Airway Management Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Randomised Controlled Trial of Intubation by Inexperienced Anaesthetists, Comparing the The Pentax Airway Scope AWS-S100 Rigid Video Laryngoscope(Pentax AWS) and the Macintosh Laryngoscope.
A randomised controlled trial of intubation by inexperienced anaesthetists, comparing the The Pentax Airway Scope AWS-S100 Rigid Video Laryngoscope(Pentax AWS) and the Macintosh Laryngoscope.
General anaesthesia often requires that the trachea be protected by intubation. This
involves placement of a cuffed endotracheal tube into the trachea, after the onset of
unconsciousness and muscle relaxation. Usually this requires the anaesthetist to obtain a
direct view of the patient's vocal cords via the mouth, using a laryngoscope such as the
Macintosh laryngoscope. The endotracheal tube is then guided through the vocal cords into
the trachea.
Difficult or failed intubation, is a potentially serious and occasionally life threatening
complication. This is the unexpected inability to place the endotracheal tube in the correct
place. The commonest cause is a failure to achieve an adequate view of the vocal cords at
laryngoscopy.
Failed or difficult intubation significantly delays establishment of a secure airway and
therefore can lead to major morbidity from hypoxia and/or aspiration of gastric contents.
Other morbidity can also ensue from delay to the procedure in emergency situations or airway
trauma due the various devices used or the force required to secure intubation. Whilst all
anaesthetists and their assistants are trained to deal with difficult or failed intubations,
disasters do occur. For example, in obstetrics, the previous Confidential Enquiry into
Maternal Deaths reported five of the six deaths directly due to anaesthesia were related to
intubation difficulties.
The Pentax Airway Scope AWS-S100 (Pentax AWS), Rigid Video Laryngoscope for Intubation is a
new self-contained video laryngoscope with an integral colour-viewing screen mounted on the
handle. A camera at the tip transmits an indirect image, which obviates the need to obtain a
direct view of the vocal cords. It requires no prior set-up of equipment and is intuitive to
use for anyone already competent in traditional direct laryngoscopy. Previously conducted
evaluations of the scope have been presented and show that intubation can be secured within
a clinically normal time span by various grades of anaesthetists in various clinical
situations. Authors are currently suggesting it has a role as a back-up device for difficult
intubations and for training. One has been obtained for the Foresterhill site for these
purposes.
RATIONALE The simplicity of use and intuitive function of the Pentax AWS suggests it may
have a wider role than as a back-up and could possibly be the first-line laryngoscope for
situations where difficulty with intubation is more likely or more hazardous.
The incidence of difficult or failed intubation for an individual anaesthetist is related to
their experience, decreasing as experience increases.
The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the Pentax AWS when used by relatively
inexperienced anaesthetists. Inexperienced anaesthetists are those most likely to encounter
difficulties and thus their practice carries the highest risk. Therefore, this is a setting
in which there would be a particular benefit to patient safety in having the most effective
tool for successful and timely completion of tracheal intubation.
METHODS The study will compare intubation using the Pentax AWS vs. the usual Macintosh
laryngoscope in a sample of patients where 1st and 2nd year specialist trainees in
anaesthesia (ST's) perform the intubation. There will be no other change in routine practice
for the purposes of the trial. Specifically, the trial will recruit only from the population
of patients that the ST's are routinely scheduled to intubate anyway. They will be working
under the direct supervision of a consultant or senior specialist registrar (SpR), at all
times.
Initially, data relating to routine intubations with the Macintosh laryngoscope will be
collected. We will conduct training in the method of use of the Pentax AWS with the ST's, to
a pre-determined level (see below) and collect and compare learning data, during routine
clinical work with this laryngoscope. Following on from this, we will determine the
effectiveness of the Pentax AWS in patients undergoing routine tracheal intubation.
4 ST's will perform the intubations within the trial. They fulfil the experience criteria
required of the study, they began anaesthetic training between August 2010 and August 2011,
have reached the required Royal College of Anaesthetists' level of competency in the
practice of intubation and are approved to anaesthetise with indirect supervision.
Prior to commencement of recruitment into this study, it will be necessary for these ST
anaesthetists to demonstrate a safe level of ability with the Pentax AWS. This is in order
not to compromise safety in those patients randomized to undergo intubation with the Pentax
AWS. They will be trained in the use of the Pentax AWS by the principle investigator (PI),
initially using an airway training manikin and then in normal clinical practice. After
gaining basic skill with the Pentax AWS, intubation with this scope will be timed.
Supervised training with the Pentax AWS will continue until the ST anaesthetist is able to
intubate in a clinically safe timeframe and then ST anaesthetists will be required to
perform this successfully without trainer input in ten consecutive procedures. Once assessed
as competent with the Pentax AWS by the PI they will be eligible to intubate patients
entering the trial.
;
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03908411 -
The Effect of Paratracheal Pressure on the Glottic View
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04564105 -
Simulation Training and Teamwork Concerning Intubation on the Icu
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02988336 -
TMHT - New Method of Difficult Intubation Prediction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03002857 -
Comparison of I-gel LMA, Classical LMA With a New Supraglottic Airway the Baska Mask® in Urological Surgery
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06337006 -
Laryngeal Mask Airway Failure in Pediatric Patients
|
||
Completed |
NCT03443219 -
RCT- LMA Supremeā¢ Versus the Spritztube® Tracheal Cannula in Anesthetized Adult Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05044416 -
VieScope in Patients With an Expected Difficult Airway
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05534451 -
Comparison Among Three Different Video Scope Guided Nasotracheal Intubation.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06073977 -
Risk Factors for Pediatric Difficult Supraglottic Airway Placement and Ventilation
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03687424 -
Can High-flow Nasal Oxygenation Improve Oxygen Saturation During Analgo-sedation in Obese Adults?
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03687385 -
The Effect of High-flow Nasal Oxygenation to the Saturation During Analgo-sedation in Different ASA Risk Class Patients
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT05055401 -
Airway Management Skills Amongst Anesthesia Providers
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02920879 -
Airway Effects of PEEP During Anesthesia Induction.
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02644837 -
AuraGain and iGel Crossover Comparison
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02263300 -
Spatial Orientation and Fiberoptic Intubation Skills in the Novice: A Randomized Controlled Trial
|
||
Completed |
NCT01718561 -
The Difficult Airway Management Trial: "The DIFFICAIR-Trial"
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01635660 -
Out-of-Hospital Randomized Comparison of Video-assisted Endotracheal Intubation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00956592 -
Clinical Evaluation of the Storz CMAC Laryngoscope
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00892671 -
Airway Management and Vascular Access Simulation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03848559 -
Airway Management With Simulated Microgravity Using a Submerged Model
|
N/A |