Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04501068
Other study ID # MULTIAURAGAIN
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date January 1, 2018
Est. completion date June 1, 2020

Study information

Verified date July 2020
Source Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

The study was designed to evaluate the success rate, time of insertion, sealing efficacy and security of the Ambu® AuraGain in patients undergoing ambulatory surgery by one anesthetist


Description:

Supraglottic devices (SGD), in all their different forms, have become an authentic innovation in airway management especially in day surgery. The Ambu® AuraGainTM (Ambu A/S, Ballerup, Denmark) is a new single-use, anatomically curved supraglottic airway with an integrated gastric access port designed to provide functional separation of the respiratory and digestive tracts allowing the exit of gastric contents and the passage of a gastric tube to manage gastric contents.

Its characteristics in the design, composition by a smooth and atraumatic material, the presence of the gastric drainage access, with potential improved patient safety and its characteristic of being disposable, suggests a significant expansion of its use in the coming years.

The series in the literature reporting performance or safety of use of the Ambu® AuraGainTM come from studies on selected cases and in certain surgical procedures. However, there are limited studies that have evaluated the efficacy of the device in routine clinical practice in patients intervened in ambulatory surgery and performed by a single investigator.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 150
Est. completion date June 1, 2020
Est. primary completion date June 1, 2020
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Patients undergoing surgery procedures in ambulatory surgery usually performed with supraglottic devices.

- ASA physical status I-III patients

- Age 18-no limit

Exclusion Criteria:

- Patients with known difficult airway

- Patients with increased risk of aspiration

- Patient refusal to participate in the study

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Ambu® AuraGainTM
Evaluate the time of insertion, performance, security and insertion success rate of the Ambu® AuraGainTM in patients undergoing ambulatory surgery and general anaesthesia

Locations

Country Name City State
Spain Hospital Universitario Gregorio Maranon Madrid
Spain Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañon Madrid

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Spain, 

References & Publications (4)

Lopez AM, Agusti M, Gambus P, Pons M, Anglada T, Valero R. A randomized comparison of the Ambu AuraGain versus the LMA supreme in patients undergoing gynaecologic laparoscopic surgery. J Clin Monit Comput. 2017 Dec;31(6):1255-1262. doi: 10.1007/s10877-016 — View Citation

Preece G, Ng I, Lee K, Mezzavia P, Krieser R, Williams DL, Stewart O, Segal R. A randomised controlled trial comparing fibreoptic-guided tracheal intubation through two supraglottic devices: Ambu® AuraGain™ laryngeal mask and LMA® Fastrach™. Anaesth Inten — View Citation

Shariffuddin II, Teoh WH, Tang E, Hashim N, Loh PS. Ambu® AuraGain™ versus LMA Supreme™ Second Seal™: a randomised controlled trial comparing oropharyngeal leak pressures and gastric drain functionality in spontaneously breathing patients. Anaesth Intensi — View Citation

Wong DT, Ooi A, Singh KP, Dallaire A, Meliana V, Lau J, Chung F, Singh M, Wong J. Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure between the Ambu® AuraGain™ and the LMA® Supreme™ supraglottic airways: a randomized-controlled trial. Can J Anaesth. 2018 Jul;65(7 — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Evaluate the number of attempts to insert the Ambu® AuraGainTM supraglottic airway Insertion attempts (in numbers)
From picking up the Ambu® AuraGainTM supraglottic airway until the mask is placed into the patient mouth. (in numbers)
The number of insertion attempts will be collected after anesthesia induction
Primary Evaluate the time to insert the Ambu® AuraGainTM supraglottic airway The time from picking up the Ambu® AuraGainTM supraglottic airway until the cuff was inflated. (in seconds) The insertion time will be collected after anesthesia induction after administration of propofol
Secondary Blood pressure during insertion of the Ambu® AuraGainTM supraglottic airway Blood pressure in mmHg At baseline and every 3 minutes until 6 minutes after insertion of the Ambu® AuraGainTM supraglottic airway
Secondary Heart rate during insertion of the Ambu® AuraGainTM supraglottic airway heart rate Heart rate in beep per minute At baseline and every 3 minutes until 6 minutes after insertion of the Ambu® AuraGainTM supraglottic airway]
Secondary BIS data Bis data: number from 100 (awake) to 40-45 (anesthetic status) At baseline and every 3 minutes until 6 minutes after insertion of the Ambu® AuraGainTM supraglottic airway (To evaluate the evolution of BIS values during insertion of the Ambu® AuraGainTM supraglottic airway
Secondary Oropharyngeal leak pressure of the Ambu® AuraGainTM supraglottic airway. The Oropharyngeal leak pressure of the Ambu® AuraGainTM supraglottic airway will be determined with an intracuff pressure of 60 cm H2O by closing the expiratory valve of the breathing circle circuit at a fixed gas flow of 3 L/min and noting the pressure at which an oropharyngeal leak occurs. (in cm H2O) The Oropharyngeal leak pressure of the Ambu® AuraGainTM supraglottic airway will be collected 10 minutes after the Ambu® AuraGainTM supraglottic airway will be inserted]
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT06174896 - LMA Placement Techniques and Airway in Children and Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure N/A
Completed NCT04124770 - Neck Position and Ultrasound Landmark of Cricothyroid Membrane
Recruiting NCT04385576 - Taiwan "Aerosol Box" Versus UMMC "Intubation Box" N/A
Completed NCT00884754 - Comparison of GlideScope-Specific Rigid Stylet to Standard Malleable Stylet for GlideScope Intubation by Novice Operators N/A
Completed NCT05478122 - Soft Mist Spray Device for Airway Anaesthesia During Awake Videolaryngoscopy N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT06197880 - Airway Morphology After En-masse Retraction in Bimaxillary Protrusion Patients N/A
Completed NCT04533334 - Measurement of the Distances of the Lower Airway in Pediatric Population
Terminated NCT01031940 - CMAC® Versus Airtraq® and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Difficult Tracheal Intubation. N/A
Terminated NCT02955511 - Comparison of 3 Direct Laryngoscopes for Tracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery N/A
Recruiting NCT02210338 - A Comparison of the C-mac and Bonfils Intubation Fibrescope N/A
Completed NCT06356298 - Flexible Reinforced Laryngeal Mask Airway Versus Endotracheal Tube for Childhood Adenotonsillectomy Phase 2
Completed NCT03272776 - Multicenter Study of the Protector Laryngeal Mask
Recruiting NCT06245668 - SaCoVLM™ Video Laryngeal Mask Versus LMA Supreme N/A