4
Completed NCT04690647 - The Efficacy of Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for Analgesia After Elective Total Hip Replacement. N/A
Completed NCT05034601 - ESPB vs TPVB for Postoperative Analgesia After the Nuss Procedure N/A
Completed NCT03740815 - Feasibility of Serratus Plane Block Associated With Sedation in Axillary Dissection N/A
Recruiting NCT05454202 - Assessment of the Interest of ANI in the Non-communicating Patient in Palliative Care
Recruiting NCT04554186 - Serratus Anterior Plane Block Versus Thoracic Paravertebral Block. N/A
Suspended NCT04860635 - Safety of F14 Following Total Knee Replacement Phase 2/Phase 3
Not yet recruiting NCT06393777 - Effectiveness of Pre-administered Natural Sweet-tasting Solution (Honey) for Decreasing Pain of Needle Insertion N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04519463 - The Effect of Local Anesthesia With Lidocaine During Insertion and Removal of Nasal Packing Early Phase 1
Completed NCT02916342 - Interscalene Block Versus Combined Supraprascapular: Axillary Nerve Blocks Phase 4
Not yet recruiting NCT02549118 - Tenoxicam for Intrapartum Analgesia Phase 2
Completed NCT03206554 - Local Infiltration Analgesia in Total Knee Arthroplasty Phase 2
Not yet recruiting NCT02190760 - Comparison Between Perineural and Systemic Effect of Dexamethasone for Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block. N/A
Completed NCT01789606 - Self-Selection and Actual Use Trial of Ibuprofen 600 mg Immediate Release/Extended Caplet Phase 3
Completed NCT01299584 - ULTIVA Post Marketing Surveillance N/A