Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Constraint Induced Language Therapy for Alzheimer Disease

Alzheimer Disease Clinical Trial

Official title:

A Phase II, Randomized, Blinded Study of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Constraint Induced Language Therapy for the Treatment of Chronic Aphasia - Alzheimer Disease Sub-study

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT04482179
• Other study ID #: 831532
• Secondary ID: R01DC016800-01A1
• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Phase: Phase 1
• Start date: February 19, 2020
• Est. completion date: August 31, 2024

Study information

• Verified date: January 2024
• Source: University of Pennsylvania
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Impaired verbal communication is a cardinal symptom of Alzheimer Disease (AD) and the source of enormous distress and disability. Effective therapies for this deficit are lacking. In light of the emerging literature demonstrating that Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) improves general cognition in subjects with Alzheimer Disease (AD), the investigators propose to study the effectiveness of TMS as a therapy for impaired verbal communication. The hypothesis to be tested is that TMS combined with Constraint Induced Language Therapy (CILT) improves verbal communication more than sham TMS and CILT. A second aim is to use state-of-the-art neuroimaging to understand the mechanisms underlying any beneficial effect of the treatment.

Description:

TMS is a technique by which a brief electrical current is induced in brain tissue causing a brief suppression of the excitability of the underlying tissue; the technique, which was introduced in the 1980s and has been extensively used around the world, has been shown to transiently improve or disrupt specific cognitive operations. To achieve this end, a coil is positioned against the subject's head. The delivery of a single pulse begins with the discharge of current from a capacitor into a circular or figure-of-eight coil; this electrical current generates a brief magnetic field of up to 2.2 Tesla. As the pulse of electricity has a rise time of 0.2 ms. and a duration of 1 ms., the magnetic field changes in intensity quite rapidly. Because the magnetic field passes freely through the scalp, skull, and meninges, the flux in the magnetic field induces a small electric field in the brain that transiently alters neural activity.

TMS may be delivered in a variety of ways. The investigators propose to use 10 Hz TMS; that is, TMS pulses will be delivered at a frequency of 10/second, for a total of 1200 pulses. Using the figure-of-eight coil to be employed here, TMS is thought to affect activity in approximately 1 cubic cm. of cortex. Many investigators have employed TMS for AD with a frequency of 10 Hz and most have delivered 1200 pulses per session.

The baseline phase will consist of 3 sessions, each lasting 1-2 hours depending on the stamina of the subject. The point of the baseline testing is to characterize the subject's language function. To that end, a number of standard language and neuropsychological tasks will be administered. These include the Western Aphasia Battery, Pyramids and Palm Trees test, Figural Fluency Test, word and non-word repetition tasks, spontaneous narrative production, CILT stimulus naming, and the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status. Additionally, during the baseline, subjects will undergo MRI of the brain or, if they have a contraindication to MRI, a CAT scan of the head. No contrast will be used.

In the treatment phase, there will be 10 TMS sessions over 2 consecutive weeks in which 30 two-second stimulation trains of 10 Hz TMS will be delivered every 30 seconds to the left inferior pars triangularis and to the left posterior superior left temporal gyrus at 100% motor threshold. There will be a total of 600 pulses to each site in each session for a total of 1200 pulses per session. Each TMS treatment session will be immediately followed by a 60-90 minute session of CILT.

There will be two 3-month post-treatment visits and two 6-month post-treatment visits in which the full battery of language and cognitive assessments will be repeated. Subjects who are able to undergo MRI scanning will have anatomic and fMRI scans at the first 6-month post-treatment visit.

The investigators will pair TMS with CILT which has been shown to have positive outcomes in post-stroke aphasia. CILT invokes use-dependent learning in communicative interactions by requiring spoken output and restricting use of alternative forms of communication, such as gestures. The investigators will use a dual card-matching task modeled after Maher et al. As in the original CILT design, the participant interacts verbally with a conversational partner (here, the speech language pathologist), in turn requesting a card of given description and complying with the partner's request. In this way, the treatment targets both production and comprehension. Moreover, as verbal targets increase in linguistic complexity across the protocol ("a ball", "throw a ball"; "Do you have a ball"?), a variety of lexical and phrasal structures are targeted. Studies of CILT have reported gains on multiple language behaviors, supporting its broad engagement of the language network.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Enrollment: 30
• Est. completion date: August 31, 2024
• Est. primary completion date: August 31, 2024
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 60 Years to 85 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• A diagnosis of mild-moderate AD as defined by the National Institute of Aging - Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association criteria

• Mild-moderate cognitive impairment, indicated by Mini-Mental Status Exam (MMSE) scores between 23 and 15 inclusive

• Must be right handed as defined by the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory

• Must be a native English speaker

• Must be able to understand the nature of the study, and give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

• History of stroke

• History of seizure

• History of any other significant neurologic disease (e.g., ALS)

• Significant depression as defined by the Geriatric Depression Scale.

