Amebic Dysentery Clinical Trial
Official title:
METRONIDAZOLE IV DRUG USE INVESTIGATION
NCT number | NCT03491228 |
Other study ID # | A6831007 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Completed |
Phase | |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | July 2015 |
Est. completion date | August 2017 |
Verified date | December 2018 |
Source | Pfizer |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Observational |
Secondary Data Collection Study; safety and effectiveness of Anaemetro under Japanese medical practice
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 107 |
Est. completion date | August 2017 |
Est. primary completion date | August 2017 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | N/A and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Patients who have not used metronidazole (injection) in the past, and have been given this drug for treatment of anaerobic infection, infectious enterocolitis, or amebic dysentery. Patients who have used metronidazole (oral agent and vaginal tablet) in the past are eligible, and should not be excluded from this study. Exclusion Criteria: - No exclusion criteria are set out in this study. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
n/a |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Pfizer |
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Number of Participants With Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR) | An adverse drug reaction (ADR) was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to ANAEMETRO Intravenous infusion in a participant who received ANAEMETRO Intravenous infusion. A serious ADR was an ADR resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Relatedness to ANAEMETRO Intravenous infusion was assessed by the physician. | Maximum 8 weeks | |
Secondary | Clinical Response Rate | Clinical response of ANAEMETRO Intravenous infusion was evaluated comprehensively at the completion of the observation period, being assessed as "effective," "not effective," or "indeterminate" by the physician based on clinical symptoms. Clinical response rate, which was defined as the percentage of participants evaluated as "effective" over the total number of assessable effectiveness analysis population, was presented along with the corresponding 2-sided 95% CI. |
Maximum 8 weeks | |
Secondary | Clinical Response Rates by Target Diseases | Clinical response of ANAEMETRO Intravenous infusion was evaluated comprehensively at the completion of the observation period, being assessed as "effective," "not effective," or "indeterminate" by the physician based on clinical symptoms. Clinical response rate, which was defined as the percentage of participants evaluated as "effective" over the total number of assessable effectiveness analysis population, was presented along with the corresponding 2-sided 95% CI. Participants assessed as "effective" by the following target diseases were counted to assess whether they contribute to the clinical response: anaerobic infection, infectious enterocolitis, amebic dysentery, and the infection with both infectious enterocolitis and amebic dysentery. |
Maximum 8 weeks |