All Orthopedic Disorders Clinical Trial
Official title:
How to Measure Patient Satisfaction
| NCT number | NCT03686735 |
| Other study ID # | 2018-04-0039 |
| Secondary ID | |
| Status | Completed |
| Phase | |
| First received | |
| Last updated | |
| Start date | June 22, 2018 |
| Est. completion date | March 2, 2019 |
| Verified date | March 2019 |
| Source | University of Texas at Austin |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | |
| Study type | Observational |
This study aims to assess differences between 4 types of single satisfaction measures. Secondly, if there is a difference in satisfaction between English speaking and Spanish speaking patients.
| Status | Completed |
| Enrollment | 256 |
| Est. completion date | March 2, 2019 |
| Est. primary completion date | March 1, 2019 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | 18 Years to 89 Years |
| Eligibility |
Inclusion criteria: - All new or return patients seeing a UE / LE surgeon - Age 18-89 - Able to provide informed consent - English speaking - UT Health Austin Musculoskeletal Institute, Austin Regional Clinic, Seton Institute for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Orthopaedic Specialists of Austin, Texas Orthopedics, and ATX Ortho. Exclusion criteria: - Not fluent in English |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | ATX Ortho | Austin | Texas |
| United States | Austin Regional Clinic | Austin | Texas |
| United States | HTB Musculoskeletal Institute | Austin | Texas |
| United States | Orthopedic Specialists of Austin | Austin | Texas |
| United States | Seton Institute for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery | Austin | Texas |
| United States | Texas Orthopedics | Austin | Texas |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| University of Texas at Austin |
United States,
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Patient satisfaction scale 1 | How helpful was this visit? Scale 1 has 5 anchors and numbers Scored from 0-10: 0 This visit was not helpful at all 1 2-3 There were many ways it could have been better 4 5 Neither useless nor helpful visit 6 7-8 Exceptionally helpful visit 9 10 One of the most helpful doctor visits I have ever had Higher scores indicate more satisfaction |
Immediately after the visit. Through study completion, approximately 6 months. | |
| Primary | Patient satisfaction scale 2 | How helpful was this visit? Scale 2 has 5 anchors and no numbers visible for the participant Scored from 0-10: 0 This visit was not helpful at all There were many ways it could have been better Neither useless nor helpful visit Exceptionally helpful visit 10 One of the most helpful doctor visits I have ever had Higher scores indicate more satisfaction |
Immediately after the visit. Through study completion, approximately 6 months. | |
| Primary | Patient satisfaction scale 3 | How helpful was this visit? Scale 3 is a visual analog scale with 3 anchors and numbers Scored from 0-100: 0 Least helpful visit 50 neutral 100 Most helpful visit Higher scores indicate more satisfaction |
Immediately after the visit. Through study completion, approximately 6 months. | |
| Primary | Patient satisfaction scale 4 | How helpful was this visit? Scale 4 is a visual analog scale with 3 anchors and no numbers visible for the participant Scored from 0-100: 0 This visit was not helpful at all 50 Neither useless nor helpful visit 100 One of the most helpful doctor visits I have ever had Higher scores indicate more satisfaction |
Immediately after the visit. Through study completion, approximately 6 months. |