• Any significant medical disorder that, in the view of the investigators, could threaten the subject's ability to complete the study (e.g., cancer, significant cardiac disease)

• Any contraindications to TMS, including uncontrolled seizures, previous brain surgery, and history of tinnitus

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Alzheimer Disease

Intervention

Device:
• Active TMS
Active TMS will be delivered at 100% motor threshold

Behavioral:
• CILT
60-90 minutes of CILT will be administered during each treatment session

Device:
• Sham TMS
Sham TMS will be administered

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	University of Pennsylvania	Philadelphia	Pennsylvania

Sponsors (3)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University of Pennsylvania	National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD), National Institutes of Health (NIH)

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (47)

Ahmed MA, Darwish ES, Khedr EM, El Serogy YM, Ali AM. Effects of low versus high frequencies of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on cognitive function and cortical excitability in Alzheimer's dementia. J Neurol. 2012 Jan;259(1):83-92. doi: 10.1007/s00415-011-6128-4. Epub 2011 Jun 14. — View Citation

Ayache SS, Farhat WH, Zouari HG, Hosseini H, Mylius V, Lefaucheur JP. Stroke rehabilitation using noninvasive cortical stimulation: motor deficit. Expert Rev Neurother. 2012 Aug;12(8):949-72. doi: 10.1586/ern.12.83. — View Citation

Bentwich J, Dobronevsky E, Aichenbaum S, Shorer R, Peretz R, Khaigrekht M, Marton RG, Rabey JM. Beneficial effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with cognitive training for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease: a proof of concept study. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2011 Mar;118(3):463-71. doi: 10.1007/s00702-010-0578-1. Epub 2011 Jan 19. — View Citation

Brem, A. K., Schilberg, L., Freitas, C., Atkinson, N., Seligson, E., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2013). Effects of cognitive training and rTMS in Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimer's & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 9(4), P664.

Buckner RL, Sepulcre J, Talukdar T, Krienen FM, Liu H, Hedden T, Andrews-Hanna JR, Sperling RA, Johnson KA. Cortical hubs revealed by intrinsic functional connectivity: mapping, assessment of stability, and relation to Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci. 2009 Feb 11;29(6):1860-73. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5062-08.2009. — View Citation

Cheng CPW, Wong CSM, Lee KK, Chan APK, Yeung JWF, Chan WC. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on improvement of cognition in elderly patients with cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018 Jan;33(1):e1-e13. doi: 10.1002/gps.4726. Epub 2017 May 11. — View Citation

Cotelli M, Calabria M, Manenti R, Rosini S, Zanetti O, Cappa SF, Miniussi C. Improved language performance in Alzheimer disease following brain stimulation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011 Jul;82(7):794-7. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2009.197848. Epub 2010 Jun 23. — View Citation

Cotelli M, Manenti R, Cappa SF, Geroldi C, Zanetti O, Rossini PM, Miniussi C. Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on action naming in patients with Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 2006 Nov;63(11):1602-4. doi: 10.1001/archneur.63.11.1602. — View Citation

Deters KD, Nho K, Risacher SL, Kim S, Ramanan VK, Crane PK, Apostolova LG, Saykin AJ; Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Genome-wide association study of language performance in Alzheimer's disease. Brain Lang. 2017 Sep;172:22-29. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2017.04.008. Epub 2017 May 31. — View Citation

Drumond Marra HL, Myczkowski ML, Maia Memoria C, Arnaut D, Leite Ribeiro P, Sardinha Mansur CG, Lancelote Alberto R, Boura Bellini B, Alves Fernandes da Silva A, Tortella G, Ciampi de Andrade D, Teixeira MJ, Forlenza OV, Marcolin MA. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Address Mild Cognitive Impairment in the Elderly: A Randomized Controlled Study. Behav Neurol. 2015;2015:287843. doi: 10.1155/2015/287843. Epub 2015 Jun 16. — View Citation

Engels MM, Stam CJ, van der Flier WM, Scheltens P, de Waal H, van Straaten EC. Declining functional connectivity and changing hub locations in Alzheimer's disease: an EEG study. BMC Neurol. 2015 Aug 20;15:145. doi: 10.1186/s12883-015-0400-7. — View Citation

Faroqi-Shah, Y., & Virion, C. R. (2009). Constraint-induced language therapy for agrammatism: Role of grammaticality constraints. Aphasiology, 23(7-8), 977-988.

Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. No abstract available. — View Citation

Fornito A, Zalesky A, Breakspear M. The connectomics of brain disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015 Mar;16(3):159-72. doi: 10.1038/nrn3901. — View Citation

Foygel, D., & Dell, G. S. (2000). Models of impaired lexical access in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 43(2), 182-216.

Haffen E, Chopard G, Pretalli JB, Magnin E, Nicolier M, Monnin J, Galmiche J, Rumbach L, Pazart L, Sechter D, Vandel P. A case report of daily left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) as an adjunctive treatment for Alzheimer disease. Brain Stimul. 2012 Jul;5(3):264-266. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.03.003. Epub 2011 Mar 30. No abstract available. — View Citation

Hameister, I., Nickels, L., Abel, S., & Croot, K. (2017). "Do you have mowing the lawn?"-improvements in word retrieval and grammar following constraint-induced language therapy in primary progressive aphasia. Aphasiology, 31(3), 308-331.

Hamilton RH, Chrysikou EG, Coslett B. Mechanisms of aphasia recovery after stroke and the role of noninvasive brain stimulation. Brain Lang. 2011 Jul;118(1-2):40-50. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.02.005. Epub 2011 Apr 2. — View Citation

Hodges JR, Salmon DP, Butters N. Semantic memory impairment in Alzheimer's disease: failure of access or degraded knowledge? Neuropsychologia. 1992 Apr;30(4):301-14. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(92)90104-t. — View Citation

Howard, D., & Patterson, K. E. (1992). The Pyramids and Palm Trees Test: A Test of Semantic Access from Words and Pictures. Thames Valley Test Company

Kakuda W, Abo M, Shimizu M, Sasanuma J, Okamoto T, Yokoi A, Taguchi K, Mitani S, Harashima H, Urushidani N, Urashima M; NEURO Investigators. A multi-center study on low-frequency rTMS combined with intensive occupational therapy for upper limb hemiparesis in post-stroke patients. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2012 Jan 20;9(1):4. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-9-4. — View Citation

Koch G, Bonni S, Pellicciari MC, Casula EP, Mancini M, Esposito R, Ponzo V, Picazio S, Di Lorenzo F, Serra L, Motta C, Maiella M, Marra C, Cercignani M, Martorana A, Caltagirone C, Bozzali M. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the precuneus enhances memory and neural activity in prodromal Alzheimer's disease. Neuroimage. 2018 Apr 1;169:302-311. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.048. Epub 2017 Dec 19. — View Citation

Koganemaru S, Mima T, Thabit MN, Ikkaku T, Shimada K, Kanematsu M, Takahashi K, Fawi G, Takahashi R, Fukuyama H, Domen K. Recovery of upper-limb function due to enhanced use-dependent plasticity in chronic stroke patients. Brain. 2010 Nov;133(11):3373-84. doi: 10.1093/brain/awq193. Epub 2010 Aug 5. — View Citation

Lee J, Choi BH, Oh E, Sohn EH, Lee AY. Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease with Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Cognitive Training: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. J Clin Neurol. 2016 Jan;12(1):57-64. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2016.12.1.57. Epub 2015 Sep 11. — View Citation

Martin A, Fedio P. Word production and comprehension in Alzheimer's disease: the breakdown of semantic knowledge. Brain Lang. 1983 May;19(1):124-41. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(83)90059-7. — View Citation

Medaglia JD, Huang W, Segarra S, Olm C, Gee J, Grossman M, Ribeiro A, McMillan CT, Bassett DS. Brain network efficiency is influenced by the pathologic source of corticobasal syndrome. Neurology. 2017 Sep 26;89(13):1373-1381. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004324. Epub 2017 Aug 4. — View Citation

Medaglia JD, Lynall ME, Bassett DS. Cognitive network neuroscience. J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Aug;27(8):1471-91. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00810. Epub 2015 Mar 24. — View Citation

Medina J, Norise C, Faseyitan O, Coslett HB, Turkeltaub PE, Hamilton RH. Finding the Right Words: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Improves Discourse Productivity in Non-fluent Aphasia After Stroke. Aphasiology. 2012 Sep 1;26(9):1153-1168. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2012.710316. Epub 2012 Aug 29. — View Citation

Mirman D, Chen Q, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Faseyitan OK, Coslett HB, Schwartz MF. Neural organization of spoken language revealed by lesion-symptom mapping. Nat Commun. 2015 Apr 16;6:6762. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7762. — View Citation

Mohs RC, Rosen WG, Davis KL. The Alzheimer's disease assessment scale: an instrument for assessing treatment efficacy. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1983;19(3):448-50. No abstract available. — View Citation

