View clinical trials related to Alveolar Bone Loss.
Filter by:Aim of the current study is to evaluate clinically and radiographically transcrestal sinus lifting with densah burs with the use of activated plasma albumin gel associated with simultaneous implant placement.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare implant stability, and crestal bone loss, when using minimal invasive ridge splitting versus convenient open flap technique. The main question is Does Minimal Invasive Implant ridge splitting ("transmucosal" without flap) influence the implant stability and crystal bone loss, when compared with the conventional open flap techniques? Researchers will compare Group A: Minimal Invasive Implant ridge splitting and Group B: Triangular flap technique is used to see if there is significant difference between the two groups when measuring implant stability, and crestal bone density.
To evaluate the clinical effect of site preservation after third molars extraction by using tooth extraction of third molars with site preservation using bio-oss and bio-guide in preventing the formation of deep periodontal pockets in the distal of second molars.
The purpose of this study was to report the clinical and radiographical outcomes of using autogenous cortical bone plates combined with sticky allogenic bone graft for augmenting maxillary anterior atrophic combined horizontal and vertical ridge defects with simultaneous versus staged implant placement.
The goal of this clinical trial is comparing the efficacy of custom-made zirconia sheet versus Polytetrafluoroethylene as a non-resorbable barrier in maxillary alveolar ridge augmentation. The main question it aims to answer are: 1. Is custom made zirconia sheets are valuable as a non-resorbable membrane in guided bone regeneration? 2. Does it have any adverse effects on the surrounding tissue? 3. the accuracy of using two software in the designing of the zircon membrane? - Participants will be selected according to the inclusion criteria of the study, having a defect in the upper jaw that prevent rehabilitation of the jaw. - Participant will undergo a surgical procedure for placement of bone graft and the non-resorbable membrane. Researchers will compare between two groups which differ only in the used membrane. a group where the researchers will place custom made zirconia sheet versus a group where the researchers will place Polytetrafluoroethylene.
The aim of study is evaluation of accuracy of completely versus partially limiting computer generated surgical three-dimensional guides during placement of zygoma implants in patients with atrophic maxillae.
Bone healing is affected by smoking, particularly healing of extraction sockets, showing deficiencies in vertical and horizontal bone dimensions compared to the healing of non-smokers. Several approaches have been made to stimulate. Bone wound healing, including human autologous blood-derived fractions. One of these fractions is the leukocyte platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF). L-PRF has been evidenced as potentially beneficial in promoting bone defect filling in alveolar bone and socket preservation in non-smokers. However, scarce evidence is related to this beneficial effect in smokers. This clinical trial aims to study and compare the in vivo effects of L-PRF during bone wound healing and regeneration in smokers. The main question is: Has the L-PRF a beneficial effect during alveolar ridge preservation in smokers? After consent, participants with tooth extraction indications and implant rehabilitation treatment will be enrolled. After randomization, participants will be assigned to an experimental group treated with L-PRF plugs and membranes or a control group (physiological healing). Participants will receive two interventions: - First intervention: Tooth extraction, intraoral scan, and Cone Beam Computed Tomography in the treated zone. - Second intervention (4 months after first intervention): intraoral scan and Cone Beam Computed Tomography in the treated zone
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare in patients with atrophied anterior maxilla, bone augmentation techniques ( gold standard bone block and tent pole technique). The main question it aims to answer is : Does screw tent pole technique provides better bone gain than autogenous bone block in atrophied anterior maxilla? - primary objective to assess amount of bone gain - secondary objective assess bone quality Participants will be randomly divided into two groups study group ( tent pole technique) and control group ( bone block) - each group will be followed up monthly for soft tissue dehiscence and after 6 month to assess bone gain and bone quality and then implant placement.
Objective: The objective is to evaluate the dimensional changes of soft tissue and alveolar ridge after extraction of posterior elements with different clinical protocols of alveolar preservation.
Atrophied jaw is a condition where there is insufficient bone quantity to place root form implants. Several treatment plans are available for treating atrophied jaws, including subperiosteal implants. Subperiosteal implants were introduced in the last century. Poor clinical results led those implants to be progressively abandoned. Recently, several Authors suggested a revival of subperiosteal implants as an alternative to regenerative procedures.