View clinical trials related to Advanced Cancer.
Filter by:The overall aim of this project is to evaluate the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and mechanisms of action of two psychoeducational interventions (a face-to-face nurse-led intervention called FOCUS+ and an eHealth intervention called iFOCUS) aimed at improving the emotional function and self-efficacy of patients with advanced cancer and their family caregiver. Both interventions are compared to care as usual. Both interventions focus on teaching dyads optimal ways to jointly manage the implications of advanced cancer and responding to their priority concerns and are designed to be tailored to the specific needs and wishes of the patient-caregiver dyads. Tailoring is based on information about the dyad obtained at enrollment (e.g. age, relationship, etc.) and the responses in the intervention sessions. The overarching aim is addressed by five core intervention components: 1. supporting family involvement and improving the dyads mutual communication, 2. supporting outlook (i.e. increasing the dyad's capacity to identify positive or meaningful aspects related to their situation), 3. increasing dyads' coping skills, i.e. their capacity to identify their coping strategies and take action 4. help dyads reduce their uncertainty 5. teaching symptom management and giving them confidence to handle specific tasks and problems Project objectives: 1. To compare 1) the face-to-face FOCUS+ intervention and 2) the iFOCUS web intervention to 3) care as usual in terms of their: - Effect on the emotional function and self-efficacy (primary outcomes), appraisal of illness, uncertainty, hopelessness, coping, dyad communication, quality of life and healthcare resource use of patients with advanced cancer and their family caregivers - Cost-effectiveness - Effects on vulnerable subgroups (particularly women and those of lower socioeconomic status) - Effectiveness in different healthcare systems 2. To evaluate the implementation process of the interventions in terms of the acceptability, feasibility, usefulness as perceived by patients, family caregivers and healthcare staff in each country, and their mechanisms of action. Data will be collected three times from patient-caregiver dyads: 1) baseline measure (t0) after which the dyad will immediately be randomized to one of the study arms, 2) first follow-up at 12 weeks after baseline (t1) and 3) second follow-up at 24 weeks after baseline (t2).
This study will compare the effectiveness of the Masterful supportive care intervention with that of the non-faith-based active control supportive care intervention, which uses the American Cancer Society's patient education materials, for Muslim patients who have advanced cancers. All 3 sessions may occur within one week or over multiple weeks (nonconsecutively), depending on the participants preference. The participant will have up to 12 weeks from recruitment to complete all sessions and follow up surveys.
In this research study, Cemiplimab is being evaluated as a treatment for advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in participants who have previously received an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant or kidney transplant. - This research study involves the following drug(s): - Cemiplimab - Everolimus or Sirolimus - Prednisone
This study will evaluate the safety, tolerability, drug levels, molecular effects, and clinical activity of MRTX849 in combination with TNO155 in patients with advanced solid tumors that have a KRAS G12C mutation.
This study will evaluate the effects of human-animal interaction on reducing anxiety, depression, worry, and pain and enhancing quality of life in children ages 8-17 years old with a life threatening cancer and their parent caregivers.
Open label, phase Ib study of intratumoral tilsotolimod in combination with intratumoral ipilimumab and intravenous nivolumab. The trial will be divided into two parts: PART A: the first part will assess the safety of two regimen and will recruit patients with all types of injectable solid malignancies PART B: the second part will include 3 expansion cohorts of 15 patients: - B1: anti-PD-1 refractory advanced NSCLC cohort - B2: anti-PD-1 refractory advanced melanoma cohort - B3: immunotherapy naïve microsatellite stable colorectal cancer (MSS CRC) cohort
This study aims to determine the clinical effectiveness of whole-genome and transcriptome analysis (WGTA) to guide advanced cancer care. The study setting is the British Columbia (BC) Personalized OncoGenomics (POG) program, a single group research study of WGTA guiding treatment planning for patients with advanced, incurable cancers (NCT02155621). To characterize clinical effectiveness, the survival impacts of POG's approach compared to usual care in matched controls will be estimated.
This study is an open-label, Phase 1, multicenter study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, PK, and PD profiles of AGEN2373 as a monotherapy and in combination with botensilimab (also known as AGEN1181), and to assess the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in subjects with advanced solid tumors.
Muscle is lost as part of the rectal cancer disease process. Surgery to treat rectal cancer and its subsequent immobility leads to increased muscle loss. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has been shown in previous studies in the critically ill to maintain muscle mass. The investigators aim to examine whether NMES use in the pre and postoperative setting preserves muscle mass, speeds up recovery and improves outcomes in advanced rectal cancer patients undergoing curative surgery. This is a phase II double blind randomised controlled clinical trial.
Using a cluster randomized design at the clinic level, this project will implement and test three real-world, scalable advance care planning interventions among primary care clinics across three University of California health systems. Seriously ill patients identified using data from the electronic health record will receive (1) an advance directive with targeted messaging, (2) intervention 1 plus prompting to engage with the Prepare For Your Care website, or (3) intervention 2 plus engagement from a clinic-based facilitator. A Research cohort of patients will provide complete surveys at baseline, 12 and 24 months. The main outcomes are advance directive completion among the population cohort and goal concordant care among the Research cohort at 12 months.