Nicholas LE, Brookshire RH. A system for quantifying the informativeness and efficiency of the connected speech of adults with aphasia. J Speech Hear Res. 1993 Apr;36(2):338-50. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3602.338. — View Citation

Norise C, Hamilton RH. Non-invasive Brain Stimulation in the Treatment of Post-stroke and Neurodegenerative Aphasia: Parallels, Differences, and Lessons Learned. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Jan 23;10:675. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00675. eCollection 2016. — View Citation

Pulvermuller F, Neininger B, Elbert T, Mohr B, Rockstroh B, Koebbel P, Taub E. Constraint-induced therapy of chronic aphasia after stroke. Stroke. 2001 Jul;32(7):1621-6. doi: 10.1161/01.str.32.7.1621. — View Citation

Rabey JM, Dobronevsky E, Aichenbaum S, Gonen O, Marton RG, Khaigrekht M. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with cognitive training is a safe and effective modality for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease: a randomized, double-blind study. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2013 May;120(5):813-9. doi: 10.1007/s00702-012-0902-z. Epub 2012 Oct 18. — View Citation

Rabey JM, Dobronevsky E. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) combined with cognitive training is a safe and effective modality for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease: clinical experience. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2016 Dec;123(12):1449-1455. doi: 10.1007/s00702-016-1606-6. Epub 2016 Sep 8. — View Citation

Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM, Pascual-Leone A; Safety of TMS Consensus Group. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;120(12):2008-2039. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016. Epub 2009 Oct 14. — View Citation

Rubinov M, Sporns O. Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations. Neuroimage. 2010 Sep;52(3):1059-69. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003. Epub 2009 Oct 9. — View Citation

Saur D, Lange R, Baumgaertner A, Schraknepper V, Willmes K, Rijntjes M, Weiller C. Dynamics of language reorganization after stroke. Brain. 2006 Jun;129(Pt 6):1371-84. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl090. Epub 2006 Apr 25. — View Citation

Seniow J, Waldowski K, Lesniak M, Iwanski S, Czepiel W, Czlonkowska A. Transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with speech and language training in early aphasia rehabilitation: a randomized double-blind controlled pilot study. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2013 May-Jun;20(3):250-61. doi: 10.1310/tsr2003-250. — View Citation

Shewan CM, Kertesz A. Reliability and validity characteristics of the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB). J Speech Hear Disord. 1980 Aug;45(3):308-24. doi: 10.1044/jshd.4503.308. — View Citation

Silvanto J, Muggleton N, Walsh V. State-dependency in brain stimulation studies of perception and cognition. Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Dec;12(12):447-54. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.09.004. Epub 2008 Oct 24. — View Citation

Stam CJ. Modern network science of neurological disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014 Oct;15(10):683-95. doi: 10.1038/nrn3801. Epub 2014 Sep 4. — View Citation

Szatloczki G, Hoffmann I, Vincze V, Kalman J, Pakaski M. Speaking in Alzheimer's Disease, is That an Early Sign? Importance of Changes in Language Abilities in Alzheimer's Disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2015 Oct 20;7:195. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00195. eCollection 2015. — View Citation

Vacas SM, Stella F, Loureiro JC, Simoes do Couto F, Oliveira-Maia AJ, Forlenza OV. Noninvasive brain stimulation for behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019 Sep;34(9):1336-1345. doi: 10.1002/gps.5003. Epub 2018 Oct 17. — View Citation

van den Heuvel MP, Hulshoff Pol HE. Exploring the brain network: a review on resting-state fMRI functional connectivity. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2010 Aug;20(8):519-34. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2010.03.008. Epub 2010 May 14. — View Citation

van den Heuvel MP, Sporns O. Network hubs in the human brain. Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 Dec;17(12):683-96. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.012. — View Citation

Wu Y, Xu W, Liu X, Xu Q, Tang L, Wu S. Adjunctive treatment with high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the behavioral and psychological symptoms of patients with Alzheimer's disease: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study. Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;27(5):280-8. doi: 10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.215107. — View Citation

* Note: There are 47 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Change in WAB-AQ	Overall change in Western Aphasia Battery - Aphasia Quotient (WAB-AQ) between the first baseline visit and the 6-month follow-up visit. WAB-AQ is measured on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores meaning greater language ability	6-months post-treatment
Secondary	Change in PNT	Change in naming accuracy on the Philadelphia Naming Test (PNT) between the first baseline visit and the 6-month follow-up visit. PNT naming accuracy is measured as a percentage from 0% to 100% with higher percentages meaning better naming ability.	6-months post-treatment