View clinical trials related to Allergic Rhinitis.
Filter by:There is no clinical evidence that face masks are efficient in birch pollen-induced asthma. As the use of face masks has become widespread worldwide to limit the spread of SARS-CoV-2, this study aims to demonstrate the clinical efficacy of medical masks in patients allergic to birch in the same way that clinical trial with drugs.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Azelastine HCl-Fluticasone propionate Nasal Spray 137-50 mcg/spray compared to Dymista™ in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis
The goal of this clinical trial is to test AllerPops' effectiveness in people who suffer from allergic rhinitis. The main question[s]it aims to answer are: 1. To assess the effectiveness of AllerPops on relieving nasal symptoms compared to the control group in volunteers with seasonal/year-long allergies during the first 7 days of the 21-day intervention period. 2. To evaluate the safety of AllerPops administration in volunteers with seasonal/year-long allergies during a 21-day intervention period. Up to 30 days between Screening (V1) and Baseline (V2), and a 21-day intervention period, with dosing occurring every other day for a minimum of 3 doses, and thereafter until the participant is satisfied with the relief of the nasal allergy symptoms. The suitable season for the trial will be determined based on the seasonal variation measures. Researchers will compare slow and fast consuming groups to see if the way of use impact the effectiveness.
The aim of this clinical study is to compare the efficacy of Elonide Nasal Spray to Nasonex Nasal Spray and Placebo (non-active ingredient) in the management of allergic rhinitis. There are two hypotheses of this study: 1. Elonide nasal spray is same efficacy to Nasonex nasal spray. 2. Elonide nasal spray is more efficient to placebo.
The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of exercise at different temperatures on nasal blood flow and symptoms in allergic rhinitis patients.
The purpose of this study was to determine the acute effect of high intensity interval exercise on respiratory function and rhinitis symptoms in allergic rhinitis patients.
At present, most studies mainly focussed on severe patients, and there was no comparison of symptom differences between AR patients and healthy people with mild infection to evaluate the symptoms of AR patients during infection and to provide preventive treatment in advance. So this experiment was designed.
Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a disorder that affects more than 500 million people worldwide. Nasal congestion is one of the most general and bothersome symptoms in rhinitis, which affects the quality of life (QOL). Current medications are undesirable due to their side-effects. Acupuncture for AR in general can be considered as safe and can be seen as a potential remedial blueprint for nasal congestion. Evidence supported that acupuncture is clinically used for signs and symptoms of nose disorders, such as nasal congestion, with effectiveness, but whether acupuncture has immediate, post-treatment and long-term effects on nasal congestion in AR is not verified by strictly designed clinical study. The ANCAR trial uses a standard treatment protocol with a fixed set of acupuncture points - to be as scientific as possible from Western medical viewpoint - to open the nose and affect underlying energetic imbalance and immunity at the same time, to maintain its nose opening effect. This novel acupuncture treatment protocol can be seen as a solid and profound approach from which every AR patient may benefit.
This study was to investigate the comparison among acute effects of various aerobic exercise on symptoms in allergic rhinitis patients.
The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of pilates training on symptoms in patients with allergic rhinitis.