Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03690973
Other study ID # perio2018
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 4
First received
Last updated
Start date September 30, 2018
Est. completion date March 30, 2021

Study information

Verified date July 2021
Source Cairo University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The amount of hard tissue resorption following tooth extraction involves prosthetically driven implant placement; therefore, the development of ridge preservation techniques that result in less alveolar bone loss is of great interest, Alveolar ridge preservation are indicated to decrease the loss of ridge volume that follows tooth extraction.However, they do not prevent bone resorption because, depending on the technique.The protocol of placing implants immediately upon tooth extraction has been introduced into clinical practice which aims to preserve the socket from resorption, also immediate implant satisfy the patient as it decrease the time for crown insertion in addition to that it has a good survival.There is not adequate research data to clearly demonstrate that flapless socket preservation techniques are superior to techniques that involve raising a flap, but an animal study reported that the detachment of the periosteum from the buccal site of the ridge leads to an increase of the resorption rate, resulting in an increase of the ridge resorption


Description:

Socket preservation procedures have been performed to preserve hard and soft tissue volume, which can be partially lost after tooth removal. These procedures allow for wider and longer implant placement compared with non-augmented sockets and reduce the need for simultaneous augmentation procedures at the time of implant placement.It is expected that immediate implant avoid crestal resorption in the fresh extraction socket in humans also immediate installation at the time of extraction offers potential advantages for both practitioners and patients. It allows a decrease in treatment time and may result in an increase in patient satisfaction.Also it is expected that flapless procedure include maintenance of the buccal keratinized gingival , and prevention of alterations to the gingival contours and migration of the mucogingival junction that are often experienced after raising a flap


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 32
Est. completion date March 30, 2021
Est. primary completion date December 30, 2020
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age: Above 18 years. 2. Patients with single non-restorable teeth in anterior or premolar area. 3. Patients with adequate bone volume for the dental implant procedure. 4. Patients with good oral hygiene 5. Patient consent approval and signing. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Heavy smokers. 2. Systemic disease that contraindicates surgical implant placement 3. Presence of any acute pathosis at the site of surgery. 4. Patients with thin alveolar ridge.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Alveolar socket preservation with graft and flap surgery
Alveolar socket preservation with xenogenic bone graft and flap surgery
Device:
Immediate implant placement with bone using flapless surgery
Immediate implant placement with xenogenic bone graft using flapless surgery
Immediate implant placement with bone using flap surgery
Immediate implant placement with xenogenic bone graft using flap surgery
Drug:
Alveolar socket preservation with graft and flapless surgery
Alveolar socket preservation with xenogenic bone graft and flapless surgery

Locations

Country Name City State
Egypt Amr Mohamed Shaarawi Mansoura

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Cairo University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Egypt, 

References & Publications (2)

Aimetti M, Manavella V, Corano L, Ercoli E, Bignardi C, Romano F. Three-dimensional analysis of bone remodeling following ridge augmentation of compromised extraction sockets in periodontitis patients: A randomized controlled study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Feb;29(2):202-214. doi: 10.1111/clr.13099. Epub 2017 Nov 17. — View Citation

Tonetti MS, Cortellini P, Graziani F, Cairo F, Lang NP, Abundo R, Conforti GP, Marquardt S, Rasperini G, Silvestri M, Wallkamm B, Wetzel A. Immediate versus delayed implant placement after anterior single tooth extraction: the timing randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2017 Feb;44(2):215-224. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12666. Epub 2017 Jan 31. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Bone volume changes volumetric bone changes by cone-beam computed tomography 1 year
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT04149080 - Effects of Simvastatin Gel on Bone Neoformation in Post-extraction Sockets: a Randomized Controlled Trial N/A
Recruiting NCT02300246 - Clinical, Histological and Micro-computed Tomographic Evaluation of Neoformed Tissue in Post-extraction Sockets Covered With Platelet-rich Fibrin (PRF) Membrane: a Randomized Controlled Trial Phase 1