Amblyopia Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Randomized Trial Comparing Patching Versus Atropine for Amblyopia in 7 to < 13 Year Olds
The purpose of this study is:
- To compare the effectiveness of weekend atropine plus near activities and daily
patching plus near activities for moderate amblyopia (20/40 to 20/100) and severe
amblyopia (20/125 to 20/400) in improving vision in the amblyopic eye of 7 to <13 year
olds.
- To determine the maximum improvement in vision of the amblyopic eye with each
treatment.
- To determine whether amblyopia is associated with structural abnormalities of optic
nerve fiber layer.
Although there is consensus that amblyopia can be treated effectively in young children,
many eye care practitioners believe that treatment beyond a certain age is ineffective. Some
clinicians have believed that a treatment response is unlikely after the age of 6 or 7
years, while others have considered age 9 or 10 years to be the upper age limit for
successful treatment. The American Academy of Ophthalmology Preferred Practice Pattern for
amblyopia recommends treatment up to age 10 years. The opinion that amblyopia treatment is
ineffective in older children may have arisen because the age of 6 to 7 years is thought to
be the end of the "critical period" for visual development in humans. This belief, however,
was not based on adequate prospectively-collected data.
To address this issue of the response of amblyopia to treatment in children 7 years and
older, the Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group (PEDIG) conducted a randomized trial of
507 patients (aged 7 to <18 years) with amblyopic eye visual acuity ranging from 20/40 to
20/400. Patients were provided with optimal optical correction and then randomized to a
Treatment Group (2 to 6 hours per day of prescribed patching of the sound eye combined with
near visual activities for all patients plus atropine one drop per day in the sound eye for
7 to <13 year olds) or an Optical Correction Group (optical correction alone). Patients
whose amblyopic eye acuity improved 10 or more letters (2 lines) by 24 weeks were considered
responders. In the 7 to <13 year olds (N=404), 53% of the Treatment Group were responders
compared with 25% of the Optical Correction Group (P<0.001). In the 13 to <18 year olds
(N=103), the responder rates were 25% and 23% respectively overall (adjusted P=0.22), but
47% and 20% respectively among patients not previously treated with patching and/or atropine
for amblyopia (adjusted P=0.03). Most patients, including responders, were left with a
residual visual acuity deficit.
The use of multiple modalities (patching, atropine, near visual activities) in the treatment
regimen for the 7 to <13 year olds in this trial (ATS3) was an effort to maximize the
therapeutic response. Patients age 13 years and older were prescribed patching but not
atropine because of concern that the continual optical blur from the atropine could have a
deleterious effect on their ability to drive and perform other activities. Prescribed
patching was 2 to 6 hours a day to limit patch wear to non-school hours and because our
prior studies of 3 to <7 year olds demonstrated that as little as two hours of patching a
day (when combined with near visual activities) is as effective as a greater number of
hours. Instructing patients to perform at least one hour of near activities while wearing
the patch was based on the unproven clinical opinion that near activities can augment the
effect of the occlusion therapy. A PEDIG pilot study suggested that near activities are
beneficial and this question of benefit of near activities is currently being studied in
another randomized clinical trial. Atropine placed in the sound eye once a day and two days
a week has been demonstrated in younger children to be beneficial to the acuity of the
amblyopic eye, presumably due to its cycloplegic effect of blurring vision in the sound eye
especially at near fixation. In a study comparing daily and weekend atropine, daily atropine
was not found to be superior.
The unanswered question from this completed clinical trial is whether prescribing patching
or atropine alone could have produced a response similar to the combination therapy, or
whether in this age group, one treatment is better than the other. A poll of PEDIG
investigators at an investigator meeting on January 15, 2005 indicated that very few are
following the treatment regimen used in the prior study (ATS3); rather, most are prescribing
monotherapy—either patching or atropine—as the initial treatment for amblyopia in the 7 to
<13 year age range. Thus, a trial comparing atropine and patching as amblyopia treatments in
7 to <13 year olds is needed.
The study has been designed as a simple trial that, other than the type of amblyopia therapy
being determined through the randomization process, approximates standard clinical practice.
The two treatment regimes are: 1) Atropine 1% once each weekend day in the sound eye plus
near activities for at least one hour every day without the aid of reading glasses (with
increase to daily atropine at 5 weeks if acuity not improved by at least 5 letters) and 2)
Patching 2 hours per day plus near activities for one hour while patching (with increase to
4 hours per day for moderate amblyopes and > 4 hours per day for severe amblyopes at 5 weeks
if acuity not improved by at least 5 letters).
Optional Ancillary Study As part of the optic nerve imaging ancillary study, retinal nerve
fiber layer imaging using optical coherence tomography will be performed on some patients.
This will be optional for patients at participating sites. The procedure is not part of
standard care. The subject's pupils will need to be dilated, if not already dilated as part
of the exam. Testing of both eyes can be completed in about 15 minutes.
;
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT04238065 -
A Clinical Trial of Caterna Virtual Reality Facilitating Treatment in Children With Amblyopia
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04432181 -
Comparison of Deviation Types Among Astigmatic Children With Or Without Amblyopia
|
||
Terminated |
NCT02767856 -
Regimens of Intermittent Occlusion Therapy for Amblyopia in Children
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02458846 -
Efficacy of Visual Screening in Ontario
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01190813 -
Levodopa for the Treatment of Residual Amblyopia
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01109459 -
Multimodal Physician Intervention to Detect Amblyopia
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04313257 -
Monocular Action Video Game Treatment of Amblyopia
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04315649 -
Effect of 3D Movie Viewing on Stereopsis in Strabismus and / or Anisometropic Amblyops
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05223153 -
OCT-A and Amblyopia
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05522972 -
Establishing New Treatment Approaches for Amblyopia: Perceptual Learning and Video Games
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01430247 -
Vision Screening for the Detection of Amblyopia
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02200211 -
Study of Binocular Computer Activities for Treatment of Amblyopia
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06429280 -
Clinical Data Registry of Amblyopia Patients on Luminopia Treatment
|
||
Withdrawn |
NCT04959422 -
Assuring Ophthalmologic Follow up
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05612568 -
5 Years of Eye Screening for ARF in Children Aged <3 Years in Flanders
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03655912 -
Binocular Visual Therapy and Video Games for Amblyopia Treatment.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06150391 -
Evaluation of Amblyopia Protocols Using a Dichoptic Gabor Videogame Program
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03754153 -
Binocularly Balanced Viewing Study
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT02594358 -
Caffeine in Amblyopia Study
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT02246556 -
Dichoptic Virtual Reality Therapy for Amblyopia in Adults
|
Phase 1 |