Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT04160026 |
Other study ID # |
18-073 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
Phase 4
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
November 11, 2019 |
Est. completion date |
July 31, 2020 |
Study information
Verified date |
April 2021 |
Source |
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
This multi-centre study will compare the acceptability, feasibility, cost and incremental
cost-effectiveness of intermittent preventive treatment (IPTp) with
dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) with or without azithromycin to the current strategy of
IPTp with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) to prevent malaria, sexually transmitted and
reproductive tract infections in HIV-uninfected pregnant women (IMPROVE).
Description:
Primary objectives:
1. To assess the acceptability, costs and incremental cost-effectiveness of IPTp-DP, with
or without AZ, compared to current policy of IPTp-SP in HIV-uninfected pregnant women.
2. To assess the feasibility of delivering IPTp-DP with or without a targeted information
transfer intervention among HIV-uninfected pregnant women attending ANC in the routine
health system i.e. non-trial settings.
Acceptability, costs and incremental cost-effectiveness will be assessed in the context of
the IMPROVE clinical trial in Kenya, Malawi and Tanzania (see NCT02909712).
We will also conduct an 'implementation feasibility' study in the routine setting in adjacent
sites to the IMPROVE trial site in Kenya (only), using a 3-arm cluster randomized design to
assess systems effectiveness, implementation strength, scalability, and identify potential
operational hurdles for scale up. Ministry of health nurses providing routine ANC services
will be trained to provide IPTp-DP or given refresher training for current policy (IPTp-SP).
The interventions will be implemented for a period of 10 months. Approximately 5-6 months
after the start of implementation, delivery effectiveness will be assessed through exit
interviews with pregnant women leaving ANC clinics. Women who receive the correct doses of
the interventions will be followed up at home 4-5 days after their clinic visit (i.e. no more
than 2 days after their 3-day regimen finished) and interviewed about adherence, including
pill counts. The quantitative study will be supplemented by a qualitative study to explain
the quantitative outcomes and to assess perceptions of scalability of the interventions
tested.
Feasibility study Interventions:
Monthly IPTp regimens: Arm 1. Standard single-day stat course of quality-assured SP; Arm 2.
Standard 3-day course of 3 to 5 tablets (40/320mg) of DP per day based on bodyweight
(Eurartesim®, AlfaSigma, Italy); Arm 3. Same as 2, with additional job aids and IEC
materials.
Outcome Measures
Feasibility study:
Primary Outcome - Adherence assessed through home visits: Proportion of pregnant women
attending ANC who receive the first dose of IPTp by DOT and the correct number of tablets for
subsequent doses (IPTp-DP) visited at home and who have verified they completed the
treatment. Where IPTp-SP is given by DOT this is assumed as 100% adherence and that the
correct dosage is given.
Secondary outcome - Delivery effectiveness assessed by exit interviews with pregnant women
leaving ANC: Proportion of pregnant women attending ANC for their first and second visit in
their second or third trimester who receive an appropriate dose with each drug/drug
combination. For the IPTp-DP arm, women will be asked whether the first dose was given by DOT
and the correct number of tablets for subsequent doses available on exit. For IPTp-SP the
full dose should be given by DOT.
Sample sizes:
Feasibility exit interviews (delivery rate): 1,485 pregnant women Feasibility home visits
(adherence rate): 744 pregnant women sampled from women enrolled in exit interviews
Acceptability among pregnant women: approx. 90 Acceptability among health providers:
approx.90